कान्तिपुर वेबसाईट
AdvertisementAdvertisement
२५.१२°C काठमाडौं
काठमाडौंमा वायुको गुणस्तर: १५१
सहकारी ठगी प्रकरण

Consensus in Juten Working Group on Jurisdiction of Parliamentary Inquiry Committee

Consensus in Juten Working Group on Jurisdiction of Parliamentary Inquiry Committee
Disclaimer

We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:

This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.

Highlights

  • The ruling party's insistence that names should not be included in the inquiry committee, the Congress's stance of not backing down from the demand

The meeting to finalize the mandate of the Parliamentary Inquiry Committee, which was supposed to be formed to investigate the misappropriation of funds of the cooperatives, ended without a conclusion. The meeting of the working group held at Singh Darbar on Tuesday also failed to finalize the mandate.

Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs Minister Padam Giri said that although various options were discussed in the meeting, no conclusion was reached. He said today's working group meeting was positive. 'Exactly we have not reached the end. We have discussed from different angles. Various options have been discussed. It has been agreed that we will create a mandate with consensus. We will come to a decision in the next meeting,' said Minister Giri. He said that it is not fair to plead guilty before the investigation and accordingly the government is not in favor of forming a parliamentary investigation committee. did

The main opposition party, the Congress, is accusing Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister Ravi Lamichhane of being involved in the embezzlement of the co-operative's funds, and is maintaining the position that the order should be made by naming names. The position of the main opposition is to list the names, the position of the ruling party is that the names of individuals should not be listed. We have requested that the House should run and not be stopped. We will proceed in such a way as to reach a conclusion as soon as possible and give the responsibility of the investigation committee. It is not fair to plead guilty before the investigation, we will not proceed that way," he said.

In a conversation with the media persons after the meeting, UML chief whip Mahesh Kumar Bertaula said that the meeting was cordial and it was discussed that the issue would be resolved by consensus. He said that his proposals were made between the ruling party and the main opposition party. informed. Both parties have agreed to make an agreement to get out. While giving the information, chief whip Bertaula said that there was a voice from the ruling party not to go that way because it would be uncomfortable to name names.

Similarly, Congress Joint General Minister Jeevan Pariyar said in the meeting that the Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister were involved in misappropriation of cooperative funds. He also said that there has been a discussion about further discussion and moving forward with consensus. He informed that they discussed the issues raised by the main opposition parties in the meeting to prepare a common consensus. He said that the Congress has maintained its stance of making a mandate by naming names as it has made clear demands. He said that the ruling party will bring a middle point proposal regarding the demand of the Congress and it will be discussed in the next meeting.

National Independent Party MP Shishir Khanal said that the discussion was held in a harmonious environment and the discussion was aimed at ending it through consensus. He said that he has progressed on the way to finish the mandate through consensus. He also said that the creation of TOR will not be stopped because of RASPA. He said that investigation committee should not be formed only on the basis of allegations. He said that it is necessary to form a committee to set a precedent to be established in the future.

प्रकाशित : जेष्ठ ८, २०८१ १२:०३
x
×