We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.
After one year, UML, Maoists and RSVP have come together and Congress has left the government. After the collapse of the alliance formed on December 10 last year, a new alliance was formed between the Congress and the Maoists with the presidential election on February 25.
According to the second tier leaders of UML-Maoist, a new political 'course' has started after an agreement was reached on the matter of changing the prime ministership and forming an electoral alliance or party unity in the 084 elections. According to this agreement, Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal dismissed all his ministers and appointed one minister each from UML, Maoist and RSVP on Monday. UML's Padam Giri, Maoist's Hit Bahadur Tamang and RSVP's Dolprasad Aryal have taken oath as non-departmental ministers.
After finalizing all matters including the leadership of the center and the provinces, there is a preparation to make the senior leaders of UML, RASWP and JASP participate in the government by giving them ministries along with the deputy prime minister. Since Jaspa President Upendra Yadav himself wants to participate in the government, he has not appointed anyone as a minister in the first phase. It has been agreed that he will take the Foreign Minister along with the Deputy Prime Minister.
Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal is also trying to get the United Samajwadi Party to participate in the government. On Monday evening, he reached his residence in Koteshwar and met United Samajwadi Party President Madhav Kumar Nepal. In this context, Kantipur had a brief conversation with the party's general secretary Ghanshyam Bhusal .
How have you taken the new alliance of UML and Maoists?
Yesterday, the situation in which the coalition was formed, did not continue in that manner. He wanted to give some positive message to the country's silence and ugliness. Despite other problems, the Congress could not make it easy to go in that direction. It was not easy to solve the issues of good governance and the problems of the people from the budget. We also gave a memorandum to the Prime Minister on these issues.
But the prime minister was angry when he did not get the support of the Congress. We also talked about this with the Congress. The claim of the President of the National Assembly should have been resolved within the alliance, but it was not possible. Finally the Prime Minister took this decision. This issue could have been discussed in the Samajwadi Front. It has come to the knowledge that Prime Minister Prachandaji told our president that he had some compulsions about this. The alliance was not able to fulfill its purpose.
Unified Socialist has taken the policy of 'wait and see', what is the probability of going to the government?
Let's look at the coalition means that the left unity has come up, it means to give the country an exit. What are the plans to achieve the objectives of the new alliance? What is the structure? We want to understand that. What are the boundaries of the coalition parties? Then we decide. We tried to form an alliance by protesting. Is it a sustainable alliance that is accountable to the nation or not? We want to understand. Wait and see does not mean that we are waiting to go to the government.
The Prime Minister himself went to the house of President Madhav Kumar Nepal and asked him to join the new alliance.
It was the request of the Prime Minister, I took a decision in a situation, I could not discuss with you institutionally, I had some obligations. It does not mean to come crawling. I came to request that we go together. He said that Oliji's message is the same. The Prime Minister has given some references, then we will consider.
So, did you not take the Prime Minister's action as a betrayal?
became the alliance yesterday. We did not cheat on those matters. Even now the alliance is broken, whose role is left? Let's discuss. The alliance was broken if we run it for five years. The Prime Minister broke down. But it is true that the coalition did not work as intended. The prime minister should take responsibility for the dissolution of the alliance.
