In research, not arguments, but facts

A state-sponsored and protected big criminal who has grown up under the influence, pressure and influence of a long cycle of state misrule cannot be tamed. Effective, efficient and methodical investigations are needed to unravel and dismantle the organized gangs of political entrepreneurs who have succeeded in making the rule of law an integral part of the political business. Legal investigation means the process and system specified by the law to be confirmed by the evidence, to establish good governance and the recognition of the rule of law in the result. It is important to keep in mind that until the

strategy is turned into a silent and step-by-step action plan, the desired results cannot be achieved. No matter how much debate and rumors are made on political issues, police investigation depends on the disclosure of evidence collected by the use of professional abilities of the investigator. Where the perpetrator's involvement is quietly proven in a factual manner in the outcome. The police investigation is the method to confirm the involvement or non-involvement of the criminal with the matter to be determined. The basic problem at present is that the relation of 'big fish' seems to be connected with crime, but the association of facts does not seem to be able to confirm or want to confirm that relation. In this way, if the investigation is to proceed and increase, either the big fish will be freed from the appearance time, or they will be released from the court on an ordinary date. Past incident reports seem to confirm this.

The opening of investigation files and the staging of mocking actions with a focus on attracting or misleading public sentiment and public opinion will be suicidal even for Home Minister Ravi Lamichhane. If even the power that represents the issue of good governance and the imperative need for change in the country continues to make noise, then the country's time will surely be wasted on alternatives. It is a matter of irony that there is no sign of change in the thinking, style and mechanism of those who will guide the country in a new way. Activities such as issuing directives on Facebook status, walking around saying that no one who commits a crime will be left behind anywhere can be accepted as positive thinking, but it cannot be accepted as a style consistent with official and political responsibility. Because this kind of thinking and style is not supported by mechanisms that lead to results according to evidence. This problem may have arisen psychologically even though the distinction between formal and veiled responsibilities cannot be distinguished. Various roles and arguments can be presented on the screen. However, it is important to keep in mind that only facts and not logic can give results in official responsibility and research.

Chanakya's policy says - 'One should never be afraid of those who only make noise and arguments, those who do nothing, they only make noise and arguments.' The so-called big fish baiting strategy just doesn't work. Therefore, it seems necessary to bring them under the scope of investigation and take action in a planned manner according to the thought of making them an integral part of the legal process. For this, development of the investigative capacity of Nepal Police, a reliable organ of the state, sufficient investment in information system, expansion of the jurisdiction of the Central Bureau of Investigation, removal of procedural and technical obstacles in the investigation field, expansion and effectiveness of the forensic science laboratory should be included in the agenda of the Home Minister.

Instead of paying attention to issues of official dignity and jurisdiction, the tendency to look for immediate results only serves to stifle the nature of research. Krishna Bahadur Mahara and Arun Choudhary's exit from Hazir Zamani are recent vivid examples of this. If there is no immediate evidence, someone will be kept in custody and released in court. Witness testimony is not a matter of convenience for the accused. This is the dilemma of the research where the evidence has not yielded results. Even in the principles of the criminal justice system, the benefit of doubt and doubt is given to the accused. Due to activities such as devaluing the method and system of proving criminal offense, not being aware of the responsibility of bearing the burden of proof, it seems that the tendency to hastily reach the conclusion of the investigation is becoming prevalent. What should be determined according to law should not be combined with the desire for political direction. The investigation of criminal offenses should be made a matter of legal judgment rather than a matter of political whims and fancies. The police investigation should not be kept outside the prescribed method as per the law. The prescribed method should mean the method of delivering parts, color and style. On the basis of the same facts and evidence, why some were prosecuted and some were acquitted? This raises the issue of why the state discriminated against equal application of the law. In fact, this is more of a political issue than a police investigation. This case has come to the surface as a result of not allowing the police investigation to be carried out at the discretion of the investigator.

The first essential condition of an impartial investigation is to keep the police investigation away from the shadows of political interests. In performing this role, Home Administration and Home Minister can take important decisions. The state machinery is caught in the clutches of the political machinations of the state. Raviji's thinking that he will not leave all the big fish in the court of law until he is freed from this cannot give results and results.

Conducting a police investigation in an efficient and factual manner requires many things to be taken care of. For this, if the Minister of Home Affairs only pays attention to the issue of developing and expanding the investigative capacity of the police and making fair use of that capacity, the detailed work will be done by the mechanism itself. A monotonous instructional style of own thinking and one's own style will make the research mechanism inactive, while the evidence goes from one side to the other. As a result, the possibility of a repetition of the fish-frog trend cannot be ruled out. A symbolic sign of existing activity seems to be found in the frog, which is not and will not be expected to be meaningful from a character representing a transformative spirit.