The debate has started whether to keep a 'cooling period' or not when giving constitutional and political appointments to former administrators. In my opinion, it is not only necessary but also necessary. There is already a tendency to please the political powers that there is an appointment after retirement.

There is a tendency among some employees to resign today and be appointed tomorrow. If such a tendency becomes widespread, it seems to be alarming. That's why a 'cooling period' is necessary. If only the legal system of 'cooling period' can be kept, any person's desire for the post can be controlled. 

Now it is necessary to improve the appointment of constitutional commissions. But how to make such an improvement? For this, the provision of 'cooling period' can be a starting point. The inclination of the person to be appointed is political  There is more towards leadership. Because if another wheel is changed while working, its status will not change . Yesterday's relationship will not change immediately . 

is now under discussion  If the 'cooling period' is kept for only two years, the relationship between the person seeking appointment and the political leadership may be broken or weakened. Because the relationship between individuals and political leadership is definitely not the same when they are in office and when they are out of office. And a person who was in power for a time in political leadership may have reached a different situation after two years. Or maybe the ring of power has reached outside. 

While in public service, the employees may have moved away from the reality of the society due to the same style and connection. In the 'cooling period', they also get an opportunity to understand the real situation of the society . And staying out of office can bring more maturity to a person's style and character. And it may not be necessary to do something that should not be done like yesterday. Because the person can be more independent . 

But some have argued that the 'cooling period' may also have some disadvantages. Some have also suspected that the 'cooling period' could be used as an opportunity for extortion by retired employees. But sitting in the highest position of the civil service is as easy as it is to annoy the leader of the political party and sitting outside the position is not that easy to annoy them. Because the 'cooling period' weakens the power of retired employees . But this time can also be an opportunity for people with qualifications and abilities to improve themselves. 

The 'cooling period' may bring some improvement in the constitutional commission and appointments to political posts. And the person to be appointed is also saved from the accusation . At the time of appointment by the society, it is less likely to ask the question that this person has been appointed by so-and-so.

According to the existing practice, some persons appointed to the constitutional bodies after their retirement, no matter how independent they are, the accusations against them  It takes . Although the decision-making process is similar, the eyes of the society are different for those who are appointed in this way. Therefore, because the favoritism of the appointed person is visible, they cannot belong to everyone . A 'cooling period' is also necessary to say that the person who gets the same appointment belongs to everyone and that they have reached there with merit .