Deepak Manange, who was declared ineligible to be a member of parliament, has been prevented from going to jail, since the Supreme Court failed to deliver the full text of the verdict on time, to Govindraj Joshi, who was found to be corrupt. Similarly, the government has alleged that the construction of many projects has been confused due to the lack of full text of the decision regarding development and construction registered under public concern.

According to the Decision Implementation and Law Division under the Prime Minister's Office, projects and work started with the investment of the government and private sector have been stopped due to the lack of full texts of some decisions of long-term importance.

The post was not vacant when Manange's transcript was not received. The Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court ruled that Deepak Manange is ineligible to be a Member of Parliament, but did not give the full text immediately. In this way, the government was not able to proceed with the election even though the constituency was vacant due to not giving the full text.

Manange was suspended by the Gandaki Provincial Assembly after the Supreme Court's decision but could not vacate the post. On 4 June 2082, the Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court ruled that Manange was ineligible to be a member of Parliament, saying that he had defied the Election Commission as a candidate. If a decision is made at

time, it is easier to interpret and implement it. Development, construction and the work that the government must implement immediately does not stop . If the full text does not come on time, it will take a long time and complicate the implementation. - Deputy Attorney General Sanjeevraj Regmi 

Rajeev Gurung (Deepak Manange), who was a member of the Gandaki State Assembly, was released from office with this verdict as he was found guilty in the murder industry case. The Constitutional Bench headed by Chief Justice Prakashmansingh Raut found Manang guilty of becoming a Member of Parliament by falsifying details as he was ineligible to be a candidate. A bench comprising Chief Justice Raut and Justices Sapna Pradhan Malla, Kumar Regmi, Hariprasad Phuyal and Kumar Chudal ruled that even though the writ petitioner demanded that his post be revoked from the beginning, he would be relieved of his post from the date of the judgment.

The Supreme Court convicted Manange on 20 October 2081 of attacking and attempting to kill another gangster Nike Chakra Milan. Before that, he was convicted by the High Court of Patan. He did not review the decision and it was implemented because he got involved in politics. Manange appealed to the Supreme Court after his term expired and became an MP. But the Supreme Court upheld the decision of the High Court. Advocate Birendraraj Karki filed a writ stating that there is a legal provision that a person who has been convicted of a criminal charge and serving a prison sentence cannot become a candidate. Even though the Supreme Court has ruled that Manange is unfit to be a member of Parliament, the position has not been vacant due to the fact that the full text was not prepared.

Manange was unanimously elected in the state assembly elections held in November 2079. Manang's state assembly election 'B' was contested by Dorje Lama for the state assembly member along with Manang. Both Congress and UML supported Manange and did not field candidates. Manange had initially said that he would contest the election with the support of the ruling coalition. Manange was elected before the election after independent candidate Dorje withdrew his candidacy. Manange won as an independent candidate in 2074 as well.

Although the area is vacant after Manange's resignation, the Gandaki Provincial Assembly has not been able to write a letter to the Election Commission for the by-election. The reason for not being able to write a letter saying that by-elections should be held as the provincial assembly is vacant is because the full text of the verdict is not ready. The Supreme Court has said that it has been only two months since the verdict and the delay is happening due to the delay in the verdict in the constitutional bench. The government has prepared to hold by-elections in Rupandehi 3. Elections are about to be held in that area due to the death of RPP MP Deepak Bohora.

Since the Supreme Court did not prepare a complete decision, the government tried to hold elections in both Rupandehi and Manang regions at the same time, but it was not possible. Attorney General Ramesh Badal said that even though the election in both the vacant areas would be held at the same cost, the full text of Manange's judgment had not been received, and it had to be done separately. It was announced by the Supreme Court that Manange's post was vacant, but due to the lack of the full text of the judgment, the Provincial Assembly could not formally say that it was vacant. The Gandaki State Assembly Secretariat is confused about whether his post is vacant or not.

State Assembly Secretary Hariraj Pokharel said that he is waiting for the full text of the Supreme Court to decide whether or not Manange's post is vacant. "As the Election Commission is also confused, a letter came to inform us whether the post is vacant or not," he said. Pokharel said that the Secretariat of the Gandaki Provincial Assembly sent a letter to the Election Commission stating that 'without the full text of the Supreme Court, it is not possible to say whether the post will be vacant or not'.

Election Commission's Assistant Spokesperson Durga Prasad Chalise informed that the Commission has not received the vacancy letter in Manang State Assembly '2'. He said that the Election Commission had also sent a letter to the Gandaki Provincial Assembly in July stating that the election would not be held at once, but in response, it was informed that only Manange is under suspension and there is no vacancy, so preparations for the election in Rupandehi 3 have been made.

The Commission had asked the Gandaki Provincial Assembly in July. But the reply was received saying that since the full text of the Supreme Court was not received, it was not possible to say that it was vacant,' said Co-spokesperson Chalise, 'if it is vacant within this month, we will try to include it. If they do not come, we will hold an election in one area now, otherwise there will be an election in Manang later. Attorney General Badal said that if the Supreme Court prepares it soon, the election can be held at a single cost, so they are also looking for a full text.

