कान्तिपुर वेबसाईट
AdvertisementAdvertisement
२६.१२°C काठमाडौं
काठमाडौंमा वायुको गुणस्तर: १४२

Is democracy okay?

भाद्र ११, २०८१
Is democracy okay?
Disclaimer

We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:

This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.

Highlights

  • Even if the political party leaders/activists have power, loot and high-fives, it is not at all safe for the inclusive democracy of the country. The remedy for this is the withdrawal of that leadership from the democratic system.

Our country is struggling with fundamental problems such as instability, underdevelopment, inefficiency and non-inclusion. Young people are worried about the future. What is the root cause and basis of such depression? In the society, conflict, differences of opinion, and efforts towards progress continue.

The habit of questioning has not been well developed in the society. Women's emancipation, caste discrimination system and freedom from untouchability, witchcraft, dowry system, end of Chhaupadi system should be continuously debated. Organized rebellion is also necessary against inequality and an inequitable state.

Since the current government led by KP Sharma Oli, composed of Congress and CPN-UML, oppressed communities including Dalits and women have become suspicious. It basically has two bases. First, there is a suspicion that the Congress-UML power alliance may put the constitutionally specific parliamentary recognition and practice in crisis. Second, Prime Minister Oli's frequent anti-public inclusivity expressions and his past and present behavior to prove it. It is well known that Oli is a bitter critic of inclusiveness and constitutionalism. Other governments, including the outgoing Pushpa Kamal Dahal leadership, have also experienced the unconstitutional character and behavior of other governments.

If the wishes of Congress-UML up to constitutional amendment are realized, the oppressed community may have to lose more rights. Although democracy is rule of law, there is a danger of going to rule by law. In such a situation, it is time to make a strategy, prepare for the struggle and make the people responsible for their constitutional and natural rights. However, activists from the Dalit community are attracted to Kotihome, they seem engrossed in absurd and meaningless activities like changing the scriptures, becoming a Hindu.

The meaning of going through caste system and class struggle is the continuous process of two types of struggle and conflict in political society. First, progressive and progressive consciousness, which continues to strive to make society more democratic, egalitarian and inclusive, humanistic, justice-loving and civilized. Second, regressive thinking, which seeks to push towards a religious classical racist, racist, chauvinistic, fatalistic, xenophobic, parasitic, pompous and uncivilized society.

These two lines of struggle have been going on continuously since the evolution of human life (first Buddha and then science has proved the evolution of animals including humans). No one's political, social opinion, argument, faith, spirit, God, God, scriptures or character should not become a weapon to spread hatred and incite violence against another human community. If it is used in such a way, it is the natural right of every human being to confidently oppose such system, argument, principle, character, faith, belief, consciousness, etc.

Inconclusive state power

Recently there has been a coup d'état in Bangladesh. Elected Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina was forced to flee the country for her life. Its two negative effects and the effect of propaganda did not stop from reaching us. The revolt in Bangladesh is anti-reservation. There is no word reservation in the constitution of Nepal, the word proportional is used. It should be noted that there are some differences between Bangladesh's reservation system and ours. Exiled Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina's father Sheikh Mujibur Rahman was the supreme leader of Bangladesh independence.

Bangladesh gained independence from East Pakistan in 1971 through an armed uprising. In 1972, reservation policy was implemented in Bangladesh. Many martyrs were martyred during the independence of Bangladesh and 30% reservation was provided for freedom fighters. 10 percent was allocated to women affected by the freedom struggle and 40 percent to backward districts.

In 1997, Sheikh Hasina arranged for the children of freedom fighters to get the reservation. Not only that, in 2010, through another amendment, she arranged that the grandchildren of the freedom fighters would also get it. After becoming controversial, Hasina abolished the reservation system in 2018 amid protests. However, the high court there re-established the reservation system.

Our constitution has provided for proportionality. Of course, our system is not without controversy. It is shameful to arrange seats even for the dominant ruling caste, community, which has no system anywhere in the world. However, the Dalit community is vilified for not enjoying a proportional system. Currently, some Dalit MLAs have entered Parliament.

Remember, the current Foreign Minister Arju Rana became an MP from the Khas-Arya women's quota. Not only that, she easily became a Congress central member from Kota. Ramsharan Mahat, the finance minister of the previous government, became an MP from the Khas-Arya quota. There are many such characters and examples, who got important party positions and MP positions in proportional quota.

Nepal's 10-year armed rebellion, historical people's movement of 2062/63, Madhesh rebellion, sacrifice, sacrifice and struggle of women, Dalits, tribal tribes, oppressed communities is the main achievement of the current constitution. This constitution has constitutionally guaranteed the principles of federal democratic republic, secularism (quasi), equality and inclusiveness. This constitution is not perfect, but the way is open to take more rights by using the constitutional rights guaranteed by it. It is also welcome that the acceptability of the constitution is increasing.

Prime Minister Oli's government is not based on inclusive principles. Dalits were zero in his cabinet. Soon after he became the Prime Minister, the government appointed new appointments such as ambassadors, heads of states, secretariats and other political appointments, judges, and other posts from the oppressed Dalit community. The Congress-UML coalition government became the government by keeping the stability of the government and constitutional amendment through the crooked path. There is a danger of curtailment of constitutional rights on oppressed communities. Amendment of the constitution is this

does not seem possible during the tenure of the Parliament, nor is it natural. It will be a democratic method and best to go to the voters with the reasons for the amendment in the next election and the issues to be amended and to decide whether to amend according to the mandate of the new referendum.

Inclusion is not only the Nepali people's revolution, people's movement, struggle and sacrifice but also an important basis of socio-cultural, geographical, religious, community, ethnic, political and economic diversity. The single racist of the country, repeatedly tested and incompetent, incompetent

Political party leaders/activists are given power, looted and high-handed, but the country's inclusive democracy is not safe at all. The remedy for this is the withdrawal of that leadership from the democratic system. Inclusion makes democracy healthier, more beautiful and more worthy.

प्रकाशित : भाद्र ११, २०८१ ०६:५०
×