A capricious ruler does not pay much attention to the welfare of the people. He does not even have to mobilize the state machinery in the issue of public welfare. In a country like ours, the question of accountability has become even weaker and neglected. In such a situation, the two main aspects of good governance, the ruler and the administrator collude, 'white collar crime' (white-collar crime) grows and blooms under the nose of the ruler.

Our administrators are used to accepting the illegal instructions of the ruler as a Brahmo statement to kill the position of profit in the mistrust of the ruler. Due to the tendency to include the public administration in terms of private interests, there has been a close relationship between the ruler and the administrator in the country. From its womb, several big criminal and financial gain scandals like 'visit' visas have started to happen regularly and as state destiny. 

The issue of disease, hunger and grief that should be solved in a welfare state is only an issue of election assurance, and they are the state-supported administrators in the role of implementing every criminal act of our ruler.

Administrators who are ready and ready to be as fast as they can in following the professional religion and are always ready to be naked and naked against the concerns of civil service - those administrators are on the interesting list of the ruler. In the past, those who have been falling into jobs by buying Khats, we can see the scene of them holding the important responsibilities of the state. 

In the past, sending the recipient of a corruption letter to the airport would make it easier to implement the criminal scheme of the 'visit' visa. It does not seem to be possible to destroy this kind of 'setting' which is prepared for committing crimes only with the existing state structure.

It is Charandas administrators who suggest opportunities for financial gain even at the inconvenience of the common people. Plans for lucrative income from applying the rules of passport, license, national identity card with some new conditions were also put forward for 'trapping', i.e. the opportunity to profit from inconvenience.

Due to the exploitation of their own clients and the exploitation of criminals, the full capacity and mobilization of the state machinery are the incidents that have come to the surface lately. 

If the criminal environment prepared by the administrator under the guise of the ruler is to be investigated and legal accountability and a sound political environment are to be maintained in the country, it is necessary to prepare and implement an investigative strategic plan. But the irony is that this kind of strategic plan of investigation can be prepared and implemented only with the involvement and readiness of the state, so it is meaningless to believe and imagine that such incidents will be investigated and investigated from the existing character and face of the state. However, it seems appropriate to discuss the issue even if it is for the purpose of public curiosity about the impact of the incident and how to create a broad field of research. 

A valid permit given by a particular nation to travel within its own country - a 'visit' visa. It is not a criminal act in itself. It is the responsibility of the country issuing the visa to investigate the consequences of using or misusing the said facility and punishing it according to the immigration law. Therefore, the use or abuse of the visit visa cannot be a subject of investigation but the provision of 'visit' visa is operated as a larger networking for personal gain and the client is turned into a chepuwa 

The main criminal act of this incident and prohibited by law is the act of earning money in other ways. If this crime is to be considered as an incident of financial gain and a kind of 'extortion' to the customer, it is necessary to widen the circle of investigation to investigate the incident.

For this purpose, a separate research expert team should be appointed at the place where the user of the 'visit' visa is, in cooperation with the researchers of the relevant country, and a policy of secretly conducting the research should be adopted.

In the nature of this crime, it is victimless, i.e. those who want to go illegally and hand over the money, as the complainant does not cooperate with the investigation, it is necessary to pay special attention to the protection and privacy of the victim. 

Since this crime is related to transactions and business, a separate research group should be formed with knowledge of financial transactions and digital technology, and attention should be paid to data collection from the beginning. Since the nature of the event is the type of event that leads from data to facts, special emphasis should be placed on data collection.

If widespread social pressure cannot be created in this incident, the investigation will not reach the level of giving promises and protection. Therefore, a strategy should be adopted to communicate the facts pointed out by the research from time to time for the information of the general public.  In any case, given the scale, nature, criminal procedure and risk-taking position of the

crime, it cannot be assumed that it could have been solely on the discretion of the administrator. However, according to the provisions of the Organized Crime Act, in order to confirm the matter that cannot be accepted, ``plea bargaining'' i.e. according to the provisions of the Organized Crime Act, methods and psychological pressure must be used to force the administrator to open up to the ruler and reveal the facts.

The administrator commits criminal acts as ordered by the ruler, as a result, the ruler takes a large part of the profit, but the responsibility for criminal liability is imposed only on the head of the administrator, so the ruling class is determined to commit these kinds of organized economic crimes. 

In some cases, including the Sudan scam case in the police, it seems that only the administrator who takes a large part of the profit and operates the entire plan of the incident is the one who is the guilty party. Not being able to rise above the mentality that the ruler will save again and avoiding the weapons of state 'setting' in many cases in the past, the successful administrative class does not want to take the risk of going against their masters i.e. the ruling class.