After the historic first meeting of the Constituent Assembly on 15th June 2065 ended the 240-year long monarchy and declared a democratic republic, the royalists' show of power in the capital for the first time has created a serious political wave. On the eve of Democracy Day, former King Gyanendra's display of power when he returned to Kathmandu with an 'appeal to help himself to save the nation' has given a meaningful signal and message.

 The show of power, which seems to have been a long political and technical choreography, has left the former monarchs and monarchists extremely excited, while the mainstream parties have been more reactive and defensive than necessary. Now the royalist, right-wing and populist and mainstream parties are challenging each other and accusing each other. The Samajwadi Front of the Maoist, Samajwadi and other parties is preparing to demonstrate another power in the capital on the 15th against the monarchy and in favor of the republic.

Is it possible to restore the monarchy like the current debate going on in social networks and digital platforms? Are the people looking for an alternative to the republic? Was direct rule by a king better than a democratic republic? Has nationalism and national interest weakened in the democratic period? Is there no economic development? Is the country stuck in the swamp of misrule and corruption? What do the facts and figures of the political, economic, social, cultural and development and governance of about 30 years of monarchy and about 35 years of democracy indicate? On the basis of these facts and data, an informed debate has become indispensable to resolve such conflicting and complex questions. 

The cooperation between democracy and monarchy failed 

Rajas were captives of Ranas for 104 years. In 2007, the existence of the monarchy was restored after the establishment of democracy through the people's revolution led by the Congress. But since the establishment of democracy in 2007, King Tribhuvan and Mahendra have been conspiring against democracy because they wanted to rule actively.

Congress founder BP Koirala was a constitutional monarchist. He tried till the end of his life for constitutional monarchy and multi-party democracy. But failed. King Mahendra staged a 'coup' against democracy on January 1, 2017 by jailing a liberal democrat and constitutional monarchist leader like BP. In this way, the authoritarian Mahendra hijacked democracy and established an autocratic Panchayati regime. 

Even after the restoration of democracy through the people's movement of 2046, the constitutional monarchy and multi-party democratic system were followed again. But from the moment democracy was restored in 2046, the palace was constantly conspiring to make democracy fail. As a result of the same conspiracies, on January 19, 2061, King Gyanendra ended the democratic system and started active monarchical rule.

The reality of running an autocratic regime by imprisoning political party leaders and suspending all rights of Nepali citizens including political rights, freedom of expression and press, human rights is as clear as the sun. Analyzing on the basis of the said reality, the democracy that was established due to the sacrificial struggle of the people crashed both times because of the authoritarian and autocratic ambition of the king himself, not because of the political parties. The alliance between constitutional monarchy and multi-party democracy failed because of the king himself.

In the context of Nepal, the cooperation between democracy and constitutional monarchy has failed both theoretically and practically. The role of former king Gyanendra is also responsible for the establishment of the republic in 2065. Therefore, the restoration of the monarchy is neither necessary nor possible, nor is it the wish of the Nepali people. Monarchists have been claiming that monarchy is necessary in Nepal as well, giving examples of advanced and prosperous democratic countries such as Britain, Japan, Norway, Sweden, and Belgium. But not because of the monarchy, but because of the democratic system and appropriate policies of the government, those countries have developed. The kings of those countries are ceremonial heads of state without conspiring against democracy. Where they conspired against democracy, a republic was established as in France.  Nationalist

, who is a traitor?

Monarchist, right-wing, reactionary and conservative sections have been charged with two sharp accusations. First, after the establishment of the Federal Democratic Republic, nationalism has been weakening and the country is moving towards fragmentation. Secondly, the government and the parties have surrendered to the foreigners and committed treason by not being able to protect the national interests and national interests. It is necessary to conduct an objective study-research about the accusation based on the definition of nationalism and national interest, historical facts and the achievements of the monarchy and democratic period. Let's start the

, with the definition of nationality. In the era of liberalism, pluralism and globalization like the twenty-first century, the traditional definition of nationalism with geographical boundaries and state-centeredness has changed. But even today in Nepal, there is such a controversy due to the prevailing traditional, narrow and liberal definition. To address such controversial debates, it is first necessary to adopt a new definition of nationality. According to the new definition, nationality means not only geography and borders, but people are equally important.

