On the eve of Democracy Day, former King Gyanendra Shah's public statement is clearer than before. Because he wants to establish his relevance under the guise of false commentary, he has kept it clear. The essence of his statement is - If you want to save the nation, support me.

In his previous statement, he used to depict the bad situation of the country. He used to say that the condition of the country is not what Nepali people want. He has repeated it this time too.

It is clear that the state of the country will never be as desired by the citizens, this argument also applies to the citizens of the powerful country America or Denmark, which is known for its good governance. The dimensions of people's desires in every country are different. When one desire is fulfilled, another desire is born . Therefore, Gyanendra's argument can be taken as a natural reaction of a citizen. It has been taken before.

In this statement, he has emphasized many wrong comments more.

He says- 'Today the country's history is being erased. The existence of Nepal is being destroyed.'

What is the erasure of history? In the past, Shah Khalak was glorified, orders were issued, prayers were offered, and tika was first applied in the name of the king in front of the door during Dasain. Is it said that it has been deleted? But in the last decade, history is found to be searched and understood from a new angle. In history, only the role of the king as a citizen is being explored. The interpretation of history seems to be more and more rich. Now who will frame the pages of history full of glorification of the king!

"Nepal's promising people are leaving the country every day" he argues. The word 'tanti' used by him has a wrong meaning . It lends credence to or encourages the one-sided claim of the 'royalists' that the country has become empty . Whereas, in this way the country is never empty . No country has been left empty .

The practice of Nepalis going abroad for study, visit or work is old. They used to go even during the king's time. If you look at the history of Lahure, there is a tradition of hundreds of years of going abroad for labor. It is not only a trend in Nepal, it is a trend in the world to go abroad. The world is getting smaller and smaller. People's travel abroad has become common. It is a common topic for citizens all over the world to go where the possibility of their personality development is more, where their income is more, personal convenience is more.

It is necessary to increase the chances of employment in the country. It is necessary to increase the quality in education and health. But no matter how much this country is made with facilities, the process of going abroad will not stop . There is no reason to discuss that those who went abroad to study or work abroad through the king yesterday. The mentality of "it's fine when I go, it's not good when others go" will be displayed.

Gyanendra says - 'It is a pity that those who say that the system has changed are not able to change the situation properly.'

Has the situation of Nepalis not changed? The facilities, purchasing power and per capita income of the Nepalese people have not increased in the year he was forced to leave the throne and in the current year. The facility of choice has not increased . People's confidence and career opportunities have not increased? Hasn't access to education, health, roads, electricity increased? Of course. And can it be said that the situation has not changed? Yes, it may not be as fast as expected, it may not be of good quality. All sections of the society may not have benefited equally. But to say that the situation has not changed is just short-sighted.

His claim that he has given up his position and comfort for the good of the people is also false. The good of the people that he did was evident in the days after 19th of January 2061 .

It seems that he has an illusion that the new generation who has not seen/experienced the bad times of that time can be attracted to him on the basis of wrong commentary. Today, the new generation who wakes up with the Internet, does their business with the Internet and sleeps with the Internet may not know that the Internet was cut at that time . While only a few people took advantage of it . Today's generation who get instant news from social media may not know that even the limited FM radio at that time was not allowed to be called news. It may not be known that an army officer became a 'super editor' sitting in the newspaper's office and controlling the information itself . Today's generation who always carry mobile phones in their hands may not know that the mobile service was blocked at that time . Free movement of people was controlled. It was difficult to go outside the country . Recruitment to the army was the government's priority over the appointment of teachers and health workers.

Was the welfare of the people possible then or now ?

He had not given up. After the 19th of January, he practiced the kind of autocratic rule that he learned from Babu Mahendra, and he bowed to the strength of the people's movement to get rid of it. He left no stone unturned to suppress the people's movement. When they could not, they bowed down to the people . Obviously, if he had not accepted his defeat on 2063 Baisakh 11, Narayanhiti would have been captured. There is no need to remind him of the possible situation at that time. Because he was aware of that on Baisakh 11 and fulfilled the demand of the people's movement.

He is now saying 'our desire to include everyone' . They are saying, "Let us gain the awareness to move forward by correcting the shortcomings of the past and the mistakes against our nature and culture". Does he care about the behavior of the political parties who received the votes and mandate of the people during his reign ? Isn't it ridiculous that the then king who did not even give the leader of the party a land to stand on in the Ratnapark, said that it was his privilege to take everyone away? As far as correcting the error is concerned, he has spent that period . After the belief that 'the king does not make mistakes' has been violated, the situation has become that there is no longer a king. Mainly, he has not apologized to the public regarding his mistakes. A conscientious person should have the courage to apologize for his mistakes before giving advice to others .

He has used the word democracy 15 times in his statement. It has been predicted . But he does not have the moral strength to glorify democracy. Because, he tried to destroy the democratic institution with the force of the army. The activities of political parties were made a crime. By taking away the right of the citizens to elect the government, they started the practice of self-inoculation. He tried to implement the practice of applying to the palace instead of winning the trust of the people for the prime minister. Later, he himself became the "Chairman of the Council of Ministers". The Royal Commission was formed to supersede the Abuse of Authority Investigation Commission. A person who takes away the freedom of speech, assembly or association of the citizens during his active rule sings the praises of democracy.