Dahal government fell, Dahal government was formed

The first disarray was when his party started an armed war in 052, which won 8 seats under the name of United People's Front and adopted the policy of 'Using Parliamentary Elections'. During the war, trying to communicate with the then king Birendra while he was achieving 'unprecedented' success by attacking the headquarters through the police station was not just another disorder, it was Dahal's journey from 'left' to 'right'.

After that, he is constantly taking the 'left-right' strategy. Because of this, he remains at the center of Nepali politics. Dahal, who aligned with the Congress in the last local, union and state elections, started cooperation with the UML after the elections when things did not agree with the Prime Minister. After two months after that, after a dispute over the presidential candidate, he turned to the Congress.

He has traveled with the Congress for nine days in a year during the 'Left-Right' journey. His left turn has extended his prime ministership but the journey to the 084 election is not easy.

After agreeing with UML, Rashtriya Swatantra Party, Janata Samajwadi, Civil Immunity, Dahal gave his own explanation of the new alliance during Martyrs' Week held in the capital. He claimed that he would move forward on the right and left under the guidance of Marxism.

'Is the road to revolution straight? We talk about Marx, Lenin, Mao, Che Guevara. Was the road they walked straight like a highway?'

He asked himself, "Man must walk with two legs." If it goes left, left left, and if it goes right, right right? Does that happen? Is this Marxism? No.' He claimed that sometimes going right and left is the right way, saying 'a concrete analysis of a concrete situation'.

'To reach the destination, you have to walk right and left with both feet,' he said, 'Maoist cannot live in stability by enjoying continuity,' he claimed, 'It is a race that creates new situations by creating disorder in continuity. Today, there has been a disruption in continuity again. What happened today is a big thing.'

He presented himself as a player in Nepali politics with the formation of a new power equation. "When Biplav (Netra Vikram Chand) rises, there is a wave in you," he told a meeting of leaders and workers of all Maoist factions on Monday. Until I die, the country will be in turmoil.'

Since it started its journey with UML after becoming the largest party in the Constituent Assembly of 065, since then the Congress has made alliances with UML again and again. Because of this, he is criticized as an unstable and unpredictable leader. As soon as he formulated the new equation, he explained it. Reactionaries call my leadership incredibly unpredictable. I'm not like that. "I am predictable towards the nation of Nepal," he said, "any time the reactionaries try to use me, I can kick them out."

065 In July, the then Chief of Army Staff, Rukmangat Katwal, who became the Prime Minister as the leader of the largest party, left the government in nine months. From his sudden resignation as Prime Minister in April 2016 to his collaboration with UML on Monday, he

has turned right and left like many byroads. He contested the election in alliance with UML in the 074 election and joined the party with UML on 3rd June 075. Then Dahal divorced UML President Oli in 077 February.

Looking back before that, he supported the then UML president Jhalnath Khanal in 067 after failing to get a majority for the prime minister for 17 times.

In January 2016, he left the race for the Prime Minister in the Parliament and made the then UML President Khanal the Prime Minister. At that time, he had claimed to have formed the government on his own strength. The Maoists, sitting outside the then Congress president Sushil Koirala's government, made UML president Oli the prime minister in 072 October. After disagreement with Oli, Dahal toppled the Oli government in May 2073. Then he went to cooperate with the Congress. Dahal himself became Prime Minister for the second time in collaboration with the Congress in July 1973. After resigning on 10 June 2074, Deuba became the Prime Minister.

In the face of the general election in November 2074, he formed an electoral alliance with the UML, calling it "Wapamanthi Ekta". In June 2016, the party united and formed CPN. Less than three years later, the power struggle with Oli escalated. He divorced Oli after the Supreme Court separated UML-Maoist.

After Oli dissolved the parliament twice, the Maoists came to the streets with the Congress and returned to the government after the advice of the Supreme Court. Dahal supported Deuba as Prime Minister saying that he would protect the constitution. Coordinated with Congress in local, union and state elections in 079. After the election results, after the Congress did not give Dahal the Prime Minister, he joined hands with the UML and became the Prime Minister.

He broke off cooperation with UML within two months and rejoined hands with Congress after he did not agree with UML on who to make the president. After collaborating with the Congress for a year and nine days, he has again taken a 'Left' step. He has given three main reasons for taking the left step. First, to move forward with consensus on the Transitional Justice Bill. Second, to lay the foundation for left-wing unity. And, thirdly, to make the work of the government more efficient according to the national needs and the people's wishes, and to advance the country in the direction of good governance, development and social justice and prosperity.

Political science professor Krishna Pokharel believes that Prime Minister Dahal broke the alliance with the Congress both as a desire and as a compulsion. "No leader takes left and right policies just out of desire. "There are certain constraints," he said, "even if it is easy for Prachanda (Dahal) to be in the government with the Congress, he may be forced to change the alliance after the prime minister himself becomes harmless."