After being transformed into a federal democratic republic, Nepal is no longer a nation or a state, but a nation-state. According to the definition of political science, a nation is an ethnic and cultural unit, while a state is a political and administrative unit. Similarly, the nation-state is the concept of a holistic, advanced and liberal state created by the development of ethnic and cultural and political and administrative units. Therefore, a liberal and inclusive principle that embraces the multiplicity and diversity of a multi-religious, multi-ethnic, multilingual, and multicultural society like Nepal and unites the people in a formula of emotional unity is the appropriate definition of nationalism. 

Royalists have been claiming King Mahendra as the most nationalist. But in 1962, King Mahendra committed a coup d'état by allowing India to set up a military barracks in Nepali land Kalapani. The fact that he compromised even on sovereignty and geographical integrity with the aim of sustaining the panchayat system which was imposed by 'Ku' in 2017 is as clear as the sun.

Similarly, the 1965 secret arms treaty with India was also made during Mahendra's time. But the new map of Nepal was released after the establishment of the democratic republic, including not only Kalapani, but also Limpiyadhura and Lipulek, which he handed over to India. Is it treason to issue a new map including the Nepali land handed over to India by the king? Nepal's national interest, border encroachment, independent and balanced foreign policy based on national interest, unequal treaties and other issues became the subject of national debate only after the establishment of democracy in 2046.

Geographical integrity, sovereignty, independence and national security were agreed upon during the monarchy period or during the democratic period? Was the coup d'état done under the direct rule of the king or during the democratic period for the sake of power? The national interest and national interests were affected because of the king or because of the democratic government? No matter how much propaganda is done to create a negative comment towards the democratic republic, nationalism has not weakened and national interests and national interests have not been compromised.

Nepal's nationalism has been strengthened during the democratic period. There has been further promotion and promotion of national interests and national interests. In today's era, the symbol or guardian of nationalism is not the king, but the sovereign people. The era of trading power by exploiting the emotions of the people with exaggerated slogans of nationalism and nationalism has come to an end. 

Democracy and the achievement of the monarchy

There is no question of comparing the monarchy and democracy in terms of political freedom and democratic rights. From the economic and social point of view, it seems that there has been a significant achievement in the democratic period. The biggest challenge was the inherited ailing economy of the Panchayat. But since 2048, the economy was revived due to the liberal economic policies followed by the Congress government. According to the World Bank, in 2048 the population below the absolute poverty line was about 49 percent, but now it is about 20 percent.

When King Mahendra took power in 2017 after ousting the democratically elected government, the average per capita income was US$50. During the 30 years of King's direct rule, per capita income rose by only $135 to $185 in 2047. Therefore, during the monarchy, Nepal was poor and the Nepali people lived a miserable life in poverty. According to the Central Statistics Department, the per capita income has increased significantly in 2079 and reached 1,456. 

In 2047, Nepal's human development index was only 0.399 but now it has reached 0.601. In 2048, the average life expectancy of Nepalis was only 54 years but now it has reached 71 years. In the year 2048, the literacy percentage was only 50% but now it has reached 76%. In 2048, only 36 percent of the population had access to drinking water, but now it has reached 88 percent. In the year 2048, the number of secondary schools was only 1 thousand 959 but now it has reached 10 thousand 664. In the year 2048, the primary school enrollment percentage was 64% but now it has reached 97%. In the year 2048, the number of health posts was only 1 thousand 98 but now it has reached 3 thousand 794.

In the year 2048, only 7 thousand 330 km of roads were built but now it has reached 98 thousand 488 km. In the year 2048, 4,616 km of tarred and gravel roads were built, but now it has reached 43,226 km. In 2048, only 9 percent of people had access to electricity, but now it has reached 95 percent.

In the year 2048, only 227 megawatts of electricity was produced, but now 3000 megawatts of electricity have been produced, while projects with a capacity of about 3000 megawatts are under construction. After the construction of the international transmission line and the electricity trade agreement with India and Bangladesh, it has now reached the stage of selling electricity to India and Bangladesh. Therefore, qualitative leaps have been made in poverty reduction, economic development, human development, physical infrastructure and development of electricity, telecom, banking and financial institutions, not in the monarchy period, but in the democratic period.

