३०.१२°C काठमाडौं
May the government's decision be mature
We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.
It is natural to ask why the government's decision is immature. Now there has been widespread criticism regarding the addition of posts in the Nepal Police. I don't know why the government did it.
But the question has arisen as to why he did it. There is news that there is no money to pay salaries to senior habaldar and senior Sai. If it is difficult to pay the salary, why should the post be added? Didn't the government know that it would increase the state's expenditure? Why couldn't the government pay attention to how much the expenditure will increase for the state by adding one post? When running the state, you have to think far-reaching, what is the point if you make a decision today and have to cancel the same decision tomorrow?
Habaldar's and senior habaldar's salary scales are kept the same, who agrees? As one position increases, everything should increase. Currently, there is a dispute regarding the 30-year service period in the police. Some say that 30 years of service is fine. Some say this is simply wrong. It is not good to come up and discuss such issues. Such issues should be arranged by the relevant minister within the organization. As in other agencies, political interference has increased in the police. Because of this, the organization is becoming weak. It would be better to keep the security agencies out of the political shadow.
– Purushottam Ghimire , Jorpati, Kathmandu
प्रकाशित : भाद्र २६, २०८१ ०७:०६
