Discontent increased by the return of former Vice President Pun to the party

A person who has once reached the highest position of the state and has become the common property of all the people, again tries to become an ideal of a certain party and its workers or well-wishers, it seems that he does not understand the dignity of his previous position. At the same time, even while in office, it is understood that he did not perform his role in a fair and neutral manner.

Mangshir 23, 2081

Editorial

Discontent increased by the return of former Vice President Pun to the party

We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:

This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.

Nanda Bahadur, who retired with honor after serving two terms as Vice President, is now in the limelight again. He is being talked about not because of his experience as vice president or because of his new initiative to use the personality extended by that position, but because of his return to party politics.

 His former party Maoist Center is preparing to make him vice-president  He himself is saying that he has come to active politics and not to have doubts about it.

He has participated in the official meeting of the Maoist center. It is insufficient to discuss this issue only from the constitutional and legal angle. Basically it is a social and moral issue. In the light of that, the preparation of the Maoist Center and the Vice President should be discussed.

There are not many examples in Nepal about how the concerned person should continue his personal and social life after leaving the highest positions of the republic such as the President or Vice President. First President Ram Varan Yadav and Vice President Parmanand Jha are living private lives.

Vidyadevi Bhandari and Pun, who became President and Vice President after them, could take them as an example. But both of them are interested in party politics. The reactivation in the party itself is tragic. Because, in a society where reference and standards are low, the responsibility to establish it lies ahead. For that, Bhandari and Punak's comprehensive approach is required. 

requires thinking about how to broaden your personality and confession. Spread or shrink? Stay honorable or get caught in the daily controversy and criticism? The only thing that is sad about the republic is that this system is being attacked by its own charioteer.

It is argued that there is no constitutional and legal restriction when it is discussed that the former president or former vice president is active in the party. Of course not. It is neither possible nor necessary to write down the issues related to the morality and responsibility of the individual in the constitution and laws. The

is mainly for the unaccountable people who are constitutionally and legally bound. Restrictions are placed in the constitution and laws to prevent such actions, whether they do not live up to their dignity, have extra desires, or do unwanted actions. However, it is not considered necessary to impose such restrictions in the case of persons who have become guardians of the state like the former President/Vice President.

This is a social and moral issue. The question is what kind of practice should be established. Believe it or not, as soon as the term of the President or Vice President ends, it will look ugly if there is a trend of looking for a chair in the office of the former party? At this time, the behavior of Bhandari or Pun is not only a question of their personal freedom, but also a question of the dignity of the republic.

Therefore, a person who wants to reach the position of president or vice president in the future should also give up the desire to engage in active politics again. It is beneficial for the position and oneself not to aspire to such a position with the desire to do active politics in the future.

A person who has once reached the highest position of the state and has become the common property of all the people, again tries to become an ideal of a certain party and its workers or well-wishers, it seems that he does not understand the dignity of his former position. At the same time, even while in office, it is understood that he did not perform his role in a fair and neutral manner.

considers himself to be disrespectful to the position he has held. Whereas, even after leaving office, the speech and behavior of the former President/Vice President should be exemplary. Must be full of responsibility. So that people can take seriously the questions they raise. can be assimilated as a common personality. The discussion about Bhandari and Pun is exactly opposite to such expectations.

This topic is also connected with the future of the republic. The working style of the person who will be, being or has been president plays a role in increasing or decreasing the beauty of this system. Therefore, their speech and behavior should be such as to enrich the republic. But when active in a certain party, the institutions of the republic become more weak and unreasonable. It ultimately weakens the republic itself.

Re-introducing a person who has reached the highest position of the state into the party is also the beginning of a wrong practice. There is no right intention in this process. They are trying to bring in such people with the intention of becoming stronger in the factional fight within the party. The Maoist center itself is demanding the resignation of the chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal. At this time, they are trying to bring Pun into the party due to his activism.

because Pun was Dahal's confidant before becoming Vice President. Dahal may hope that bringing Pun into the party will strengthen his side in the leadership group. But his attempt to damage the dignity of the republic to make himself stronger is wrong.

On the other hand, if those who have received various opportunities from the party are re-introduced into the party in a controversial manner, the possibility of a new face for leadership within it shrinks. This trend narrows not only the party but also the scope of democracy.

Editorial

Link copied successfully