The list of candidates released by political parties for the upcoming elections has brought the debate about 'generational transition' back to the forefront in Nepali politics.

Election Commission data shows that, ‘Old and established parties still rely on mature candidates in the name of ‘experience’, while new political forces have taken risks by prioritizing youth and women.’

One of the main demands of the Gen-G movement in Bhadau was generational change and accountability in politics. But even in the elections held after the movement, there has been no significant transformation in traditional parties.

While distributing tickets, parties like the Congress, UML and Maoists have given priority to candidates who are older, financially capable and have old voter networks. On the contrary, the new voter group, especially the Gen-G generation, who are accustomed to technology, seems to value the agenda, transparency and even the age of the leadership.

Although voters will decide who has what influence in 165 constituencies, this ‘age gap’ in candidate selection does not indicate the direction in which future politics will move.

In particular, the presence of candidates under the age of 40 in the Nepali Congress, UML and NCP is negligible. In contrast, the National Independent Party (NISP) has challenged the established parties by giving a significant place to youth.

Age of candidates: How many young candidates in which party?

According to the Election Commission, the age limit of 40 years among direct candidates clearly shows the preference of the parties.

While there are 158 candidates above the age of 40 in the Congress, only 7 young people have got tickets. The situation is similar for UML and Maoists.