Gangster capitalism of two-thirds was boiling until it reached the alliance of KP Sharma Oli and Sher Bahadur Deuba. As many people felt, the boiling milk in the sattarupi pot would either pour itself or someone would spill it - it was the same situation in the world.

The political, economic, social, diplomatic and cultural failure of the state authorities had matured the situation of rebellion. However, an insurgent organized force with an organized, ideologically and ideologically sound alternative, whatever its political credentials, did not stand to challenge such a force.

Former King Gyanendra's ambition to regain the throne was ended after a brief imprisonment with the recklessness of his charioteers. The main opposition in the parliament was not becoming an alternative power like a feeble old tiger with a beard. The RSP of the Youth Turks looked like a raven in a thick ground fog without a leader. 

In this chaotic political environment, former Prime Minister Oli was going to declare himself Chhatrapati by holding a party legislative convention. Undoubtedly, Congress President Deuba was waiting for the Prime Minister's turn after Oli. A day after he declared himself immortal within the

party, i.e. on 23 August, the Color Revolution started and the revolution was completed in the next 24 hours. On the afternoon of August 24, Deuba and Oli's condition was like that of the royal astrologer in the Greek story, who used to predict the fortunes and famines that would come in the lives of great noblemen with reliable mercury.

The background of the

movement The Gen-G i.e. the new generation announced on 20th of August that they would protest against the coalition government from 23rd of August with the two-point demand of removing the ban on social media and maintaining good governance by eradicating corruption. Before that, Gen-G generation was not defined in the context of Nepal, and no one had any idea what kind of organized and unorganized movement it would do.

According to the international definition of Gen-G, it was understood as an unorganized, inexperienced, 28-year-old unorganized jamat who wanted freedom, was fearless, had no guile, had no greed. Who are the organizers behind the propaganda that Gen-J will protest for the people or the government who understand this definition of Gen-Ji? If the movement turns violent, if it becomes bloody, if there is arson or looting, who will be responsible for it? Who will take control? This investigative policy falls under the responsibility of the state.

More unorganized movements require caution. After the beginning of the twenty-first century, such a possibility could not be ruled out in the perspective of many examples of unorganized movements being practiced in the 50th country and the practice of changing power and naming them as colorful movements.

Nepali land was fertile for such a movement. The lack of a carrier with credibility only stopped it. The creation of anti-people laws opened the way for political corruption, the institutional corruption of every sector of the state, not only the laws in a planned manner, but also the abuse of the state by reducing hundreds of scandals in violation of the constitution, and by abusing nepotism, nepotism and familyism, the educational and health institutions were almost destroyed, the political workers of the main parties were completely exploited by the state, they misused trillions of loans in the name of the state, and the lack of industrialization in the country. The background of the movement had been formed long ago due to the expansion of hundreds of criminal attitudes, such as the lack of employment, and the lack of planned development.

The anti-incumbency atmosphere started one month after Oli became the Prime Minister, i.e. during the Gaura festival of August 2081, in Tundikhel of the capital, in the presence of Oli and Deuba, by raising slogans against him. After that, there were loud slogans against Prime Minister Oli all over the country and abroad. However, in the power frenzy of the two-thirds majority, Jin-ji's movement was considered an ant with wings. But the political climate was different.

The tactic of suppressing the royalist movement was tried by his home administration on August 23 as well. When the protestors arrived at the original den, the normal procedures (barricades, miking, light baton charges, water cannons, rubber bullets and then only firing) were fired indiscriminately. Immediately 19 Kalila young students were killed and the news that more than 400 were injured due to gunshots became public. Naturally, on August 24, all sorts of elements joined the Zen-G performance to add fuel to the fire. 

The security agencies including the army sat with their hands and the unimaginable destruction of the national wealth came to an end. Not only physically, but for the first time, the executive, judiciary and legislature were institutionalized by the Nepalese state. The Nepalese kingdom was weakened to such an extent that it had never been destroyed before.

History of Color Revolution

revolution means an armed or decisive movement for a different political system. Which mainly changes the production method and the relationship of production completely. There is also an understanding that revolution is often achieved through violent agitation or war. Such revolutions were completed in French, American, Russian, Chinese, Cuba, Vietnam like

. Such revolutions used to be progressive, in favor of epoch-making changes, in favor of equality and justice. It was believed that such basic revolutions (radical revolutions) would not be completed without the leadership of the revolutionary party motivated by the institutional structure, i.e. the revolutionary ideology. 

Senior journalist and economist Will Hutton writes, 'The neo-conservative political leadership of the 20th century led to the invention of the color revolution. There were actually two reasons for this. First, to prevent a possible fundamental revolution in any country and second, to protect American interests. Some research institutes and universities were prepared to gather intellectual power and expenses for this search and research, to account for the impact of changes in thinking and technology on society, to search for characters, technology and new techniques.

He spent decades preparing the content. Among them is the name of the American academic organization associated with the exploration of the color revolution - Jane Sharpe, who prepared the theoretical, carrier work on how to do non-violent resistance. That organization is considered to be the father of the Color Revolution.' (Salva Hutton (2009) Radical Politics After the Crash, in What is Radical Politics Today, edited by Jonathan Pugh, Pelgrave Macmillan). 

