The development of technology and the pursuit of fertility

It was not only difficult to do agricultural work in such a cold weather, but it also became a problem to harvest the agricultural produce needed for the whole year. To cope with the lack of food, people emphasized on the development of mechanized technology for wide area farming and exchange.

To make the work done by human labor easier, domestic animals, wind and water velocity were not possible only, but they succeeded in making steam-powered devices. It became a milestone in the human consciousness of controlling motion from the inherent energy of nature. Other parallel discoveries and inventions in the nature and human dimensions have widened the scope of scientific research and laid a new foundation for industrialization.

Large factories were built to grow products for human use and consumption. Means of transport and infrastructure were made for transporting raw materials. Exploitation of natural and mineral resources intensified. With the strength of this technology, they started looking south in search of sources to meet food and other needs. It became an infallible weapon to replace scarcity with abundance. Farmers moving south took the path of subsistence rather than collection with the abundance of nature. It prioritized the search for fertile land for increased production. Production was possible with the help of normal technology as there was no need to bring and collect from outside. Thus, both the North and the South followed the path of exploitation of nature as technology for farming and expansion of land became the main weapons of food production.

In both farming systems, the thought of restoring nature did not get priority. The North embarked on a journey of physical colonization in search of resources. The South became accustomed to a culture of resource giving and scarcity. With the help of this, the northern society not only succeeded in replacing the life of scarcity with abundance, but also succeeded in controlling the culture of scarcity in the consciousness of the southern society and making it subservient to it forever.

s were invented and discovered for resource control. Exploitation and exploitation of nature for resource extraction took place. As a result, two major wars took place. The end of the World War put a stop to the journey of physical colonization of nature exploitation. Fearing that this forced stop would destroy the heritage built on resources around the world, the colonial power continued its world tour of colonial travel, making knowledge, science and technology the tools of planned development. The control of society through the power of knowledge and technology was the most appropriate option to expand the physical colonial empire.

Just as mechanical technology was developed to cope with cold and food shortages, it was natural to look for ways to control it remotely. This technological development became the most infallible and strongest weapon of the imperialists who lost all the wars. For this, it was an easy way to make modern education its main weapon. Because industrial education, which became the infallible weapon of human consciousness, was spreading along with development. The expansion of customized education strengthened the comment that development is good.

The idea of ​​post-war reconstruction was the blueprint for finding these solutions. For this, the technology, education, planning and physical concepts of development of the industrial age were brought into use for the planned development of the society. Their gradual development over time served as an infallible weapon of remote control. It succeeded in establishing the belief that the foundation of industrialization based on external resources is the basic foundation of development. With the end of World War II, reparations for the destruction caused by its victors and a return to perpetual peace were proclaimed. Along with this, it was promised to make full use of scientific achievements and industrial progress for the advancement of the 'underdeveloped' region, relying on the psychology of self-imposed scarcity throughout the period of physical colonization.

What made this underdeveloped was the sponsored explanation of colonization and dominance. In this way, development was interpreted as their monopoly, while all the others called avikase succeeded in establishing a universal belief that only by learning from the same development, they can become modern, civilized, happy and prosperous people. However, the word 'underdeveloped' was used earlier in the context of social development. According to Gustavo Istiva, in 1942, Wilfred Benson called the backward region, and in 1944, Rosentine Rodan called the economically backward region, and in the same year, Arthur Lewis raised the sociological context of underdevelopment as the gap between the rich and the poor.

The society that was the origin of the war did not give much importance to their ideas. But 5 years later, the issue of underdevelopment raised by the American president did not limit this word to the meaning of progress and progress of the society. It succeeded in imposing a sense of inferiority upon a society that lived in abundance, carrying the burden of the undeveloped, who lived a rude and unrestrained life. To this end, the university, which became the center of Western knowledge, and the intellectuals it produced, were lined up by merchants determined to expand colonial empires. They embarked on a world tour in an altered avatar, further advancing a form of social anarchy called Yojana. Their journey was a new form of world travel undertaken by the Spanish Empire under the leadership of Christopher Columbus. This journey not only assessed the sources, but also laid the foundation for commentary on colonial development in society and social psychology.

In the days that followed, development became an Arya thought for many. It has not only become the most spoken and written jargon so far, it has become the basic standard for drawing the line between civilized-uncivilized, decent-unlimited people, communities and regions. It taught to draw lines of honor and dishonor between man, society and nature, distinguishing developed and undeveloped, high and low, have and have not, big and small, good and bad, rich and poor. Because of this, the gap of difference that can never be bridged in human civilization was deepened.

This deepened the color of differences and incited social groups to divide among themselves and to take sides based on vested interests. It not only gave legitimacy to the exploitation of nature as a whole under the guise of power, it also labeled communities, societies and regions with such non-destructive practices, civilizations and cultures as underdeveloped and backward. From this day onwards millions of tribals, tribes and other communities with different ways of life around the world became underdeveloped and undeveloped overnight. This ups and downs of development shook the diverse human civilization and culture that had evolved from thousands of years of coexistence and mutual interaction with nature within 7 decades.

It is now widely accepted that development means copying the Western way of life. It imposes the narrowness of the dependent mentality that only the Western structure of material development based on colonialism and domination is correct and society, civilization and culture based on the essence of abundance, diversity and equality are all wrong. The impact and impact of such development is even more complicated in today's so-called underdeveloped society. The common people, who did not even know what poverty and lack are until the previous day, are trying to divide their community into rich and poor, haves and have-nots, hoping for external help. Where is the

? They are becoming victims of inferiority complex by giving themselves the certificate of underdevelopment and making them the real claimants of the poor and disadvantaged. All these things have not only exploited nature and man under the guise of science, but the energy cycle and flow capacity of nature itself has started to be affected. The current soil and human health complications are the results of this. Climate change, destruction of biological diversity are only the crises that have come to the surface and are visible. The foundation of all the results lies in the world view created by the lack of resources in European society. It is a strategic roadmap for harnessing the resources needed to deal with such adversities of nature. Today's prosperity approach is only the social control of this development commentary.

In the name of development, it has imposed a slave mentality of enjoying imports while neglecting even basic products like food. Development (prosperity) imposed to maintain the hegemony of wealth based on external resources has bowed to the impossible stubbornness to prosper. It has forced them to leave farming and travel to the desert.

It is possible to set a path to an advanced future only by changing the world view of such scarcity and creating a framework of nature-human relations based on a broader view of abundance. Therefore, the leadership of the future society should rise above the narrow circle of human-centered prosperity, which is constantly migrating on the basis of industrial development. The pattern of growth must be in harmony with nature's behavior of reproducing for abundance. Its value recognition should not be determined by a narrow circle focused on the interests of human beings, but by the balanced standards of human culture, social behavior and the reproduction of sustainable nature.