Responsible for the restoration of democratic civilization

It simply means that till date we have not got dynamic leadership who can understand the importance of time and their duties. If it continues in the traditional manner, the New Year will surely pass like the past.

We, i.e. human civilization, have the sacrificial contribution and sustenance of our ancestors. Human beings do not need to write a great Mahabharata just to live a normal life. But how to live? Prestigious, quality or whatever? Its challenges are varied. Our economic, social and political structures have created various complications in human life. Since ancient times we have faced many ups and downs. However, today's progress has been made possible on the foundation of civilization developed in the world and the factors and pillars of progress are those civilizations.

We didn't get to where we are overnight. It has a long journey and background, a long history of great sacrifices and sacrifices. We have managed to run through the highways of ancient human civilization till today. But now how to go forward? Even after institutionalizing such a big political change in our context, we sometimes get caught up in unnecessary disputes about the way forward.

A character or organization with personal, family or institutional responsibility does not usually engage in unproductive debate. It doesn't make the people owls by shouting big dings over and over again. It does not give the slogan of prosperity that cannot be achieved immediately. Prosperity is a rare type of extreme progress achieved over a long period of time, which cannot be achieved in 2/4 years. Arjuna's vision of responsible leadership is focused on his goals, responsibilities and duties. But the irony is that Nepal's political parties often enjoy unproductive debates. Because they don't have a clear agenda for nation building. Basically, there is a complete lack of sense of responsibility.

Our political parties do not review and review their past. The leadership has no idea what the new generation's attitude is towards the current politics. Sometimes we see that public sentiment is on one side and our actions on the other. Why does this happen? This trend is harmful and very worrying for the political and economic future of the country and people.

How much progress of the country is possible with the unhealthy competition between different ideas, ideologies and thoughts? Is the prosperity achieved by the world and the many factors of progress are only political ideologies or promises? That is also efficient leadership. It seems that progress and development in the world is possible with the determination and honesty of the leadership rather than theories and arguments. Park Chung Hee, Mahathir, Lee Kuan Yew, Deng Xiao Peng are prime examples of this. It needs a deep and subtle study. Because sometimes in Nepali politics, such debates come without context or context. Communist leaders of Nepal make such debates when they are in power or in the opposition.

In the year 2074, when the UML-Maoist alliance got the majority, this debate reached its climax. At that time, Maoist Chairman Prachanda said very excitedly, 'Now we will rule for 50 years and show the world how communists rule and make Nepal the center of the international communist movement.' Prachanda was badly treated in both the previous incidents. Generally, political parties and leaders who are in charge of running the state should be of a serious nature, unusual frivolity does not speed up the society. It is very difficult to change the behavior of Congress and UML. Sometimes the political juggling between Congress President Sher Bahadur Deuba and Maoist President Prachanda, sometimes Prachanda and UML President KP Sharma Oli has not been able to give a positive turn to Nepali society. The role of the new characters added in Nepali politics is not showing signs of being helpful.

Today's debate is not about how committed and loyal political parties are to the principles they espouse. Political theory has only become the show teeth of the parties. All anyone cares about is how relevant the occasional ideological debate between the parties is. Now there is no justification for empty theoretical debates. What are our priorities today, what is the condition of the people and the country, where is the world, how well have we used the opportunity to run the state, where have other countries reached, where are we and what will the new generation do? How different are we from others and what have we done better than others and what are we going to do more? What was our role when we got the opportunity to run the state? What do you plan to do now? In this context, there is a deep concern among the Nepali people that the new year will not be as tense and turbulent as the old one.

If time had been spent constructively after the promulgation of the new constitution, our country would have taken the path of good governance or at least the foundation of good governance would have been laid. It would awaken a ray of hope in the society and the suffering of the Nepalese people would be alleviated. But that didn't happen. It is mainly managed by the current constitution.

The then CPN who got the majority according to the election system is responsible. Even after the promulgation of the constitution, corruption, corruption, and the growth of power based on power and access remained the distortions. Even our parties started to encourage this trend. It was a big thunderbolt on public expectations after the epochal political change.

Machiavelli, who is considered a modern thinker of the political world, seems to be the ideal of Nepal's political parties. Machiabelli says, "Every ruler who governs well should always be concerned about his reputation and should be ready to get results even if necessary by adopting dishonesty". Regardless of whether they are Marxist, Leninist or Maoist in theory, the communist parties of Nepal are seen as leaders in this art.

During the establishment of federal democratic republic by ending the democratic system with the king, trying to make Ram Raja Prasad Singh the president by betraying Girija Prasad Koirala is a major historical illustration. Since then, trying to forcefully change the leadership of the Nepalese army, trying to issue a communist-influenced constitution, dissolving the parliament twice, and trying to exercise dictatorship by force have been the main events. It was a great political dishonesty and another wrong practice to try to go against the democratic system of governance against the spirit of the comprehensive peace agreement and the existing constitution. It is also a continuation of the Machiabellian philosophy against the commitment to peaceful democratic transformation presented to the people. In true democratic politics there is no place for deception, deception and dishonesty. No matter how much criticism there is in governance in this matter, the Congress President seems relatively sure of his words.

Will you spend the New Year in the same way? Are we broken beyond repair? Chanakya, a world-renowned diplomat, politician and thinker, says, 'Any organization or person can make a mistake. But we shouldn't wallow in guilt over past mistakes. We should take it as a lesson and move towards the goal.' We can move forward by publicly apologizing for past irresponsibility and mistakes. We can serve the country and the people according to the spirit and spirit of the Constituent Assembly by placing ourselves in the trust held by the people. We can amend the constitution according to the need of time. We can work above party, group or personal interests.

We have to strengthen the democratic governance system. The future of the new generation is to be secured. It is to enhance the international prestige of the country while keeping its sovereignty intact. To increase the self-esteem and self-esteem of Nepal and Nepali people. It is to meet the progress of the world by developing the country at a rapid pace. This is the main concern today. Let us all make the New Year a starting point. Good luck to everyone!