After the chairman of the Maoist Center Pushpa Kamal Dahal broke the alliance with the Congress and started the journey to power with the UML, in the first meeting of the House of Representatives held on Thursday, there was a tussle between the parliamentarians of the three major parties. At the beginning of the meeting, Prime Minister Dahal was scheduled to answer the questions raised by the MPs in the previous meeting.

The parliamentarians who questioned the prime minister from the opposition bench from February 6 to 18 were on the ruling party wave with him on Thursday. In the previous meeting of the House of Representatives, the MPs who stood in defense of the government reached the chair of the opposition.

During his address, the Prime Minister started to answer the questions raised by the parliamentarians earlier in the house at zero and special time. In those questions, the involvement of the then Physical Infrastructure and Transport Minister Prakash Jwala in the death of two youths due to the use of force by the police in the Balkumari incident in Lalitpur was the subject. Similarly, UML and RSWP have been demanding the resignation of the then Tourism Minister Sudan Kirati regarding the allegations of irregularity in the purchase of Teramox by the then Minister of Health and Population Mohan Basnet who went to the Authority and gave a statement to the authority and the land at Ramgram in Lumbini was given to the private sector. The RPP, which is currently in the opposition, had also warned of blocking the House. In response to those questions, Prime Minister Dahal said, "With the change in the political equation and the reorganization of the government, some of the MP's questions have been answered." For example, the subject of the then minister, who was said to be guilty in the Balkumari incident, has become irrelevant with the reorganization of the government.' 

After answering the questions raised in the House in the past about the involvement of Nepalese in the Russian army, dairy farmers, meter-banking victims and co-operative victims, Prime Minister Dahal entered the issue of changing parties in the coalition.

The Prime Minister said that he has no difficulty personally and partywise in the alliance with the Congress. "I was not in any problem or embarrassment as a person Pushpa Kamal Dahal 'Prachanda' in the previous power coalition, nor was the post of prime minister insecure," he said, "There was no personal distrust between the leadership of the Nepali Congress and me." Dahal said that the questions raised about the alliance in the Congress General Committee and the activities related to secularism were also the factors that led him to join the UML. 

After the Prime Minister's speech, Congress chief whip Ramesh Sukhar expressed his views on party lines. The author's presentation was about the issues behind the breakup of the coalition and its consequences and what the opposition bench will be like in the future. The writer answered each and every thing said by the Prime Minister. He said, 'Accepting the Prime Minister's statement that dignity and respect are not enough in politics, politics also needs other things, what I would like to say is that the Prime Minister has destroyed the values ​​and beliefs of the alliance and broken the consensus in the alliance unilaterally and in an unbelievable manner.' break Prime Minister Dahal raised the issue that the Congress did not support the Maoists in local elections, the House of Representatives and other elections. He also said that after the election, the Congress did not give the leadership of the Koshi state government contrary to the previous agreement.

After rejoining a situation, later in Koshi province, a group of Congress rebelled. That 'rebellion' should have been punished in the moral sense of the alliance, but it was rewarded. In the National Assembly election, that group defeated the Maoist candidate through a coup, he said.

However, the author said that the allegations made by Dahal are fiction, so-called cause, running away from his responsibilities by raising petty issues, destroying alliances and unbelievable work. "Due to my political commitment and quickness towards development, I have taken this step after thinking. It would be appropriate to look at it on the basis of political commitments and political issues rather than honesty and dishonesty,'' he said. It depends on the political situation and the political issue. The writer said about Dahal's statement, "Since it is a political matter, we had to say that it is political dishonesty."

The writer criticized Prime Minister Dahal for commenting on the internal affairs of the Congress. Why did the Congress general committee put up a stall before leaving the alliance? Congress is a democratic party. We believe in pluralism. We are not the only ones who believe, we have taught some other friends, let's face it, ideas arise," the writer said, "As far as the Prime Minister has talked about Hinduism, that is not the official agenda of the Congress. It has not been discussed and passed in the General Committee.'

The author countered that Dahal doubted the commitment of the Congress to the Constitution. We are committed to this constitution, we have said it many times because it is our leadership and participation in the making of the constitution. We are not sitting here with any weaker commitment to this constitution. Our most sincere commitment is to the Constitution,' the author asked, 'is it a weakness of the Congress if you have made a political event on the issue that the official opinion of the Congress has not been formed, is not being formed, and the official organization of the party has not decided?' He indicated that he did not get support from the ministers when he sought speed. He said that he did not get support from the ruling party. Dahal said that he took a second decision on whether to protect his position by running an ad hoc government or to take risks. To Dahal's statement that he did not get support from the ministers, the writer replied that he was the head and others did not work. The author challenged Dahal to lead the UML government saying that the prime minister's weakness was behind the ministers not working. Ministers are tools of the Prime Minister. A good craftsman escapes by blaming the tools, is there immunity?', asked the writer.