Reminiscing about the forgotten rebellion and discussing the present

The article provides an in-depth analysis of the environmental challenges associated with climate change. From Madhyapahar to Madhesh, the author has depicted the serious problems Nepal is facing through the problems of land conditions, air pollution, melting of glaciers and floods. In this context, the author has highlighted the lack of long-term strategy by forcefully pointing out the immediate response system of the government.

It has succeeded in drawing deep attention to Nepal's environmental instability and its socio-economic impact. Another important aspect is the Maoist insurgency and subsequent political changes. After a decade and a half, the political deviation of the Maoist leadership, their ideological crisis and the debate about the loss of justification for the revolution after coming to power exposes the failure of the current political leadership of Nepal.

The writer compares the historical contribution of the Maoist uprising and the political reality after the uprising and has neatly documented the deviation in the revolutionary approach. Especially, the example of the Maoist leadership not bringing the expected change at the policy level and also failing to develop a new ideology makes the reader think.

Although there are many strong points in the article, the lack of depth and lack of facts in some places has made the analysis superficial. For example, the various social movements that took place during the post-Maoist rebellion, such as civil movements, women's empowerment efforts, and tribal-tribal movements, have not been given enough space. Although these issues have played an important role in Nepal's political changes, the author has neglected to present an in-depth study and fair analysis of these aspects.

This causes the conscious reader to feel that the article is incomplete and incomplete. On the other hand, although the discussion about the Madhesh uprising is important, the author does not dare to go into a deep review of its roots and political failure. Although the analysis of the impact of the Madhesh movement and the problems in the implementation of federalism is correct, it does not cover the complaint that it did not give sufficient priority to the issues of civil rights, economic inequality and social justice.

If that were done, the context of the article would be more comprehensive, detailed and inclusive. Overall, the article has seriously reviewed the current social, political and environmental conditions of Nepal and inspired the reader for new thinking and discussion.
– Tekendra Adhikari, Biratnagar