The constitutional politics of the country is not only drawn up correctly, the actors who are responsible for its implementation must also be able to work according to the letter and spirit of the constitution. Democracy gets a chance to be institutionalized only when the leadership level responsible for institutionalizing democracy is qualified, honest, accountable to the people and ethical.

If not, the country will always remain in a state of constitutional/political fluidity. Politics with only power in mind, self-centered and faction-centered leadership will only spoil the country, and one day it will end itself politically. 

Politics based on cheap popularity and 'radical' thinking will only harm the system and society. State administrators need to be more qualified, visionary and responsible than others. After taking responsibility, learning and running the state no longer works. The country's constitutional politics cannot find meaning and stability without a strong commitment to the values of democracy and the rule of law among people at every level and level of state administration.

In the past, there has been a lack of commitment and honesty towards democracy and constitutional practice at the political level. The lack of dedication to the country, to the constitution and to the Nepalese people was seen. There was a lack of awareness of how to move forward while developing the constitution safely . Because of this, responsible political practice could not take place and the country had to experience constitutional/political instability one after the other. Even now, if there is no responsible political practice in the country, if the lesson is not learned from the mistakes made in the past, if the country is not in a position to maintain good governance and take the trust of the general public, and if it is not able to give delivery, then it cannot be said about the political stability of the country. 

The political change of 2007 was an epochal change. The change that took place with the participation of the general public from every level of Nepali society and Tapka had built a strong foundation of national unity. That change established for the first time in the history of Nepal that the basis of state management is the consensus, participation and decisiveness of the people. Unfortunately! Due to the apolitical and regressive thinking of some opportunistic and reactionary people who only consider the monarchy and the politics of power and power as a major traditional force of the change of 2007, the achievement of the historical change of 2007 could not be institutionalized . Change was defeated because of the wrong role of those fighting for change. 

In 2015, King Mahendra issued the Constitution of the Dominion of Nepal, 2015, with the aim of remaining decisive in the power of the state after creating a situation where the constitution could not be formed in recognition of the declaration of the 2007 revolution. All the political parties of the country accepted that constitution, which has adopted democratic values to a large extent, and can be institutionalized through practice. All major political parties participated in the first general election announced under the same constitution. Nepali Congress, the main political party of Nepal, managed to get a two-thirds majority in the elections. A popular influential government was formed with the participation of representatives elected by the people. 

The government formed in this way was working effectively and legally. The popular government, which was formed with a broad mandate in the interests of apolitical thinking, external provocations and some opportunistic regressive individuals who did not want to stay within the limits of the constitution declared by themselves, was deposed unconstitutionally on December 1, 2017, before reaching 18 months. King Mahendra took the entire kingdom power in his hands . Suspended the constitution issued by himself . The unconstitutional step of King Mahendra not only deprived Nepal of a popular, visionary and responsible leader committed to democracy, but also deprived of a historic opportunity to strengthen democracy institutionally and develop the country in all aspects. The country wasted 30 years of important time on the false comment that the development of the country is possible only under the active leadership of the king, not with the participation of the people.

Especially in the year 2033, after BP Koirala returned home with the policy of national reconciliation, King Birendra had the opportunity to move the country forward in the direction of restoring democracy through the third amendment of the Panchayat Constitution, taking into account the results of the referendum. That is, it was an opportunity to correct the wrong steps taken by his father and lead the country on the path of democratization. However, he did not want to do that and the country was forced to implement the independent panchayat system until 2046. The opportunity to restore democracy on the basis of peaceful and national consensus was also lost here. 

The public movement of 2046 was announced while the country was under economic blockade of India. After the success of the political change in 2046, the Constitution of the Dominion of Nepal, 2047 was issued with the consent of the major political forces of the country to institutionalize it. In recognition of addressing the politics of violence that started in the country from the year 2052 against the constitution and the constitutional system and the unconstitutional declaration of direct rule by the king on January 19, 2059, the House of Representatives was re-established under the constitution, and that constitution was abolished by the political declaration. Here too, the Constitution of the Dominion of Nepal, 2047 ended due to serious deviations in the king and political parties who were supposed to implement and follow the constitution. 

In spite of some weaknesses of the constitution, working as a document of broad consensus, approved by the people through repeated voting, assimilated by the elected representatives of the people, the front row of the political leadership of the time abolished it and announced the Interim Constitution of Nepal, 2063 .

After the political change of 2062/063, with the aim of institutionalizing that change, it has been 10 years since the Constitution of Nepal was promulgated in 2072 with the recognition of the system of 'federal democratic republican parliamentary governance'. During this period, two successful periodical elections have formed the basis of state operation legally. The overall governance system of the country has been created by the people's representatives who are elected by the people. This is a great achievement for the strengthening of democracy in general. 

To address the challenges of the Nepalese society based on diversity, to move the country towards more democratization and to build a just society, the 'pluralism-based multi-party competitive federal democratic republican parliamentary governance system' adopted by the Constitution of Nepal is a suitable political arrangement for the country . Nepal has no choice but to be restrained and implement it effectively. 

After the establishment of democracy, the country has not made extensive progress in every field. If the country did not have to face the situation of armed rebellion for 10 years, great earthquake, blockade and the outbreak of covid during this period, the country would have been able to develop and improve more in every field. But now it is not possible to reassure anyone by showing these difficulties of the past . Therefore, the major organs and mechanisms of the state, which are responsible for the implementation of the constitution, should be able to work effectively . Necessary laws, policies and programs should be made as soon as possible and the attention of the state should go to their effective implementation. 

Political determination had to be seen to calm the common people by addressing the situation of dissatisfaction and chaos that is expanding widely due to the lack of good governance in the country . It is necessary to put a stop to the apolitical and counterproductive thinking and behavior of capturing the state apparatus on a party basis by keeping skilled, businessmen, honest and qualified people. The trend of agreeing only for power, power and security has created a situation of widespread dissatisfaction in the need to focus on advancing the country by forming a national consensus for nation building. 

So-and-so has become the prime minister so many times, so if we do politics with the belief that I should surpass him and become the prime minister, the political height of the leadership will never increase . BP Koirala could be the Prime Minister only for 18 months. But we still remember him today!

To some extent, cheap popularity politics, irresponsible use of social media, unemployment, sponsored anarchy are causing confusion and instability in the society, but the main reason is the government's incompetence . For which all political parties are somehow to blame . 

If we are responsible to the people and rise above party interests and run the state with competence and efficiency and guarantee good governance, delivery and equitable distribution of opportunities, there are ample grounds for the country to move forward. Even though the constitutional and political structure is correct, it is not yet possible to say where the country will be led by the confusion, dissatisfaction and anarchy created by the lack of ability of the political leadership to communicate with the general public and reassure the people.