After breaking up with Deuba and starting cooperation with Oli, the journey ahead is not easy. How will KP Sharma Oli behave while the Prime Minister is working, the upcoming journey depends on that. "The prime minister can work independently or not," he said, "but this alliance is not easy. Because whether or not Oli realizes the weakness he has done in the past, that is important. At that time, Prachandaji can turn right again.

Maoist Secretary Ram Karki believes that the magic of coming to power among the old party leaders is changing alliances. 'There should be science of thought along with political art,' he said, 'It is important that the alliance formed under the leadership of UML Maoist resolves the issues of farmers, workers and the lower class.'

He said that Dahal is eating interest from the past. There is a word in English, cacistocracy. Power led by the disabled. Incompetent people rule. "There is kakistocracy in Nepal," he said.

He remarked that Dahal was playing the math of power anyway. My proposal was to merge the old left party and form the Samajwadi Front. He made a cartoon of the Samajwadi Morcha to settle the math of power,' said Bhattarai, 'his thinking was weak, the problem of honesty was seen.' told "President Prachanda's left turn is right, but if the two leaders start fighting again, it will be difficult for the alliance to last for a long time," he said.

'There will be no problem in Saayatra due to responsibility sharing'

Bishnu Paudel

UML Vice President

Your government could not work, until this government falls, there will be no hope in the country. But suddenly again formed another alliance under the leadership of Pushpa Kamal Dahal. How did this situation develop?

What caused yesterday's alliance to get into trouble or break up was something that the leaders of the alliance would know better than us. Even if the alliance is about to break, naturally we have played a role to help the country. We joined only after the alliance broke up.

The distribution of posts in the new alliance is not finalized. Apart from the President and Vice President of the National Assembly, there is no agreement between the 4 parties. How will the allocation of ministries be finalized?

Yesterday's alliance was broken, even though the country had to be evacuated, we were revealed. Mainly, since the problem of the country and the people should be kept in the center, the issue of which position or who will take or give which position is secondary. Saving the country from a problem and taking it forward, instilling hope in the people is the main task. Our focus will be on that. However, the topic of who will take what responsibility? Let's settle it together, it's not such a big issue.

However, since you also have claims on the Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister, as well as the claims of the RSVP, the issue of distribution of posts is becoming complicated, right?

This is just a guess. In the present Sahayata, the issue of position and responsibility does not create any problem.

The previous time (Pus 10) was to take turns under the leadership of the Prime Minister in a similar equation. The period itself was fixed. But today there is no mention of the 8-point agreement between the 4 parties. What kind of understanding has there been between the two parties regarding the leadership and leadership of the government?

This is not a topic to be written on a paper.

Mutual trust is a bigger thing than what to do, how to do, whether or not to do it. Trustworthy and reliable relationship is established between the parties and the leaders in terms of moving this term of the Parliament effectively.

In the first phase, only three non-departmental ministers have been appointed. Whose leadership does the UML participate in? Has it been discussed within the party or not?

This is a matter of easy decision. There has been no discussion yet. Within five minutes of discussion, UML decides on this matter.

It is assumed that you will lead and participate in the government. Is there such an environment?

Currently, there is no discussion about which ministry, which person. The main issue is to instill the trust of the common citizen. We are doing the homework. Nothing has been said about the position, the ministry. I did not think that I should go to the government.

Even if you don't think so, maybe the party leadership or others will propose it?

No such thing happened. I am interested in being active in party work rather than going to the government this time. I will say it to the leadership and will work on the party itself. I will request the leadership not to send it to the government. It has not been decided who will go, under whose leadership. Our chairman will take a suitable decision on this matter. A discussion takes place at the appropriate time, the party decides. But this time I will be involved in party work.

...

'As finance minister I should have been thanked'

Prakasharan Mahat

Outgoing finance minister, Congress spokesperson

How did the situation of collapsing alliance arise? The Congress never troubled the Prime Minister about anything other than

ing, which could not be done. It could not have been easier than Congress to run the coalition. That too may not have reached the Prime Minister.

You stayed in the same cabinet, you had no idea that the coalition would change?

The leader who is thinking of changing the alliance walks and knows? It will appear at once after the necessary preparation is completed. It was thought that he should not do that once he had returned after forming an alliance with the UML. We were also receiving frequent calls from UML. But our party chairman did not do anything after joining a coalition. Otherwise, we could have formed an alliance with UML. However, they (Maoist leaders) are continuing. They may know where the compulsion came from.

The Maoists have raised questions about the Koshi case, the finance minister, the election of the National Assembly and some of the ideological aspects of the General Committee in the breakup of the alliance. What weaknesses do you think you have?