However, there seems to be two understandings among intellectuals about the Color Revolution. First, democracy imported from Western countries, including America, to Eastern Soviet Republics and opposition countries. Second, its proponents say non-violent struggle for the restoration or establishment of democracy against the undemocratic attitude of the government. However, both these versions seem to have strong geopolitical connections.

American sociologist Jack A. Goldstone writes, "The Color Revolution organizers looked to the proletariat to establish a liberal ideal." Its co-ordination and expenses are borne by the imperialist powers for their own benefit. Sponsors of the Color Revolution appeal to the common people in defense of liberal ideology, but the benefits are in turn reaped by the bourgeoisie and the crony bureaucratic bourgeoisie. (Goldstone (2013) Revolution: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press). 

In the past three decades, more than 50 changes of power in the world have been sponsored by colorful revolutions. 90 percent of those attempts have been successful. However, those revolutions have had various consequences in their countries. Some led to economic disruption, some to social discord, some to civil war.

In fact, in most countries of the third world, especially in economy, finance, politics, party values ​​and recognition and social ideological discussion method, the Western ideology still dominates today. However, they do not hesitate to lash out against their own supporters if they see even the slightest blow to their interests.

Scholars say that this policy of color revolution is economically less expensive and less risky than the military intervention of the old order of imperialism. Like the military intervention in Afghanistan and Iraq that cost the US billions of dollars. However, in 2004, the United States spent only 65 million dollars for the Orange Revolution in Ukraine. He even succeeded in overthrowing the president who won the election and making him his pocket president.

In 2011, in preparation for the Arab Spring, campaign training was conducted in the Arab region to teach Internet writers how to run a Twitter campaign. which succeeded in inducing people to revolt at low cost (Krzysztof Kozolowski (2016) The Color Revolutions in the Post-Soviet Space: Illusion and Reality of the Post-Soviet Civil Disobedience, Warsaw School of Economics).

After 2010 Arab Spring (2011), Euro Maidan Ukraine 2014, Armenia, Bolivia (2019), Hong Kong (2019 failed), Belarus (2021 failed), Cuba (2021 failed), Georgia (2024 failed). These successful and unsuccessful color revolutions were carried out with the main objective of power change, causing political instability. In all these movements, the role of young students was prominent. After the 2014 Color Revolution, Ukraine began to lose its autonomy and sovereignty, and an atmosphere of civil war developed.

Instability i.e. the musical cheer of power

It is hoped and trusted that political change will take certain initiatives to change the cultural and economic-social structure and raise the standard of living of the common people by properly protecting and mobilizing the physical resources and assets within the country. Acquiring the existing political and social context, new discoveries and researches are conducted for economic and social transformation.

This means that not every political change is completely grounded, but it tends to create new ones in opposition to the existing meaning of the political structure. A change of power alone is not enough to bring about a complete change or economic and social transformation, a blueprint for fundamental change must be drawn - as was drawn by the French and Soviet revolutions.

Politically, economically, socially and culturally, all the juinas of the coalition state had been destroyed, which has been discussed enough. Looking at this, the sponsors of the Zen-G movement went to the rehearsal on August 23 to grab the wrist of the state administrator. But as soon as he shook it a little, the power fell like a rotten floor. The non-governmental organization called We Nepal, which claims to be the sponsor of the

movement, the Barbara Foundation connected to it, and even the real sponsor players behind it, are being revealed one by one. They were not looking for an immediate change of power. But to understand that they were making strong preparations for the color revolution, it can be judged from the events that took place this time.

Gen-G movement's two demands (freedom of social media and eradication of corruption) alone will not solve the existing problems in Nepali society. In other words, they have no policies, plans, or institutional procedures to overcome the imbalance of power seen in the existing society, the disparity in the distribution of economic returns, the long-term exodus due to industrialization and lack of employment, the serious failure seen in the education and health sectors and the exodus of young manpower, the decline in the production sector including agriculture, the failure of foreign policy, the frustration prevalent among the common people in the areas of livelihood and security.

nor the people behind them to run the campaign. The arson and looting of public property linked to the movement has put the country on the weakest ground ever. Who is responsible for that? Who will punish it? Is there any responsibility for the power and the person claiming to hold the reins of power for this public loss or not?

A revolutionary politician must have certain responsibilities, certain commitment or commitment to the masses. Political commitment is not as easy as starting a private journey after consulting one or two people. In the context of Nepal, it is to start a journey of public interest for 30 million people. The community and the overall society is a leading.

is the dream and institutional management agenda to make the country with a revolutionary revolutionary. However, there is no point that leads the story of Jane's carrier (?) The character of the state is leading the state right now. I did not have to bear such a straight and looting of the middle of the election. & Nbsp;

Prime Minister Sushilila Karki is ending, no one can tell me right now. However, much depends on how she treats her with disagree with her uncomposition. How does not only the last loot and involved in the forward, how did she take an inactivity of the reserves of the Kingdom protection, not only and not only in the future security? How to strengthen in relation to India, China and the United States.