The UML has accused the government of failing to meet the expectations of the people in its first 100 days, saying it has failed on issues such as the constitution, human rights, and good governance.
We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.
UML has said that the government's work in the first 100 days of the government has been extremely weak, immature and controversial. UML has claimed that the government has failed in its first 100 days of the government.
'When analyzing the results of the 100 days based on facts, the government's work during the period appears to be extremely weak, immature and controversial,' said General Secretary Pokharel. UML has concluded that the government has not been successful in the areas of constitutional amendment, justice delivery, service delivery, and good governance.
'Even before the task force was formed to seek consensus on a serious issue like constitutional amendment, there was no minimum consultation with political parties. Trying to amend the constitution in a hasty, hasty and non-transparent manner is a serious political and constitutional error in itself,' said UML. 'The constitution is not a temporary political convenience for any government or a tool to balance power.' This is a document of the people's historical struggle, sacrifice and sovereign mandate.'
UML has alleged that the practice of direct rule has been started from the center, contrary to the 'Balen-Wacha' to strengthen the provinces during the election. 'Instead of making the necessary laws for the implementation of federalism, activities are being carried out with the wrong idea of centralizing power in the Prime Minister and running the government through executive orders,' UML has said.
Stating that the government has been silent regarding the demolition of Bhadra 24, UML has accused the government of being indifferent to the construction of public infrastructure and compensation for commercial and personal property (destruction).
UML has alleged that instead of investigating and taking action against those found guilty by the National Human Rights Commission in the Bhadra 24 incident, the government has entrusted important responsibilities of the state with protection. ‘Despite the commitment to implement dozens of reports of the Human Rights Commission and various other commissions within 30 days, they have been shelved.’ However, some reports of past commissions are being misused as ‘weapons of intimidation,’ says the UML.’
The UML says that an illegal and vindictive attack has been launched on political parties in the name of good governance. The UML says that former Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli and former Home Minister Ramesh Lekhak were hastily arrested without sufficient facts and evidence.’
‘Former Deputy Prime Minister and former Finance Minister Bishnu Prasad Poudel has become the latest ‘victim’ of vindictive behavior in the name of asset laundering.’ This clarifies the bias and contradictions in the government’s working style,’ says the UML.’
The UML alleges that the dozer terror has been created in the name of solving the problems of squatters and unorganized settlers. General Secretary Pokharel has accused the government of being on the path of 'thug rule' by ministers instead of solving the legal and procedural problems of construction entrepreneurs. 'In practice, the style of canceling contracts, stopping work, restarting the process and delaying decisions has given the opposite message,' UML said.
UML said that the Prime Minister has weakened the country's historical pride and national self-respect by making the statement that 'Nepal has also encroached on India's land.'
'The path to resolving the border dispute is not a surrender-oriented statement, but evidence-based diplomacy, all-party consensus in parliament and clear protection of national interests.' Such comments may give the impression that the government's foreign policy is not institutional but person-centered, which is contrary to the government's balanced foreign policy,' UML said in a 100-day review of the government.
‘Overall, the 100-day tenure of the Balen government appears to be a complete failure from the perspective of good governance and governance reforms,’ claims the UML. ‘Instead of working in line with its 100-point pledge and the expectations of the public, the government has shown interest only in cheap discussions and controversial decisions. As the morning indicates, the work of the government in the 100 days has proven that this government has completely failed to resolve the country’s economic crisis and maintain the rule of law.’
