Kathmandu is still the epicenter of the power struggle. Rapid ejaculation in theory and practice has become a part of Nepali politics. Therefore, the reality may be different from the statement that is circulated in the official media. What is said is not done.

What is done internally is not spoken. The dual character of the party and the leader continues to be exposed between the addition and subtraction of political benefits . In this case, Kathmandu is hard to believe, if you don't believe it, there will be no happiness.

is a game of possibilities Kathmandu . But no possibility is permanent . Therefore, Kathmandu is also a field of constant struggle. This is also heard about Kathmandu. Sometimes the power came out of someone's bag and sometimes it came from external power. But both the bag and the bag are a struggle. What seems simple in the struggle for political power, turns out to be a simple line of political-geometry where the distance between two points is the longest . There is an episode in the

period epic Ramacharit Manas. Ram has returned to Ayodhya after exile. The townspeople are impatient to catch a glimpse of him. Rama will find out about this . It is said that, after that, he tries so hard that everyone feels that Ram is giving darshan to every person.  Tulsidas has written describing this situation, 'Amit Roop Praghe Tehi Kala Jatha Jog Mile Sabhi Kripala .' But in the field of politics, one character cannot surprise everyone . One day, the right politician's choice will be exposed. 

Former President Bidya Devi Bhandari has made it clear that there is no need to get permission from UML to meet the activists. On the other hand, UML's powerful president and Prime Minister Khadga Prasad Sharma Oli has disagreed with the attempt to throw stones inside the party from outside. Some people think that the present position of Oli and Bhandari is in the form of a simple line where the distance between the two points is long. There are still many who understand Vidya's activism in UML politics as a complex puzzle. What is the inner intention of the current prime minister about the former president's entry into party politics? Who else but him can interpret ?

Republic makes multiple investments for its president . The fact-checked information received from the state to the person and organization that has become the president, government secrecy, introduction from the military power, the best arrangement to enhance the personality, multi-option expenses for health . There is a specific goal behind doing this. When any descendant of the people becomes the head of state, the nation can receive the highest service from him during the stipulated term. After retirement, it is expected that he will be seen with a common legacy that connects everyone. This is the era associated with the presidential institution. Shitalaniwas is a republican trust that should be a symbol of intelligence, integrity and commitment for the progress of the country.

After retirement from the presidency, security, sustenance, construction of the secretariat, treatment, etc., are also the motives behind these considerations. The experience acquired after becoming the president, the identity and prestige gained, the legacy acquired, the acceptance gained from a diverse society, etc. may seem like personal strengths of that person, but basically it is the national human capital that has become available. A republic does not rest on false superstitions . It runs on logic, facts, dialogue, understanding and constitutionalism. Therefore, it is not unreasonable for ordinary citizens to expect some values ​​from the retired head of state .

This is a question of ethics rather than flipping the pages of the constitution to see whether a person who has become president can be active in party politics or not. The person who was vice president a while ago has returned and has become a humble warrior of the party cycle. Couldn't anyone stop ? Didn't it happen somewhere? The argument that they stopped taking state-provided services has been dismissed. Politicians do not follow a straight path . Bangotingo, walking uphill is interpreted as leaping.  The incarnation of the former vice president's party politics did not happen suddenly. Personal choice also has its dignity .

Let's go back to Vidya Bhandari. She presented herself as a UML representative during her recent trip to China. Right now, not even a leaf within the UML moves without Khadga Prasad's signal. In this case, a UML member of the cabinet was sent as the transport minister of the former president. Now they are throwing polite jabs at each other . Bhandari did not reach the highest position of the state only by carrying the burden of the succession of the people's leader Madan Bhandari . Obviously, this was the result of the determination of Khadga Prasad, the supreme commander of UML. Naturally, it was Dalit leader Rampreet Paswan's turn to rise to that position. But Vidya Bhandari's ascension to the Matsya Nyaya within the party created history . In the internal life of UML, Khadgaprasad-Vidya has set many records in the last decades of unwavering companionship.

Bhandari's political activism is interpreted by some as Plan B of the UML incumbent. Dismissal of the age limit debate from the upcoming legislative session. Taking the reins of UML again as long as health is favorable. In the current situation, no one is ready to become the next Bhim Rawal . Since now, cymbal beaters have started to show creativity in their own style after understanding the pace of time. Another group claims that Vidya Bhandari will be reborn within the UML in the name of the abstract roadmap of left unity after Madhav Nepal's Tezovadh. One or more warriors within the UML will accept the fate of 'shared daughter, Vidya Bhandari' unconditionally. There are no few analysts in the power corridor of Kathmandu who sometimes start to threaten the established leadership from the characters who have brought it up by themselves.

Bhandari sometimes says that he is integral with UML and sometimes says that he does not need permission from anyone to meet the party workers . In this case, a line of Kaifi Azmi's song is relevant, 'Milo na tum to hum nerbae, mille to ankh churae, hume kya ho gaya hai.' What is the relationship between UML and Bhandari today? It cannot just be an internal matter within a particular party . UML is a key factor in bringing the republic, it is a key factor in bringing the current constitution. UML has given the country a president initiated by him. So what does UML want and think?

Confusion-centered UMA doesn't seem to have much room for hope as politics moves forward. If this party cannot provide the autonomous place that society needs, then there is a risk that they themselves will be part of the process. Every post, character and background has started to take the form of a deliberate political culture that carries the baggage of its partisanship. Partisanship is also affecting public life . Vidya's activation in the UML is raising an alarm. Umalegan who are ready to play Dundubhi must now open their mouths . What kind of fear binds a republican party like UML to talk about activation and the protectionist political practice that has grown up under its guise?

What will Vidya Bhandari do? What 'ideology' is she involved in building? What values ​​is she committed to establishing and institutionalizing? One can dream of a strong left party, a leftist Nepal and finally a leftist constitution. One can combine . Can devote himself . But it must be accepted calmly, this constitutional flow cannot be imagined by the activism of a former president . Such silence of other political forces who believe in republicanism when the republic is attacked by the person who has taken oath of it is certainly not helpful for building a dynamic Nepalese society . At a time when the power of groups that want to partisanize the entire country, state and society is increasing, standing in a 'comfort zone' and 'selective  Activism' cannot be done . It is not just the downfall of a certain character that the character who has given guardianship to the country above the party and the idea, starts shedding that weight. So what is being said here is that the 'nut-bolt' of the ideological construction of the republican society has been loosened somewhere.