In the recently concluded Nepal Premier League (NPL), one such group won, which was not mentally prepared to accept the victory in a particular circle. And the controversy was over. When the unsuspecting group actually made a bet, it was difficult to admit a competitive advantage.

When the prejudice is rooted in the psyche, some are recognized at the same level, when they try to surpass it, if it is not accepted at all, then it is discrimination. The sudden concentration of dissension against such distinctions as far as the countryside proved that the fire was not extinguished.

Satta Poshit Bhashya says that the Madhesh movement lost its leadership over time. The agenda that emerged with him swallowed him up. Jhilko, who appeared in the middle of NPL, said - 'Abhi hum zinda hai brothers and sisters, zinda hai! See what kind of rumors are being spread, but this will boost our morale even more. Hamara Andolan Rookne wala nahi hai.'

The commentators are laughing hard at the proof that there is a glimmer of movement in his statement. For them it is a matter of entertainment. But in his expression, his innocence and irony of the country are hidden. Dissenters against segregation come back to bite like Dubow, with twice the greenness. The NPL debate should be seen in the context of history.

There is still narrowness left in a circle. That narrowness manifested in the form of discrimination is a kind of politics. But the politics that is practiced in the name of the superiority of a particular community is not just racism, it is a foolish rebellion against the advanced values ​​of tradition and modernity. The issue is that who will win the war of conscience, equality and democracy? At one level it is also a self-contradiction of sexual thought.

More than this, it is a broader ideological struggle. Democracy cannot flourish by sweeping all sides under the carpet. When an atmosphere of 'I am less than you' is created with the oppressors, then the oppressors do not get that cover under the guise of power structures. When that happens, the perpetrators either resist or accept. All the components that negatively affect the health of the entire democracy are not only touched, but also covered.

was the essence of the Madhesi struggle - the change should first be in society, and then in politics or both together. Most of the Madhesi leaders were of the same opinion, the movement for social reform should be postponed during the struggle for ownership of the constitution. However, Madhesh gave a new twist to the national democratic struggle when the issue of federalism was added to it.

The problem with this movement was that its leaders did not allow it to go beyond a certain circle and other federalists considered it their duty to garland it. Communities that are on the fringes of the power structure have to face the challenge time and time again. Nepal is a country of diversity. Its nationalism should not be expressed in a single thought and structure, but with its diversity. Madhesh should not keep such racist thoughts in some corner of his mind when he opposes the racist abuse, it complicates the struggle to build an egalitarian society. 

Nepali language poet Gopal Prasad Rimal wrote a part of the poem entitled 'Parivartan' - 'Those who were living crying until yesterday, today they are ready to die laughing.' Many leaders emerged after great sacrifices during the struggle to establish the honor, freedom and security of Madhesh. In this long struggle, those who loved the motherland paid a heavy price.

Madhesh has expressed his respect for these warriors of change. However, some of these leaders put an adjective in front of their name to express the nature of their contribution. Madhesi politics saw the order of 'Messiah', which was followed by an unannounced competition among the blind devotees to impose that turban on their preferred leader. However, such an adjective spontaneously given by the common people reflects such an understanding. While expressing the power of political leadership, it acknowledges the centrality of his entire thinking.

who did the historic work of organizing people's power. Most people follow a predetermined path. It is a common thought that leaving the old ways and making your own licks is viewed negatively. But there are some who choose a new slogan for their problem and try to unite a target group.

At present, a strong comment is being spread that Madhesh politics has become gray. The cultivators of Bhashya are excited at the moment, pointing to those who have raised their feet and called themselves messiahs by spreading ashes. Such an atmosphere will arise after all the forces that can give rise to the political, social, cultural and economic dominance of the dominant community slow down. There is unrest in the permanent power circle.

The vessels made against the Madhesh movement have been washed with milk and sanctified with Ganges water. Those who undermine the Madhesi agenda have been made to wander around Madhesh by carrying a palanquin by the Messiah of Madhesh. Kathmandu has no reason to worry. In the analysis of Kathmandu, the waves of political challenges arising from Madhesh have mostly been canceled.

The traditional Nepali state, its rulers and the leadership class of political parties are still dominated by the centralized mentality. They still do not want to fully include oppressed classes, genders and communities in the state. Even now, the thought of compassion has not disappeared. The political appointments that are being made now show that this is a standard building process. It should not be forgotten that the Madhesh movement was the beacon of hope for the oppressed. It began to die out by being entangled in the labyrinth created by the dominant. 

Whether the power belongs to the old party or to the unestablished parties, it is a floor to be cut with a knife or a knife. If you don't know how to hold the ghee you get, the ghee will not fall on the plate. Madhesh will not be satisfied with the current one way. Those who fought for recognition, representation, access, share in natural resources and provincialism are waiting for a better day for the many deprived of the land. It is unlikely that the rising anger of ordinary citizens will be quelled by the downfall of their local leaders. The main problem of Madhesh is that the commitment is colored by vested interests.

Even under normal conditions, democracy is a difficult system. Its survival depends on the extent to which the ruler can withstand pressure from the opposition. The administrative system started adopting a totalitarian attitude right before the eyes of the leaders who fought for democracy. Only the process of true democracy can strengthen equality. In this the undeclared privilege of a particular community cannot last long.

After saying that the importance and role of different communities increases in democracy, as the trend of those communities declines, the number of that particular party increases. Therefore, the suffrage of these communities becomes a right to share in power rather than just the right to vote during elections. This basic quality of democracy leads to the elimination of the foundation of the undeclared privileged class. This creates a fear of democracy in this section, which has now surfaced in the form of voices against federalism. Still, due to discrimination and division based on some castes and communities, there is still a huge gap and imbalance in the access to opportunities provided by the state.

In order for citizens to have very close access to government, government should be where they can find it. The simple aspiration of the union and local as well as the state government to be elected is to have the presence of the government where the citizens find it. It is said that, from the point of view of political system, autocracy and democracy are two opposite poles. Continuity of autocracy can only be secured in status quo, but democracy can always be effective only in the process of change. Where the process of irrepressible change continues, there is no future for autocracy, and where the insistence on the status quo persists, there is no room left for democracy.