Even after 30 days have passed since the two parties withdrew their support, Oli did not consider it necessary to take a vote of confidence.
What you should know
There is a constitutional provision that if the party that supported the government withdraws its support, the Prime Minister must take a vote of confidence within 30 days. Article 100 (2) of the Constitution provides for this.
However, even after 30 days have passed since the two parties participating in the government withdrew their support to the government, Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli did not consider it necessary to take a vote of confidence.
It has been 30 days since the withdrawal of support by the two parties on July 22. Not only this, our Prime Minister did not consider it necessary to give a written answer at the time set by the court.
What the constitution says to do is not to act. Failure to act is a violation of the constitution. It is an unconstitutional act. The prime minister can be dismissed from office if found to be true by withdrawing the letter of support and withdrawal from the relevant office when the government was formed.
The people are also judges. Intellectual Jamaat people understand the administration of justice well. A writ that has been heard in a two-judge bench is sent again to the full bench is to extend the time.
If such a long process is adopted in the general writ that requires all the necessary documents to be ordered immediately, how many people will be confused about the question of justice? People are not so disappointed.
Perhaps the order will come after Prime Minister Oli's term of power is over. It seems as if the hearing of the writ against the appointment of constitutional posts was done after 4 years. Let no one act to kill justice. -Kusum Neupane, Faculty of Law, Butwal Multiple Campus, Butwal