Even Krishna Prasad Sitaulaji did not get all the votes in the National Assembly elections. It does not mean that the party did not vote for the Maoist candidate deliberately trying to defeat him. Some crossed votes and took a vote. If so, there is a complaint that there was no votes without the Maoists of the Maoists. An openom is unbearable. Therefore, it is not dishonesty to the Maoists. Sometimes such an exception is. They do not think so. & NBSP; What is the Maoists' issue of Finance on

? What is reality? & Nbsp;

& NBSP; I have stayed within the system. Being good use of resources, I was aware that it was not misused. I had to thank me. Enthusiasm was eviciting with the International Investment Conference. Assynance Investment, to attract the private sector, to solve the private sector, to solve the problem of monetary policy, not the case? Walk non-in-law cannot be misused, sharing. The media has been raising that it should not be distributed to financial assistance. You do not know. & Nbsp.

does not mean that the Ministry of Finance and the Finance Minister has unbeaten the prime minister. It is not possible to talk other than the rules and regulations that are not possible for this. Just as the government land of Lumbini had been taking 99 years in Liz. I said it would not be like this. He said that the Prime Minister did not match. Ways did not happen. Acodiatrist was also talking about. What is the backings of what is 99 years? Said that the resorts had nothing. So let us first send a writer to come on the basis of adequate ministry first. I have been sent that I am not the basis for looking at this topic by looking at this issue. We have to go to power and advised that if I did not make a decision, however, is uncommon for good governance and law? The

-BREAK-BREA-BRAK-BRIENCE IS COLICATION IS OUT ACCESS. Everything has been done by advice. Some things were not suitable. It may seem that the Prime Minister is happening. But, legal and has not come. Talks to the victims of the people's war. That was involved in the concerned ministry by lifting the file and take them to a cabinet. How much it is possible to support the wounded? They have also helped them first. It's a matter of TRC. It is said that it can be reasonable to understand treated in these things. It is said that cannot be done without can't be done. I stayed as much as I was, I did a good job. When I arrived, I have saved by the economy. Rights do not come out of magic. The Story-BRAK Maoists have broken the alliances that have broken the alliances? & NBSP;

is everything excuses. Maybe, the communist party is one, wherever you may be the effect. This is what matters of the prime minister will receive five years. The last time, our party was ready to change the chairman. I would have let the prime minister's embarrassing the prime minister. What else did I do? Seriously, I worked without selfish interest. It does not go to the finance minister to run some other business. What is said outside is not true. We said that in the Most Purument. He had no meaning. The Maoists needed to go to another alliance in the pile. We had to stay from Koshi-committee to give no hopeless order. However, despite not doing these things, the Maoists were ready to go to the alliance with the UML. So it is just for us to show what he raised. & Nbsp;

is the hope to return to alliance again? & nbsp;

, we do not work back to the alliance again, neither is the expectation. This path is now closed. It is a matter of later circumstances how the situation becomes the situation tomorrow. But let us find it again, that's not try to do so. & Nbsp; The

is now the role of the opposition and NBSP; has been? & nbsp;

is currently living in opposition. However, this alliance does not seem to be tired for many days. The parties are a different thing. & Nbsp;

...

went to the government after the urges of the Prime Minister 'to'

& NBSP;

DP Aryal

Ravashapend Randhapati, why did the

Randhapa participate in the government? Randhapa has run his political campaign, which is not possible. The people need good governance and delivery, which is not over. We did not stay in the symbolic. And, in the current political case, the Prime Minister forcibly breaking cooperation with us by breaking cooperation by the largest party. We are partners in this equation that we need to give and give the people to deliver to the people.

was a forecast government, but why now attract the leftist equality? The

riya Prime Minister was watching the activities of Rhetpa's laws, working. He is the conclusion that the conference could not be delivered from the convenience of the alliance. And he urged that if found with Ravpala, he could succeed. We too want to be working. Therefore, the government is more than working as a government, minister, a chair. We want to work with coordinating with all the merchandise. Even if not, we want to show rules by working regulations by the ministry, not in laws. In this, we are also involved in the government since it has been a clear idea.

is the other condition of Randhapa's other condition & nbsp; what are nbsp;

we have asked for work back to the minimum common understanding in the past. He had to work from all the ministries according to the same, and the Ministry had to be distributed on the basis of experts. Let all the party distribute the Ministry from the Ministry from Type of Work and Let us go to the agreement what we did in the agreement we have reached. The chairman has been given to the Ministry Distribution Assumed to settle down. In that part of our parts, it seems to be followed by our ministry. It is then confident that sitting on the party's line by working accordingly. The

is coming out that the Nepal Ministry with the Ministry with Inspiration. What is your claim in it?

we have discussed with the chairperson in the Ministry of Praisun for the chairman. We have told him that we should claim this to claim. Accordingly, the chairman met with another party, and he has given oath today. I could not say that if the chairman had not made public the chairperson. We suggested that the chairperson should have been going to go to the government only if the Ministry was required to get the minimum meeting. As a formal financial resolved, I did not want to say, but the discussion is being discussed. & Nbsp; How much-Break is River in Story?

that many people did not have to join this government, how many ministries we were still noticed. Even today, leaders are in a discussion. & Nbsp;

you have sworn as departmental ministers without any claim, have any claim?

I said that the chairperson is easier for work to work. Only after all the ministry is finished, it was said that only after all the ministry is over.