Congress President Sher Bahadur Deuba has put forward Ishwari Neupane, who is a person of his trust, in the Parliament's State Order and Good Governance Committee, which oversees the major organs and bodies of the state. Since there was no nomination against Neupane, who was a single candidate with the support of Congress and UML, it is certain that she will be elected unopposed.

The committee's meeting on Wednesday will formalize the selection of new members. His proponent is Congress MP Ramhari Khatiwada and his supporter is UML MP Krishnagopal Shrestha. The name of Neupane was agreed upon at the meeting held on Tuesday between Chairman Deuba, Deputy Chairman and General Minister. There was a long tug-of-war between Chairman Deuba and Chief Ministers Gagan Thapa and Bishwa Prakash Sharma on who should be nominated in the meeting. 

According to the report of the committee formed under the leadership of MP Jeevan Pariyar to investigate the fraud in the provisions related to the 'cooling off period' included in the Civil Bill, Party Chairman Deuba wanted to bring Khatiwada back to the same role. In the meeting, when Deuba proposed the name of Khatiwada, Deputy Chairman Purna Bahadur Khadka and Home Minister Ramesh Ukhtar expressed their support. However, Chief Ministers Thapa and Sharma did not agree.

  After accepting the moral responsibility and resigning in the case of deactivating the 'cooling off period', it was the argument of Mahamantriduya that bringing Khatiwada in the same role would cause problems in running the committee and also cause trouble for the party. They put forward the name of another member of the committee, Dilendra Badu, instead of Khatiwada. However, Chairman Deuba did not want to discuss Badu's name. 

The 27-member State Arrangements Committee has eight members including Congress Vice President Khadka, Chief Minister Thapa and Sharma, along with MPs Dilendra Badu, Ramhari Khatiwada, Ishwari Neupane, Hridayram Thani, and Sarita Prasain. Although Neupane is a member of the committee, he is the chairman of the parliamentary hearing committee. There is a provision that the chairperson of the committee should be made from the members of the same committee. Deuba has reached the decision to send Khatiwada as the Chairman of the Good Governance Committee and make Neupane the Chairman of the State Arrangements Committee despite the other members in the committee as options. 

A Congress official said, "The chairman of the party took the name of Khatiwada, but the general ministers did not agree. suggested Badu's name. However, the chairman did not agree. Among the eight members in the committee, there was no possibility of becoming deputy chairmen and general ministers. In the remaining five members, the chairman did not trust other than Ishwari Neupane.' 

Due to the controversy within the Congress, the name of Neupane was finalized shortly before the nomination program scheduled by the secretariat at 1 pm. Neupane said that she got information about it only after the party decided. "The party may have decided to give this responsibility thinking that they can coordinate and reconcile everyone," she said, "There are challenges, on the other hand, this is also an opportunity." Therefore, the top leaders of each party are members of the committee. From monitoring the work of the Prime Minister and the Minister of Home Affairs to the functioning of major organs of state power such as the army, police, and authority, the interests of the leaders are also attached to this committee.

A member of the Congress says that the trend of finding people who are favorable to their own interest to run the committee is not only this time, but already. Deuba was looking for a suitable person in the matter of making the chairman of the committee because the interests of the leaders were connected from one angle or another in the Authority Bill, the Federal Civil Bill and the currently pending Police Bill. 

MP Hridayram Thani says that there has been an increase in the tendency to seek the agreement of major leaders on the bill. "The bill was first discussed in the committee. A law was made. There was no intervention of the Prime Minister. The ministers drafted the law so that corruption would be imposed on them. Passed by committee. There is an example in the past that the same law has landed itself in jail over time. The situation is not like that now," he said, "There is a tendency to bring agreement from the leaders on some key points of the bill." 

Thani said that the new chairman has many challenges. The 'cooling off period' in the Civil Bill created an uproar due to lack of proper study. The bill on the Constitutional Council has now gone to the President and has become controversial. The pending Armed and Police Act has similar problems. The Construction Materials (Management and Regulation) Bill is surrounded by other interests. Therefore, there is a lot of challenge for the new chairman to work," he said. 

Thani said that since the authority bill in 'coma' is still stuck in the committee, the challenge to move it forward lies with the new leadership. Although the bill was unanimously passed by the Thani-led sub-committee on December 4, the issue of whether or not the authority will be allowed to investigate the decision of the cabinet under the scope of policy corruption has now become the most complicated issue. Because of that, the committee is stalling the bill. 

"In the police bill, there are controversial issues such as leadership level tenure, promotion criteria, efficiency and efficiency are put before seniority," he said, "The most important issue is whether or not there will be a police under the province." Due to the central government, the province has not got a police yet. This seems to be the main challenge of how to pass the bill when questions are being raised about federalism.' He said that from the prime minister to the top leaders of every party, ministers and heads of the administrative sector will be interested in this committee. Many cases come to this committee. For that, from the Prime Minister to the heads of the army, the police, and even the heads of the constitutional commission should be called and discussed.