She clarified that a tiger that eats one cannot be said to have eaten another, and that actions taken by killing the law will ultimately lead to tyranny.
We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.
Acting Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Sapna Pradhan Malla has stressed that the judiciary should be free from any kind of fear, intimidation or political influence. Addressing a function organized on the occasion of Law Day, she called on the judges to dispense justice fearlessly. She made it clear that any attempt to make the judiciary ‘obedient’ or use it as a means of political self-fulfillment would not be acceptable. She warned against the tendency to weaken the principle of separation of powers and the rule of law. She said that all stakeholders should show the courage and commitment to stand against the conspiracy against the rule of law. She said that the killing of the law by a tiger that eats one cannot be said to have eaten another, and she made it clear that the killing of the law will ultimately lead to tyranny. These are the main 5 points of Acting Chief Justice Malla’s address.
Fair justice is not possible under fear and influence. I request all the justice workers to move forward with indomitable courage, free from fear and intimidation. I myself fought against discrimination and injustice throughout my life. The fight is still on. May it inspire us all to work with commitment for competent, fair and correct justice.
The question is being raised whether we are not making a malicious attempt to protect our own interests instead of making justice the final destination?
The question is being raised whether we are not trying to lay the foundation for the unequal use of the constitutional supremacy, freedom and sovereignty of justice under the pretext of using authority and law, making its bases and guarantees loose and inactive, and laying the foundation for an obedient judiciary and the rule of law?
By keeping the constitution as it is, there cannot be a revolution or change against the constitution. The appearance of the stakeholders of the constitution cannot be embellished by distorting it. The Constitution cannot be implemented faithfully unless those who violate it are held accountable against it.
