”If there is no two-line struggle, the life of the party will end”

Conversation with Maoist Secretary Ram Karki

श्रावण १९, २०८२

कान्तिपुर संवाददाता

”If there is no two-line struggle, the life of the party will end”

What you should know

The internal conflict within the Maoists has been postponed for the next Central Committee. Recently, the inter-confrontation flared up after Deputy General Secretary Janardhan Sharma raised questions about the leadership of President Pushpa Kamal Dahal. The Communist Party has a principled belief that different opinions should be respected. But why is different opinion prohibited? Ekantipur had a conversation with Maoist Secretary Ram Karki about this.

 

Lately two-line conflict has been banned ?

Two-line struggle is unpleasant. You have to fight with your own comrades . You have to prove your friends wrong. But this is medicine . Even if it is bitter, you have to take advantage . If the two lines struggle, the party life will end . If there is no conflict, it is like a private company.

Oli is heard saying, "Don't imagine UML without Mabina". Man is mortal. Will Pati also die together? Party leadership where the leader remains special is not inevitable . If there is a talented leader, it does not mean that another one should come . If there is no same leadership, you can go to collective leadership .

Why does the Maoist seem indifferent to the criticism of the leadership ? Theoretical, ideological criticism of

leadership helps to be reformed . Supernatural praise does not help . Any change should be given sociological validity . We had to rewrite history. The role played by Congress, Malay, UML and Maoists should have become a matter of history. The curriculum of the educational institution should have been changed . Appreciation from Facebook establishes a leader ? President Prachanda has a long history in Nepal. We failed to establish that. Medicine should have been given. We did not give that . A leader is not established by singling praises personally. Every man has to deal with his system . The direction of the party, the program objective should also be the same . Discipline is maintained if the intention is good. If it is counted outside, don't cover it.

How will the contradictions of the Maoists be resolved? The

contradiction can be transformed . There is a bit of personal content in the current controversy. An open debate should be started by fixing the date of the convention. The current small conflict should be taken to a higher level. Who will punish whom? Criticism or superstitious praise ? We have to go through the convention through method and method.

Is the liberal leadership becoming dominant in the communists?

Looking at the upcoming policy socialism, we should not forget the party, looking at the party, we should not forget socialism . The old system is dying but the new one is not born. That situation becomes stressful . At this time, big and small idols appear . A party opened only by the family has idolatry . The contradictions of the society have been expressed in the party . We don't just talk about Maoists, we talk about the society . A comrade cannot be resolved by talking about personal action. It is not a question of individuals. Method and system are the key .

Maoist transfer of leadership is not possible ?

President Prachanda should be restored to health. The youth should be given leadership by sitting in a respectable place. If you look at it as a dialectician, the conflict will be resolved . Not that we are all spoiled . If everything was damaged, everything would be finished . Janardhan or any other person is not the problem . The problem is the society, the work direction and the program . It is not fair to abuse the president too much . Too much praise is also not good . Must be critically supported .

 

 

कान्तिपुर संवाददाता

Link copied successfully