The question facing the Congress: Does the person who does not remove those who are being investigated talk about ethics and good governance?

Lamichhane raised the question on what basis the Congress, which initiated the investigation and did not remove the person under investigation from the chair, raised the question.

While leaving the meeting of the House of Representatives on Tuesday, Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister Lamichhane questioned what kind of parliamentary practice the Congress had conducted. 'The manner in which Parliament has been obstructed . In a supplementary, vertical complaint, the practice of blocking the parliament is trying to be taught if the Nepali Congress is a party bathed in milk or not ? The Nepali people have understood that,' said Lamichhane, 'If you are going to block the parliament on a vertical complaint, I urge you to stick to it . We will answer with work . Let the Congress block the Parliament for 4 years, let our current system work for 4 years . Does the Congress that does irregularity, influences the investigation, does not remove the person under investigation from the chair and talks about ethics and good governance?' 'I don't have to say anything, work isn't talking and ? I was in the opposition today, I had to speak, I had to say, now we are in the government, the work done every day has spoken for itself.'

Lamichhane said that a parliamentary committee has been requested to investigate him and will see how politics will move forward. A parliamentary inquiry committee has been requested, that is what they are asking for. Asking is in place, let's see how it goes. There is a difference between having a conflict and having it, one is never free from a conflict . We have proceeded to work . You are seeing signs of work,' he said .