Vaidya keeping the dream of public uprising alive

The document of Vaidya, who became the general secretary of the Revolutionary Communist Party unanimously, has been passed as 'continuous revolution under the leadership and dictatorship of the proletariat in the middle of people's struggle and people's resistance struggle', in which the UML and Maoists have been described as 'right-wing, revisionist and parliamentary status quo parties'.

मंसिर २९, २०८१

गंगा बीसी

Vaidya keeping the dream of public uprising alive

The then Maoist vice-president Mohan Vaidya, who separated from the Maoist center in June 2069 on the grounds of public rebellion, has been unanimously elected as the general secretary of the Revolutionary Communist Party. The 79-year-old Vaidya was elected general secretary under a single leadership at the 10-day convention in Kathmandu. His party will have a permanent, politburo and central committee with no other officials.

 

 

The convention elected a central committee consisting of 117 full members and 80 alternate members last Monday. Born in Khaira, Pyuthan in 2003, Vaidya is considered to be a lecturer of Marxism philosophy in Nepal. He did not hold any position of convenience while Maoist was in power and strength. While he was in Maoist, he did not leave the policy of people's rebellion and kept different opinions. He still kept the dream of public uprising alive. His political student Pushpa Kamal Dahal has become Prime Minister three times through peaceful means. But Vaidya's party convention has again passed the policy of rebellion. 

"We must advance in the direction of continuous revolution under the leadership and dictatorship of the proletariat in the middle of the people's struggle and the people's resistance struggle." It is said in the document passed in the Congress of Vaidya, "In this way, on the way to the establishment of a new democratic state power" CP Gajurel, a senior leader of the Revolutionary Communist Party, said that the people's struggle will be carried out over the daily problems faced by the common people and it will gradually turn into a rebellion. "The direction of our party is to do people's struggle, people's movement and people's rebellion. We will fight peacefully in the beginning, then we will proceed according to the behavior of the government," he said. He said that the UML, Maoist center has adopted the policy of people's revolt saying that socialist revolution is not possible. 

'Classically, they have been presented as brokers and bureaucratic capitalists and feudal state power, and on the other hand, politically, they have been presented as supporters and defenders of the current parliamentary system and constitution', Vaidya's analysis says, 'All these are class syncretism, pluralism, By adopting the principles of collectivism and peaceful parliamentary competition, showing themselves as the real bearers of the backward class, state power and order, the unequal treaties and various treaties imposed against the Nepali people and Nepal by imperialism/expansionism. They have surrendered to domestic and foreign reactionary forces by accepting exploitation and oppression as they are, and are emerging as neo-oligarchs and neo-reactionary forces.' 

Vaidya has mentioned that the Congress was 'basically the first Nepali Congress among the parliamentary political parties'. "Classically, the Congress represents the broker and bureaucratic capitalist and feudal class," the document says, "Ideologically and politically, it embraces pluralism, democratic socialism and parliamentary democracy. It considers itself to be the only messiah of parliamentary democracy. Congress has been described as an 'old Raithane party which has been a supporter of parliamentary status quo'. 

The UML and the Maoist Center have been placed in the category of 'right-wing, revisionist and parliamentary status quo parties'. "There are some political parties in Nepal that are headed by right-wing revisionism on one side and parliamentary status quoism on the other," Vaidya's analysis says, "These types of parties basically include UML, Maoist Center, United Socialist Includes parties. As a form, all of them have called themselves the Communist Party.

Vaidya's analysis is that the National Independent Party is a parliamentarian party even though all parliamentarian political parties are called incompetent, failed and incapable. Vaidya said, "It has come into existence with the belief that the old state power, the current constitution and the parliamentary system should be changed, presenting itself as the real supporter of the system and not the system." He has also placed Netravikram Chand in the category of Maoists. 

After becoming the first party in the first election of the Constituent Assembly in 2064, the Maoists were pale in comparison to other parties. The powerful president of that party was Pushpa Kamal Dahal. 

Despite having a strong mandate on the basis of armed war, the Maoists were ambivalent whether to adopt a policy of insurgency or a peaceful one. Dahal and the then Vice President Baburam Bhattarai were in favor of taking a peaceful path while Senior Vice President Mohan Vaidya was in the line of rebellion. 

Vaidya, who was released from jail in India, was not satisfied that the party had come to a peaceful path. While he was in jail in India, President Dahal signed a detailed peace agreement with the then Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala on 5th November 2063. After the peace agreement with the government, Vaidya, who was released from India and returned to his country, was still seeing the possibility of rebellion. At the same time, in an extended meeting held by the Maoists in Balaju, Kathmandu in July 2064, Vaidya expressed a different opinion against Dahal, including the 'action direction of the public uprising'. 

