In every genre, everything changes according to time. It is the same in acting. Something new has been added to the previous things. What is going on now will be refined in a few years. Time demands change.

Earlier, acting was only communication. Now there is a situation where you really need to take character . In today's society, the level of awareness of the audience, even if the characters are not considered credible. Until then, the audience will not believe it . That is why it has been refined. Every profession must be studied. Acting also requires study. That study can be done not only academically, but from every field. Sometimes learning is also through experience . 

is the process of learning acting. It is a craft. So it also has its own style . Studying plays an important role in understanding the elements of acting because a study gives one to know, understand and explore the ways of acting.

Before I studied, I thought acting was about recreating what the actors I watched had done. In general: crying, getting angry, laughing, expressing anger was thought to be acting. I was not able to connect acting with life. Studies seem to widen the scope of acting . Then I was able to connect acting with life . Because the study taught me to search, look, study and accept in myself from the things in life, I experienced its scope in a wide range . Match the study with the thinking of the

maker 

What you have studied, the method you follow does not match in some cases . In order to apply what you know, you have to agree with the producer and the story should also be in accordance with that . Struggling is difficult to get.  It should be clear what the

director wants from us. What did the script eat ? After being clear about these things, how to do it comes to mind . After reading the script, sitting with the director, interacting with the director, after having a conversation, the idea gradually becomes . Gradually, while studying the screenplay itself becomes a path. It is not meant to be done in the beginning.

In some cases, it feels like the maker has messed up in the selection of characters . Miscast says ni . There may be compelling circumstances in some cases. There will be hidden pages in it . It is best to choose a character that suits the character as much as possible. I also think it would be better if someone did the casting to see if the character would be shot or not. There is fill in many places where miss cast . It is better to choose an actor who fits the character as much as possible. You don't need to exert too much effort. Choosing an actor who suits the character is good for the audience, good for the maker and the artist.

acting may have its own understanding of

acting. Acting is the only thing that has changed in the film industry now. We don't want to work only as an actor in one. Many things are playing a role . There is enough time in any project  . However, the overall look is rushed. There is not enough time for film production. A character is missing for a long time . 

There is no situation in Nepal where an actor chooses a film and plays. That is not practical. Sometimes when you don't understand a lot, you have to do it without understanding . Our market is like that. has its own obligation . One film does not last for a year. Professionally, after doing this work, you have to do it . Due to this, the number of films over time is high, but the quality is low.

miss cast One of the main reasons for

miss cast is - 'face value' . Rather than how much faith you have in your screenplay, you have the opinion that if you take someone, it will work . Our content is good, if I were to say that I am confident as a maker, it would not have happened. But when one is not confident as a maker, one seeks the help of something. Even if he does not have confidence in himself, the maker will look for someone's help.  A

maker must be clear about what he wants. How clear are our makers? There is also confusion in some . It is also said that some have taken it for this reason. Sometimes it is also seen that the character is chosen in a good way . Sometimes the unseen ones happen . Whoever has chosen the character well, they seem to be clear in the making . Who hasn't . It seems they are not confident in the making . It is not only now that actors are chosen based on the character, Vasudev, it seems that it has been since the time of sacrifice. Even then, it is known that it was not taken by looking at any face. They were clear about what they wanted. 

Now how to cast correctly? Experts have their own opinion  Will be . In my understanding, the makers should do a deep study of what their character is, what is the environment of the character and the character's physicality, psychology, grow-up, and the basis of experience so that this character can fit.

actor's hard work

How seriously the film is taken depends on the actor . It may not be necessary to put in the same level of effort in every project. It depends on the project. An actor should work as hard as the character needs. There is a tradition of not taking acting seriously. It also has the idea of ​​color and fun, and some of the themes are very demanding. How many films are there that demand hard work. 

We are not able to be completely professional . Nepali film has barely appeared on that path. But we are more emotional when it comes to playing a character . At that time, we give a little more pain to our body and state of mind . We are working on it only with our will power. No security . At some points, it seems that the game was played along with his life. So far we have been doing it more emotionally. We are not following every safety standard. That is also difficult to do . That security should be .