In 2048, foreign direct investment was about one billion. But it has increased 32 times in thirty years and has now reached 32 billion annually. International trade increased from 26 billion in 2048 to 21 billion now. Likewise, in 2026, Nepal is being upgraded from underdeveloped to developing country. This is a milestone in the democratic period in terms of development and economic development. 

Why did people come to the streets?

Political, economic, social, and cultural achievements were remarkable in the democratic period, but why did the people take to the streets for the first time after the establishment of the republic? It was not unusual for the question to arise. The problem is not only in the pre-monarchy, monarchist and monarchist period, but also in the republican, democratic and populist period. If not, such serious questions would not have arisen even two decades after the establishment of the Republic. 

But the people did not come to the streets in opposition to the democratic republic and in favor of the monarchy like the current sponsored and exaggerated commentary. In the post-2046 democratic period and post-2063 republican period, the government, mainstream parties and the top leadership have become extremely unpopular because they have failed to deliver despite having many opportunities. There is not only dissatisfaction among the people towards them, but also widespread public anger and disgust. It seems that the people have taken to the streets as a result of this dissatisfaction, anger and disgust. People are against the government, mainstream parties and the top leadership rather than the king and the monarchy. Therefore, this is not a failure of the republic, democracy and the constitution, but a failure of the government, the mainstream party and the top leadership. 

If there is reform and transformation in the mainstream party, Purvaraja and monarchism are not a problem. The government, the mainstream parties and the top leadership are the people's caution and warning for reform, transformation and delivery. The problem is not in the mirror, The longer the party and the leadership line accept the reality in their face, the more damage will be done. It is inevitable that the republicans and democrats seriously assimilate and self-examine this harsh reality. But if the mainstream party is not corrected and transformed, other nature may be created and challenges that can be unimaginable accidents can be unimaginable accidents.

is not likely to take the form of movement as per the desires and the king's wisdom. It will be limited as a group that welcomes the prelive and the protest of the government. Najraja is Yuvraj, Rajendra is Rajendra or Kamal? There is no possibility even if a shower is formed. These characters were only a panic shy, but not the garden. The controversial and division of disputes in the court of pure residence will be more vulnerable to the kingist campaign. & Nbsp; Avoiding

Power Demonstration and Avoidance of Public Leadership of Public Terms, the human relationship towards the national flag of religion, and King Birendra's popular utility. Only by unvered in Kathmandu and came to Kathmandu, not only RPP and Rags, with the national flag of the national flag. Kathmandu, Maya Bahane Shah used strategy to attract the people in particular, using the national flag in the last local elections. Even now, the ancestralism and the king seems to adopt the same strategy. The Indra Munction of Ripration on the

but is not likely to reflection on religion or any elite cover. No matter how biblical power displays the power, the monarchy is not likely to restore the monarchy.

Panchayat, the followers of the palace, the palace, the followers of the palace, no matter how much the constitution has conspired against the democratic republic and constitution. But it is not a crisis being created as a sudden crisis, political instability, vogencies and series of corruption. The government and the party had to be answered not by the government, not a political speech, and the king's people, not by the power of power in the street. The partial influence of anti-government-protruding governments, the siegevasmist, Papulist Wahar of the global government was unnatural. & Nbsp;

are non-misconscious and problems in the Republican system. But flaws, weakness, and problems created during the practice of democratic system and development are solved by the democratic process. There are mitigation and problems in the democratic system of UK, US, Japan, Australia, India such as Britain, US, Australia, India. But even those countries have been solving these problems through democratic and constitutional process. & Nbsp;

& NBSP; concluding stoYY-BREAK is in a positive direction, no matter where the stories of stora-Break is uplined and disputed. The people do not seek a choice of democratic republic and constitution even if there is no exaggerations from the right wing monarchy and regrating process. Democracy cannot be a monarchy and not. Nepali citizens, butter, butto, buttriya, buttically unconscious from the Ritis and the people, there is no unconditional unconventional in favor of the democratic republic.