Vaidya, who was in the majority in the central committee, forced Dahal to bow down. Dahal also agreed with Vaidya's policy and agreed with the policy of public revolt. That extended meeting passed the policy of 'Constituent Assembly in the mouth, people's constitution and rebellion in internal strategy'.

Vaidya's influence remained strong throughout his stay in the Maoists. At the Kharipati meeting in Bhaktapur in December 2065, the Vaidya faction's agenda of 'Establishing People's Republic through People's Rebellion' was passed. Unwillingly at that time, Dahal had agreed to the policy of moving from people's rebellion to people's democracy. The then Vice President Baburam Bhattarai disagreed with the policy of public uprising. 

In November 2067, in an extended meeting of the Maoists in Palungtar, Gorkha, vice-presidents Vaidya and Bhattarai had written separate dissenting opinions against President Dahal's proposal. In that meeting too, the policy of Dahal and Vaidya was passed and it was decided to prepare the basis of the rebellion. But at that time Vaidya became dissatisfied with Dahal's desire to embrace a peaceful path. After the process of adjustment of fighters from 28 camps in different parts of the country, Vaidya concluded that the Maoists have moved on the path of 'surrender'. Continuing the internal conflict within the party, he revolted in June 2069 and formed a new party called Revolutionary Maoist. Even after 11 years of separation from Maoist with the policy of people's rebellion, Vaidya has not left the policy of rebellion. 

Vaidya has never owned the path taken by the Maoist Center at present. Although one of the strategists of the armed war, he was always opposed to the peaceful course of action. Vaidya was arrested in Siliguri, India in March 2060 while the Maoists were at war. He was released in 2065 and returned to the country after the Maoist came to peaceful politics. But he is still in the line of seizing state power by force and making a new democratic revolution. 

In 2042, CPN Mashal was formed under the leadership of Vaidya and CPN Mashal was formed under the leadership of Mohan Vikram Singh. Moto Mashal was led by Vaidya, who passed the policy of armed people's war and even started preparations. Under the leadership of Vaidya, in 2043, Mashal attacked the Kathmandu police station and put up posters. The government arrested dozens of Mashal workers and severely tortured them. After Vaidya resigned as General Minister taking responsibility for it, the current Maoist Chairman Dahal was elected as General Minister. After Dahal was elected as the Chief Minister in 2045 by Mashal conference, he is the leader of the original party till now. 

Under the leadership of Vaidya, the first civil war training was held in Gorkha Siranchowk in 2045. In 2045 Vaidya was preparing to start the People's War, but it was postponed when the people's movement started. After Vaidya Pakha, the 'People's War' started in 2052 under the leadership of Dahal and lasted for 10 years. While Vaidya was in jail in India, the Maoist meeting in October 2016 passed the guidelines for a competitive democratic republic. 

Even though it has been ten years since the country became a federal democratic republic, Vaidya still hasn't given up on the policy of people's rebellion. Is that possible? Vaidya concluded the conference and said that 'it is possible'. The revolutionary forces must be united. "The revolution is not yet complete," he said, "people's power can be established through people's rebellion." That is possible. Gajurel, a senior leader of the Revolutionary Communist Party, argues that the uprising is possible because the UML, the Maoist center, has gone the way of the unified socialist right wing. "Maoist, Congress and UML have gone to the same lot. They are the status quo right wing," he added, "we are revolutionaries. This is the big difference between them and us. Dahal has led the 'people's war' for 10 years, but Gajurel argues that he has gone to the right-wing status quo path. 

Left-wing analyst and Maoist secretary Ram Karki said that 'Vaidya is an honest but fundamentalist leader who does not allow Marxism to be lowered even an inch'. 

emphasizes Marx's theory more than the originality of the country. Regardless of what the country's situation is, fanatics believe in Marxism, Leninism, Maoism. He is an honest leader in his ideals, beliefs and principles" Karki said, "He is afraid to change Marxism in the originality of Nepal even a little. He considers it impure when trying to modify Marxism.'

Karki says that Vaidya 'does not want to do a concrete analysis of the concrete situation and does not pay attention to the originality of Nepal, so it will be difficult for his people's uprising to succeed.' But because there is a dearth of revolutionary principles in the communist parties in Nepal, Vaidya can be a seed," he said.

गंगा बीसी

Link copied successfully