There has been a strong opposition in the Parliament over the agreement made by India and China to trade through Nepali land Lipulek. The parliamentarians of the ruling and opposition parties have commented that the neighboring countries have agreed to harm Nepal's independence and sovereignty.

In Thursday's meeting of the House of Representatives, the MPs stressed that India and China should not be allowed to trade through their land without the involvement of Nepal. They also drew the attention of the government to keep their words clear with both neighbors. 

The Nepali political party should be united and give the same message to both India and China – eyeing our land is not acceptable, Nepal counters this. - Gagan Thapa, Congress, General Minister Congress General Minister Gagan Thapa said that in the absence of Nepal, there is serious disagreement about the agreement made by India and China. Congress strongly disagrees with this behavior of our two neighbours. This is offensive, unacceptable. In this regard, the government should take forward the initiative by including everyone,' he said, 'Nepalese political parties should stand together and give the same message to both India and China - eyeing our land is not acceptable, Nepal will counter it.'

UML Chief Whip Mahesh Bertaula mentioned that Lipulek is an integral part of Nepal. "We want to oppose the agreement made by two neighboring countries for border trade through Nepali land without Nepal's participation, approval and information," he said. He said that the government should resolve this issue quickly through high-level diplomatic dialogue. 

The chief whip of the main opposition Maoists, Hitraj Pandey, informed that the party is paying serious attention to the agreement between China and India. He said that the government should take forward diplomatic and political initiatives to protect national independence. "We express our objection and protest against the agreement made without giving any information to our country," said Pandey, "We earnestly request the government of Nepal to take an effective diplomatic initiative by standing with Dahra in defense of nationhood, sovereignty and integrity."

UML's Thakur Gayre mentioned that Kalapani, Lipulek and Limpiyadhura are Nepali lands and said that the agreement between India and China to trade from there should be corrected. "It is wrong that the two countries do business using Nepali territory without discussion with Nepal. They should take back such a decision," he said. "Nepal's claim to Lipulekh, Limpiyadhura and Kalapani is not supported by historical documents, facts and evidence, and the Indian expression has come as a kind of declaration. This is a very scary expression.' 

India is giving misleading statements about Lipulekh by refusing to understand the EPG report. He also said that India should withdraw its troops from the Kalapani region. Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli demanded to raise this issue with the Heads of State from both sides.

The Prime Minister is visiting China, there is talk that the Indian Prime Minister will also participate there. After that, while the reference of the Prime Minister's visit to India is going on, the entire Parliament of Nepal should oppose the trade agreement between the two countries and India's very untrue statement, he said. 

MP Devendra Paudel, who is also the Maoist secretary, objected to the two neighbors agreeing to do business from Lipulek rather than a trilateral agreement. He said that the government should take diplomatic initiatives by holding all-sided talks within the country. countries are not big or small in terms of independence, self-respect, sovereignty, we want to oppose the agreement made for border trade by being Nepalese land. - Mahesh Bertaula, Chief Whip, UML