Governance systems and our leaders
We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.
![](https://assets-cdn.ekantipur.com/uploads/source/ads/900-100-0252024112350.gif)
![](https://assets-cdn.ekantipur.com/uploads/source/ads/ekantipur900x100-3082024084948.gif)
At this time, it is necessary to do a comparative analysis of the governance and prosperity of the democratic and monarchical countries of the world. Let's take a look at some monarchical countries. From Britain, Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, Norway to Australia, New Zealand, the influence of monarchy in Europe is significant, while in the Middle East countries like Qatar, UAE, Jordan, etc., only Arjun's vision is oriented towards prosperity.
![](https://assets-cdn.ekantipur.com/uploads/source/ads/comp-900x100-1672024010950.gif)
Growing up under the umbrella of the emperor, Japan is not only included in the 7 developed countries of the world, but is also becoming the only developed country in Asia. Based on the unwritten constitution, Britain is considered the mother of development in the world. The fact that Qatar's multifaceted development has reached its peak in the span of 2 decades is an exemplary subject for all. The mentioned monarchical countries appear to be leading the world in the human development index. Since
, we are not ignorant of the fact that many countries that have advanced in the democratic system have reached the peak of prosperity. Countries like America, Canada, France, Italy, Germany, China, Singapore, South Korea have created challenges in development, while India, the largest democratic country in the world, has succeeded in establishing a pillar of development on the world map. When referring to the political changes in Nepal since the Rana period, Panchayati rule in the year 2046, nothing but disappointment can be found.
Self-interested leaders have done nothing but make the country a crime scene. During the Panchayati regime, King Mahendra divided the country into development zones, established national parks for the purpose of nature conservation, and established significant relations with other countries from the construction of the East-West highway.
After the establishment of democracy, then Prime Minister Baburam Bhattarai widened roads and highways. Now the reference to Prime Minister Prachanda to address the obstacles and criminals of good governance is worthy of consideration. There is no doubt that our democracy will also be fruitful if good governance can be put into practice amid the reality that the country will become a disaster due to the selfishness of the ruler.
– Bhuvneshwar Sharma, Chandragiri-2, Kathmandu
![](https://assets-cdn.ekantipur.com/uploads/source/ads/900-x-100-1-0282024055738.gif)