The communication style of the government has also reduced public trust. Instead of regularly informing the people of fact-based information, keeping silent on issues that should be discussed, debating on irrelevant issues, treating criticism as a personal attack instead of an ideological challenge, has made the government look like a supernatural power center rather than a responsible democratic mechanism.
The Congress and UML, the largest parties in the House of Representatives, formed a strong government with the ideal agreement and commitment, but they have spent a year without giving any such feeling in terms of performance. They themselves are confused, who came to power with a clear agreement to end the stagnation of the economy, to amend the constitution for stability, to maintain good governance in the country by controlling corruption, and to speed up the nation's development and construction campaign.
As a result, the achievement of other people's points mentioned in the seven-point agreement, except for the formation of the government of the Union and the provinces, is extremely low. In this way, Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli's government can be said to be strong based on the vote of confidence received in the House of Representatives at that time, but in reality, days are passing in the state of mind of a regular and unstable government. The government itself has not been able to acquire the confidence of being strong, it has not been able to give the feeling of a strong government, it has not been able to create a political-economic atmosphere.
In a parliamentary system, the union of the two major parties is generally not considered natural. The democrats and supporters of good governance do not expect such an alliance as much as possible because they are more likely to take advantage of the weak opposition and engage in state exploitation rather than accountability.
However, the Congress-UML had concluded that the country is falling into economic-political problems, and the frustration among the citizens is increasing and they have to come together to solve it. He explained that this journey to power is the 'Brahmastra' to solve all the problems of the country. If the country's problems are solved, then many supported it on the basis of practicality, keeping the theoretical aspect on the surface, saying that it would be fine. But if the performance of the government is to be considered since one year, 'Brahmastra' itself has become dull.
Congress-UML agreed on seven points on the night of 17 June 2081 before forming the government. Issues such as corruption control, good governance, speeding up the development campaign, government of national consensus, constitutional amendment, ending the relaxation of the economy, running economic activities, encouraging internal and external investment, and creating adequate and decent jobs were emphasized. But the ruling coalition does not seem to be serious about any of the mentioned issues.
results in poor performance. Whatever achievements have been achieved, it cannot be said that they have been achieved due to the initiative of a strong government. Although the external indicators of the economy are strong, the internal indicators have not been strong, the overall economy has not been relatively dynamic. The average loanable amount in the bank is more than 6 billion. This shows that the government is failing to create an investment environment.
The subject of constitutional amendment, which is given great importance, has been out of discussion these days. The government has also violated traditions that contribute to good governance and transparency, such as publishing the property details of prime ministers and ministers. The property details have not been made public for a year, and the reason for not being made public has also not been made public.
What is the state of good governance? In recent times, the details of Federal Affairs and General Administration Minister Rajkumar Gupta's 'deal' of 53 lakhs and 25 lakhs have been made public for two different purposes of stopping transfers and appointing them respectively. But the Prime Minister seems to be silent - he can neither defend the minister, nor dismiss him. As a result, his commitment to good governance is also in crisis.
There is no obstacle for the government to fulfill the agreement it has made. If there is an obstacle, there is dedication and seriousness towards it. Moral responsibility. It is natural that meeting people's expectations should not be a priority of the government, which has not been able to achieve the expected success. On the other hand, the government
is missed. Instead, many behaviors of the government have respected the constitution and the system. For example, within a few months of the formation of the government, a political mechanism that was not recognized by the constitution was created and started to overtake the established organs and structures of the state. Similarly, a high-level government reform commission was formed under the leadership of the Prime Minister last May.
The Prime Minister's work and decisions should be the basis of good governance, but it is ridiculous for the Prime Minister to lead the commission. Even the same commission is not clear about what it has done and what it is trying to do for three months.
In the meantime, the controversial ordinance was brought by pushing the parliament session. The government is doing things like interfering in the bills discussed and passed by the parliamentary committee. The authority bill, which is explained as political corruption, has been stopped because of Prime Minister Oli and the chairman of the ruling party Congress. On the other hand, Prime Minister Oli's role towards Tribhuvan University was seen as negative. After forcing the then vice chancellor to resign, he appointed a new vice chancellor just three months later.
It is not seen that he has taken the initiative to create an academic and academic environment in the university. Thus the weak performance of a strong government does not increase enthusiasm among the citizens. Also, Prime Minister Oli himself reiterates his claim that the government will not fall by deviating from the main issue. Whether the government falls or not is a secondary issue, the main issue is what did such a strong government do.
The coalition leaders probably don't have a factual answer to that. Instead, even the regular process like the appointment of the governor was prolonged for several weeks, raising suspicions that the coalition itself would collapse. This sends the message that the priority of the government is to appoint its own people rather than solving the problems of the financial sector. The
communication style of the government has also reduced public trust. Instead of regularly informing the people of fact-based information, keeping silent on issues that should be discussed, debating on irrelevant issues, treating criticism as a personal attack instead of an ideological challenge, has made the government look like a supernatural power center rather than a responsible democratic mechanism.
The significance of a strong government lies not in numerical strength in parliament, but in moral strength based on public trust. Therefore rational use of power, clear communication and honest intervention towards its commitment is expected from the government. If the government fails to self-examine even now, a priceless hope that something new will happen if the big parties come together will be canceled, it will be a matter of loss not only for the leaders of the two parties, but for the country as a whole .
