२२.१२°C काठमाडौं
The question of republicanism
We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.
Thanks to Narayan Khadka for his balanced analysis in the August 6 issue of Kantipur under the title 'Republic if you can keep it'.
In its 235 years as a republic, the United States has faced countless challenges. According to writer Khadka, the Republic of America is a modern model. According to the US Constitution, people are born equal, so they are born with inalienable rights such as life (fundamental rights and liberties), liberty, and happiness. To obtain these rights, governments are formed through elections by the people and implement the rights with their consent. What was the purpose of our republic? At that time the end of autocracy was called. Why would BP have refused when someone from thirty-six years of plebiscite proposed to establish a republic? After twenty-seven years, the Congress was forced to join the republic for what was rejected at the time of the plebiscite? A very interesting question. Americans established a republic for the country. 17 thousand innocent Nepalis were killed here. Can the republic introduced in this way be compared to the American system?
– Bhattarai Bandhu , Chhatradev, Arghakhanchi
प्रकाशित : भाद्र ९, २०८१ ११:२६
