UML asked Rawal, Pandey and Timsina for an explanation saying that the party stood against the decision

kartik 4, 2081

UML asked Rawal, Pandey and Timsina for an explanation saying that the party stood against the decision

We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:

This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.

UML has decided to ask explanations from three people saying that they are standing against the decision of the party regarding the construction of the party building. The meeting of the secretariat on Sunday decided to ask the former vice president Bhim Rawal, standing committee member Vinda Pandey and central member Ushakiran Timsina for an explanation.

UML General Secretary Shankar Pokhrelal informed that he was asked for an explanation as he had expressed against the party's decision. They  He expressed that it was wrong to build a party building by taking land donation from businessman Meen Bahadur Gurung. Rawal has already mentioned in other subjects. Secretary General Pokharel who is speaking said.

'It has been decided to ask explanations from the leaders who go against the party decision in the debate on the construction of the central office . The former vice-president who disagreed with the party's policy and expressed his opinion  It has been decided to ask Bhim Rawal for an explanation as well' General Secretary Pokharel said after the meeting, 'They have been asked why he did such activities.'

Standing committee member Pandey said, 'This is a move to bow the self-respect of five lakh party members and insult 2.8 lakh voters'.

Although it is the duty of a business person to transparently contribute to social work under the company's social responsibility, she mentioned that it is wrong for a political party to take such help to build an office and for a businessman to give it. 'The giver knows why and how he gave. However, this decision, which was made without even knowing the discussion and decision at the decision-making level of the party, will prove to be suicidal in the long run. This wrong decision must be corrected if the history of the party made high by Manmohan and Madan, the self-respecting party line that survived in the present and the honor of UML is to be preserved for the future generations . Let's think in time .'

Central member Timsina said that a building irrigated with one's own sweat is more beautiful than a palace built by a businessman. She requested to take back the decision and said that the building built by her own sweat will be more beautiful and proud than the big palace built by a businessman in Madannagar. I want to appeal to the leadership to withdraw this decision. As long as we live as UML, stand with self-respect and keep the rest of the land.'

एमाले जग्गा दान प्रकरण

Link copied successfully