कान्तिपुर वेबसाईट
AdvertisementAdvertisement
२४.१२°C काठमाडौं
काठमाडौंमा वायुको गुणस्तर: ८०

Corruption case against 9 people including the then vice president of Tirhut rural municipality

भाद्र २३, २०८१
Corruption case against 9 people including the then vice president of Tirhut rural municipality
Disclaimer

We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:

This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.

The Abuse of Authority Investigation Commission has filed a corruption case in a special court against nine people, including the then deputy head and chief administrative officer of Saptari's Tirhut Rural Municipality, on charges of irregularities in the connection of solar lights.

The then vice president of the rural municipality and coordinator of the planning monitoring committee Tirthamaya Khatwe, members of the planning monitoring committee Durganand Yadav and Birendra Kumar Yadav, chief administrative officer Ram Narayan Sah, engineer Ugrananda Pathak, sub-engineer Jageshwar Mandal and consumer committee chairman Rabendra Kumar Yadav, secretary Dhirendra Yadav and treasurer Renukumari Yadav on Sunday 6 45 thousand 665 lakh rupees has been retained and a corruption case has been filed.

The Authority has taken a separate demand of Rs 645,665 in fines, imprisonment and embezzlement from three employees including the chief administrative officer and three officials of the consumer committee, including the deputy head of the municipality and the coordinator of the planning monitoring committee.

According to the spokesperson of the Authority, Joint Secretary Narahari Ghimire, in the year 2074/75, Ward No. From the investigation, it was revealed that due to the allocation of budget for the purchase and installation of solar lights from 1 to 5, the work was not done according to the contract, incorrect technical evaluation was done by saying that less work was done and more money was claimed for the work that was not done. In the same crime, the embezzled amount was wrongly maintained and fined, imprisoned and paid according to the wrong technical assessment of the work that was not/not done, and it was found that more work was done than what was/was actually done, and the measurement book and completed report was prepared and paid. .

प्रकाशित : भाद्र २३, २०८१ १७:०१
x
×