The full text should be prepared and given immediately after the verdict.-Former judge 

Krishnajang Rayamazhi The government and the private sector are waiting for a full decision the most is the decision on whether or not hydropower projects can be built within national parks and conservation areas. On January 2, 2081, a constitutional bench consisting of five judges, including Chief Justice Prakashman Singh Raut, gave a verdict on the dispute over whether or not development can be built within the park. The bench of judges Sapna Pradhan Malla, Kumar Regmi, Hariprasad Phuyal and Manoj Kumar Sharma, along with the Chief Justice, said that the amendment to the law that allows development projects to be carried out in protected areas such as national parks and wildlife reserves will be repealed. The judges could not agree on this dispute, opinions differed. Four judges of the Constitutional Bench gave an opinion in favor of repealing the amendment in the National Parks and Wildlife Protection Act, while Malla held a different opinion. But everyone agreed to stop building large projects within the park. The summary judgment was made public but the full text was said to come later.

This decision was made in a writ filed against the government when it introduced provisions to conduct development projects in national parks and wildlife reserves while amending some Nepal Acts related to investment facilitation. As soon as the summary judgment order was made public, it became controversial. The businessmen protested saying that the verdict could stop power generation of about 20,000 megawatts. They submitted a memorandum to the Prime Minister and all political parties against the Supreme Court's verdict.

According to the decision of the Constitutional Court, the Independent Energy Producers Association of Nepal (IPPAN) claimed that the hydroelectric power generation that is being built and completed will be stopped. Their unanimous demand was that the government should review this decision. Due to the verdict given by the Constitutional Court, there was no further appeal to the Supreme Court. Therefore, the government asked the businessmen to wait for the full text and take a decision. But even after seven months of this decision, the constitutional bench has not been able to give the full text . The government is also waiting for the full verdict. Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli promised that the government would take a proper decision after pressure from businessmen.

Attorney General Badal claims that about 6 billion private sector investments are at risk because the full text of this verdict is not available. He informed that some projects had to be stopped as they were in the construction stage and even the completed projects could not be resumed. The government argues that construction materials such as cement have been stockpiled for the under-construction project, but these materials are becoming unusable and have started to deteriorate.

These two are just examples. The government has not been able to determine the tax due to the lack of full text not only related to development and construction but also tax related issues. The Attorney General's Office argues that the Supreme Court has not received the full text of the case in which it was found guilty in the fake VAT bill case for a year, which is why there is a problem in determining the revenue to be deposited in the government's account. In the case of fake VAT bills, Bhatbhateni department stores are not ready after the full text. Aarti Enterprises, Shrestha Imperial, Jagdamba Cement, Aakriti International and Pooja Overseas among others have been decided. Similarly, Niraj Gobind Shrestha has also been found guilty of tax evasion in the purchase of Ncell shares.

Apart from tax, the rulings of directives and mandates issued by the government in the national identity card dispute and other constitutional courts have not been prepared in full on time, according to the decision implementation division of the Prime Minister's Office. According to the data of the Supreme Court, 5 thousand 420 judgments are yet to be written in full. In the last financial year, 569 cases were left in the list to be written and the responsibilities were transferred. This number has reached 4 thousand 851 in this financial year. According to the data of the Supreme Court, 11 thousand 574 cases had to be decided by June 31, out of which 6 thousand 127 judgments had been prepared.

On the day of the final hearing of the case, the judge writes a summary of the decision in the opinion book after hearing the arguments of the parties to the case. A judgment is a summary written by a judge in an opinion book. But the short description of the judgment written in the opinion book is prepared by dividing the title section, facts section, judgment section and details section by adopting the legal format. It is said that a summary judgment is given on the day of judgment, while others are mentioned in full text.

In the full text, the summary judgment of the opinion book is confirmed by mentioning the punishment, compensation, fine or legal liability, explaining the basis and reason regarding whether the offense is established against the accused or not, whether the petitioner's demand is met or not.

Govindraj Joshi, who was found corrupt due to lack of full text, was sent back

Ex-minister Govindraj Joshi, who was found guilty in the corruption case due to lack of full text, was also sent back home by the Supreme Court. On 13 July 2081, the Supreme Court declared Joshi a corrupt person and sentenced him to 9 months imprisonment, fine and fine. After being convicted by the Supreme Court, Joshi went to the Supreme Court in the first week of August asking for the execution of the verdict. But the Supreme Court returned him.

Joshi came to the Supreme Court after hearing the verdict of the country's Supreme Court convicting him, saying that he should accept it. An employee of the Supreme Court said, "But the basis for arresting him was not complete. After the full verdict, he returned to contact the District Court's judgment execution unit." It has been a year since this judgment was passed but the full text has not been prepared yet.

Nirajan Paudel, the Supreme Court's right to information, claimed that the Supreme Court is speedily preparing all the full texts in the backlog, including Joshi's case. The Supreme Court bench of Justices Vinod Sharma and Balkrishna Dhakal found former minister and Nepali Congress leader Joshi guilty in the corruption case. Joshi appealed to the Supreme Court against the decision of the special court. In 2060, the Commission for Investigation of Abuse of Authority had filed a corruption case against former minister Joshi on the charge of acquiring illegal wealth. He was found guilty by special counsel. Joshi had appealed to the Supreme Court saying that the Special had adopted a wrong method while calculating the income.