Question on RSVP leaders - Do you still believe in Ravi's 'Iman'?

The report, which was passed by the House of Representatives on Monday and recommended for implementation by the government, recommended action against four people, including the then Managing Director Lamichhane, for the co-operative funds received by Gorkha Media Network.

As soon as the parts of the report written in plain language were made public, Speaker Lamichhane explained it in his own way and went to make a speech that the report gave a 'clean chit'. What is the

reality? Let's start with the language of the report and the part of the speech given by Lamichhane at the RSVP party office: part of the

report in the conclusion and suggestion section of paragraph 18 of the

report, the funds in the cooperative organization were irregularly received by the Gorkha Media Network and the directors in the process of making the money to be spent, Gitendrababu Rai. , Member Kumar Ramtel, Managing Director Ravi Lamichhane and Director Chabilal Joshi are responsible and it is clearly mentioned that they will recommend the Nepal government to take action according to the law .

_{View part of the report of the committee}

Part of Lamichhane's speech

Addressing the workers at the RSVP party office, Lamichhane claimed that 'the committee dismissed the allegations against us'.

"The charges against us have been dropped." Completely . For such a long time, we had endured that charge. The committee has made it clear that the persecution that took place, Lamichhane said, "We have no role in embezzling the funds of the cooperative and bringing the cooperative's money to the Gorkha media." Also claimed .

_{Lamichhane in RSVP office Monday's address The}

committee held Lamichhane responsible and recommended action to the Nepal government. But Ravi is saying that the charges against him have been dismissed. Let's put the two facts together and see Who is doing the job of confusing the facts ?

There is no legal system for investing or transferring funds from cooperatives to private companies. Funds have been collected in Gorkha media network according to the provisions that are not in the law and the collected money has been spent by Lamichhane. He has spent a large amount of money illegally by cutting a check as a managing director.

_{Section 50 of Cooperative Act 2074}

Even those who understand the general principles of law know that if any work is done using illegally obtained money, it is also considered illegal. However, Lamichhane is saying that he has no role in misappropriating the funds of the cooperative. The

committee confirmed his involvement on the basis of the statements made by Lamichhane for 10 hours, the amount received from the cooperative to the Gorkha media, and the receipts of the amount collected in the name of GB and Ravi.

The parliamentary committee has confirmed that the documents were used in the purchase and sale of shares of Gorkha Media. When buying and selling shares in companies such as Gorkha Media Network Pvt. Ltd., it was found that the payment instruments and instruments required by law were not complete and were bought and sold on the basis of documents, so it is necessary to ensure that the payment process is complete and to make binding arrangements regarding the payment of the corresponding tax and to study the legal arrangements related to sweat shares. And it is mentioned in the report of the committee that it will be recommended to the government of Nepal to draw the attention of the related agencies to make appropriate arrangements.

_{in response Although the}

report of the paper shows that the mood is showing in many places, Lamichhane received a 'clean chit' at the party office on Monday and gave a call saying 'if there is still evidence, bring it'. Now the question has been asked about the government here.

In the parliamentary system, the investigation conducted by the parliamentary committee and the instructions given by it must be followed by the executive . The House of Representatives has already sent the report to the government for implementation. Now how will the committee proceed with the matters discussed, all eyes are on the government.

Nepali Congress was the main party that blocked the Parliament and demanded about the misappropriation of cooperative savings. On the strength of Congress's struggle, it has been decided to form a special committee for cooperative investigation within the parliament. Now the task of implementing the report of the Parliamentary Inquiry Committee, which was created on its own strength, has also come to the hands of the Congress. Because, the Ministry of Home Affairs, which will proceed with the process of investigation and prosecution of this incident, is led by Congress's Ramesh Lekhtar, who is also the most demanding leader for the formation of this investigation committee in the House of Representatives.

In the parliamentary history of Nepal, there are many examples of large scams and irregularities being investigated by the committee and the government taking them to the prosecution process. The Sudan scandal is a representative example.

The Sudan scandal was a matter connected with the purchase of the APC of the police . But the fraud of this cooperative And embezzlement of savings is a bigger scam than that. Because, here thousands of citizens have embezzled their savings from daily suffering and people like Lamichhane, who came into politics spreading the illusion that they will change the lives of the citizens, have embezzled their savings.

Lamichhane's misappropriation of money is less than the overall savings embezzlement, but he is more involved than others . Because, he has played on the sentiments of the citizens .

Lamichhane, who formed the party saying that he would do a different kind of politics, has already been involved in misappropriation of cooperative savings through citizenship and passport within a year and a half. If there was no lack of faith in politics, Lamichhane should have apologized for his mistake and said that he is ready to take action according to the law. But he is not on that path . Even after the overall facts have come out, they are challenging it by saying that there is more evidence.

Let's remember two recent incidents of RSVP. The audio of Dhakakumar Shrestha having transacted money to become an MP has been released. He resigned from MP . Mukul Dhakal acted against the party discipline, he was expelled . Both these incidents were internal affairs of the party rather than connected with the people.

However, Speaker Lamichhane is not a party matter, he has been found guilty by the Parliamentary Inquiry Committee for misappropriation of citizens' savings and is on the list to be prosecuted . Will Dhakakumar and Mukul's example apply to him?

Lamichhane will still defend himself in a loud voice, but how do other leaders who are connected to Raswapa take this matter by saying that they do the politics of faith? How will the leaders of RSVP save Lamichhane in front of thousands of citizens who are left stranded after the 2/4 thousand rupees that they saved by cutting their bales for the future have been eaten by the people? How did the entire party and its leaders stand in defense of the abuse committed by a person in an organization? Is the answer to these questions in the Raswapa Searched for in the first national gathering ? Or, will the gathering focus on the defense of Ravi's 'Iman'? Now the time of examination has also started on other leaders of RSVP .