When I read the news published in Kantipur on Baisakh 10, 2082 titled 'Government's mistrust of the government, good governance commission under the leadership of the prime minister', I was intrigued.
Because the powerful agencies under the Prime Minister should be made active and responsible to maintain good governance by controlling the daily operations of the government, corruption and corruption, a new mechanism has been formed under the name of the 15-member Good Governance Commission under the leadership of the Prime Minister, including the Minister of Finance, Home, Law and Federal Affairs and General Administration. While good governance is people-oriented administration, accountability, transparency, rule of law, corruption-free society, agile administration, financial discipline and good governance, the government is only doing the work of inflicting financial debt and psycho-social suffering on the people.
Ignoring the voices raised by the political circles and civil society to form a powerful commission to investigate the assets of people holding public office, does the Prime Minister agree to form an unnecessary and financial loss commission under his own presidency? On the other hand, even after 10 months of formation of the government, the property details of the members of the Council of Ministers have not been made public, and no one has taken any interest in this aspect. But the government employees must submit the property details within 60 days of the payment of the financial year. Realizing that the prime minister and ministers should be accountable and transparent to the public, the Oli government has broken the tradition of the prime minister and ministers submitting their asset statements within 15 days of the formation of the government since the time of Girija Prasad Koirala's government in 2048.
Dozens of powerful mechanisms related to corruption and good governance are placed under the office of the Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers. Isn't this mechanism to control corruption and maintain good governance? If yes, then why the formation of a commission as a parallel mechanism for this work? Does this not increase the public's distrust of the state system? Isn't it the responsibility and duty of the head of the government to carry forward the bill related to authority when there is a need for the government's support to investigate the suspicion that the leadership level is involved in a major corruption scandal? Can corruption control and good governance be maintained by forming unnecessary and parallel commissions, committees or task forces, which cannot make the existing mechanism powerful and operational, taking revenge against those who criticize the government? As a result, the state's budget is empty, people get jobs, but the situation is the same.
– Gangaraj Aryal , Panini-8, Pali, Arghakhanchi
