Conditions for the emergence of the Gen-G movement

The core essence of the Constitution is federalism and inclusiveness. If these two aspects are further weakened by amendments, it could be like opening a 'Pandora's Box'.

Magh 20, 2082

Yuwaraj Khatri

Conditions for the emergence of the Gen-G movement

We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:

This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.

The generation of grandparents fought for democracy. The fathers dedicated their lives for multi-party democracy and a republic. The generation of grandchildren and children also had to fight on 23 Bhadra.

Despite the multi-party system, democracy, republic and the necessary arrangements for national development in the country, the new generation protested with new demands. All these movements have some common demands – national development, end of corruption and social and economic development. This article is based on the youngest movement of the new generation of Nepal. This article focuses on the rise and fall of new forces brought by the Gen-G movement. 

The popular uprisings and revolutions in world history have created new debates. The movements of the new generation have led to the rise of new forces. The French Revolution of 1789 is a vivid example. The youth, lawyers and journalists were at the forefront of this revolution to end civil liberties, equality and feudalism. Youth like Maximilien Robespierre and Camille Deschamps led the French Revolution. This revolution led to the rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This movement brought about the debate between the right wing and the left wing in politics.

Similarly, the American War of Independence in 1776 established democratic values. The foundation of the South African anti-apartheid movement in the 20th century is the Soweto Uprising. The Soweto Uprising, which was carried out by school students, expanded into an anti-apartheid movement. These movements initiated new ideologies. By adopting that ideologies, a new power also emerged. In fact, the issue of how these movements emerged is very interesting. Immediately after the French Revolution, the event of 1795 gives the impression that state power shifted from the parties to the army. Napoleon Bonaparte had placed himself at the center of power. The American War of Independence in 1776 created the constitution. The constitution written in 1787 is still in force in America. Similarly, the management and emergence of the anti-apartheid movement was achieved through the establishment of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

Looking at the nature of the emergence of these three movements, it seems that they had an impact on the movements taking place in Nepal as well. The 2015 Constitution was an achievement of the democratic movement. Mahendra's rise during the Panchayat period was driven by a desire for absolute power. This reflects Napoleon Bonaparte's tendency to accumulate power. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission formed in Nepal after the 10-year People's War reflects the emergence of the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa. 

It remains to be seen how the wave of new forces brought by the Gen-G movement on 23 Bhadau and the legitimate issues of generational change, corruption eradication, and social justice will find a place. When the interim government was formed under the leadership of Sushila Karki on 27 Bhadau, the Gen-G movement should have been institutionalized through some agreement and moved forward. Although it was delayed, the 10-point agreement between the interim government and the Gen-G on 24 Mangsir 2082 will definitely lead to a successful emergence. This agreement has certainly answered most of the questions raised about the Gen-G movement. There were a mountain of questions, especially regarding the issues of monarchism and the Hindu nation. It seems that the political equations and activities taking place in Nepal after November 24 are being based on this agreement. In a way, there are new forces around the 10-point agreement. Point 3 of the agreement mentions the demand for an end to corruption and an investigation into the assets of politicians. This means that the slogans will now focus on this. Point 4 has started to surface the debate related to 'NOTA'. It is certain that voters will be deprived of this facility this time. Point 5 contains an agreement on amending the constitution. This was also one of the bases for the formation of the Congress-UML coalition government before Bhadra 23. The inclusion of points like inclusiveness, transparency, accountability, and digital rights in this agreement is a pleasant aspect in itself. The agenda of new and old political parties is sure to revolve around this agreement.

Balen's Janakpur speech has made it clear that the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), which has borne the moral guardianship of the Gen-G movement, now accepts federalism. The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), which boycotted the provincial assembly elections in the 2079 BS elections, needs to be clear on the issue of the constitution. Currently, the debate on constitutional amendment is going on in all parties. But what we need to understand is that the core essence of Nepal's constitution is federalism and inclusiveness. If these two aspects are amended and weakened further, it may be like opening a 'Pandora's box'. There are many issues that need to be improved in these provisions, but the new forces need to accept the fact that federalism and inclusiveness have established a national consensus. 

The new forces should save Nepal's Gen-G movement from the 'Thermidorian Reaction'. The 'Thermidorian Reaction' came about in the course of explaining the situation seen after the French Revolution. In the fluid state after the movement, citizens are looking for a constitutional permanent government, a liberal economy. In such a fluid state, the status quoists unite and try to take advantage and do everything possible to thwart the movement. This 'reaction' is called Thermidorian. It rebirths old parties and trends. UML is trying to take advantage of the fluid state created after the Gen-G movement. It seems as if he is using the slogan that the old forces should be united, pointing to the constitutionality of the government and other dimensions. 

Nepalis have become optimistic about Nepal after the 21 Falgun elections. Along with this, another fear has also arisen. That fear is that of 'populism'. Various mechanisms, institutions, bureaucracy, and police all play an important role in the running of the state. The running of the state has its own method. At present, the trust of citizens in constitutional institutions, courts, and state mechanisms has decreased. How can the new forces resolve such a dire situation or what measures will they adopt to restore the trust of citizens? This question must be raised. Raising agendas beyond their capacity can lead to individuals dominating the state mechanism. In the current situation, trust in the state mechanism is fruitful. It also facilitates the environment for the election process.

In short, the successful landing of this movement depends on the work of the government formed after the elections. In the long term, this movement must be protected from 'populism' and 'conservative' forces. The Gen-G rebellion was for exit and development. The success of this rebellion and the emergence of new forces is paramount to the country's development.

Yuwaraj

Link copied successfully