Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli has to take a vote of confidence due to the activism shown by the authority, the decision given by the Supreme Court on the appointment of 52 constitutional officers and some political appointments made by the government, while Congress President Sher Bahadur Deuba is shaking.

Prime Minister Oli has to take a vote of confidence as the Civil Liberties Party separated from the government and withdrew its support. 

Civil Immunity has submitted a letter withdrawing its support to the government to Speaker Devraj Ghimire on Sunday. Arun Kumar Chaudhary, who has been the Minister of State for Tourism since Civil Immunity, is yet to resign. Chaudhary is preparing to submit his resignation on Monday as Prime Minister Oli returned to Kathmandu from Humla only late on Sunday. It is considered constitutionally approved after resigning from the government and resigning from the government. 

Article 100 (2) of the constitution has a provision that 'if the political party leading the government splits or the party participating in the government withdraws its support, a vote of confidence must be taken within 30 days'. At present, the Congress has 88 votes (one suspension), UML 79 (one suspension), JSPA 7, and LOSPA 4 in favor of the government in the House of Representatives. It does not seem that there will be an immediate crisis on the union and state governments when civil emancipation withdraws support from the government. But one side within the ruling Congress is constantly pushing for an alternative to the current alliance. On the other hand, Congress President Deuba himself is getting suspicious lately, so there is speculation about the alliance.

Congress president Sher Bahadur Deuba and Maoist president Pushpa Kamal Dahal held a formal/informal dialogue between the leaders who are close to them. The Congress has narrow options to form an alternative alliance if it so desires. A Congress alliance with Maoists (32), United Socialists (10, one suspension), Janmat (6), JSP (5), Civil Immunity (4) and LOSPA (4) will lead to a majority. But some Congress leaders have been arguing that such an option should not be taken by saying that if a coalition is formed by combining small parties, the government will become more unstable than the present one. 

Congress spokesperson Prakasharan Mahat said that even though there is some discomfort due to events such as the 'bargaining' of political appointments, the filing of a corruption case against former Prime Minister Madhav Kumar Nepal in the case of Patanjali Yogpeeth land, and the visit visa case, the party is not in the direction of thinking about an alternative to the alliance.

"The effectiveness of the government has been questioned even in the Congress central meeting, but there is no question about the legitimacy of the alliance," he said, "Congress should make a bottom line for power sharing." You can't do deceitful politics based on that alone.' 

On the first day of the central working committee meeting, leader Shekhar Koirala tried to increase the pressure on the party leadership by telling the conclusion that the rationale of the alliance has ended. But the voice of opposition to the alliance did not get strong after not getting the signal of immediate movement from the coalition. 

On the first day of the Central Working Committee meeting, which started on June 16, General Minister Gagan Thapa expressed the need for a change in working style, not an alternative to the government. Then Congress leader Koirala questioned the validity of the alliance. He concluded that the justification of the alliance has ended since the two major parties in the parliament have been equalized by advancing the agenda of amending the constitution, but they have not entered into it even after a year has passed. 

Home Minister Ramesh Akhtar countered Koirala's statement and claimed that the equation of Congress and UML will last till 084. After that, most of the members questioned the working style of the Prime Minister and Ministers in the meeting, not about the alliance. "If there was a sense of such a state of mind in Chairman Deuba, the members would have raised the issue of the alliance option in the Central Working Committee, but since Chairman Deuba himself was not ready, there was not much opinion about it," said a Congress official.

Some members of the Congress said that the power of the executive worked in the corruption case filed against the former Prime Minister Madhav Nepal, who is also the president of the United Socialist Party, by the decision of the Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court in the dispute regarding the appointment of 52 officers of the constitutional body. Some central members were of the opinion that the party leadership should be aware of Prime Minister Oli. 

In Sunday's meeting, central members Madhu Acharya and Dhruv Wagle argued that the decision of the constitutional bench had upset the balance of power and demanded that the party make a formal statement about it. The decision of the Supreme Court has seriously attacked the essence of the Constitution created by the Constituent Assembly. The supremacy of the constitution has been weakened. The balance of power between the legislature, the executive and the judiciary has been disturbed, said Acharya. Deputy Prime Minister and Urban Development Minister Prakashman Singh, who led the government from the

party, defended the government by saying that it should not go for the alternative of the coalition but to fulfill the expectations and hopes of the people from the current government. 

Leader Shekhar Koirala and some leaders of his party have been insisting that they should find an alternative to the current alliance. Leader Koirala insists that the government should be formed under the leadership of the Congress. He says, "From the beginning, I have been in the policy that the Congress and UML should form the government together, but as a large party, I believe that the government should be led by the Congress."

According to another official close to Deuba, the party leadership is not interested in the alternative because the alternative of the current alliance will be more unstable. Chairman Deuba believes that although the Maoists, United Socialists, Civil Liberties, JSP Nepal, LOSPA and Janmat Party are positive for the alternative alliance, there will be risks step by step if many small parties join together to form an alliance. There is already domestic and neighboring pressure to go to an alternative alliance. But the government is surviving because the chairman is not ready," the official said, "I don't think the chairman is ready yet. Therefore, there is little possibility that the government will be raised when the Prime Minister takes the vote of confidence.'

The 'secret' dialogue between the Congress President Deuba and the Maoist Chairman Dahal from time to time has alarmed the UML. The second level leaders of Maoist claim that before Vishwanath Paudel was appointed as the Governor of Rashtra Bank on 6th of June, there was a discussion about forming an alternative alliance between the two leaders and after that there were frequent talks. Congress President Deuba and Maoist Chairman Dahal were the chief guests at the event organized by Girija Prasad Koirala Foundation at Sheetal Niwas on Friday. The leaders say that they had a conversation in the waiting room before the start of the

program. UML Deputy Secretary General Pradeep Gyawali claims that the government is in a strong position. There is no problem between the main power partner parties. The government is moving forward with understanding," he said, "even if the government has to take a vote of confidence, there is no complication." Bishnu Rimal, chief adviser to the prime minister, said that the prime minister's office did not have the information about the civil liberties leaving the government. He said, "There is a rumor that Civil Immunity has left the government, there is no information." 

 Leader of the main opposition Maoists Varshman again says that the rationale of the two-party alliance has ended. He says that even though the Oli government will not be in crisis as long as it is with the Congress, questions are being raised about the legitimacy of the alliance. "The government has been under psychological pressure after the civil immunities withdrew their support. The government's rationale has ended because it has failed to strengthen good governance, the federal system of governance and economic prosperity,' he says, 'Parliament's math has not made a difference.' He is also represented in Lumbini and Madhesh state assemblies. After the removal of Industry, Tourism, Forest and Environment Minister Rameshwar Choudhary by the Chief Minister of Far West, Civil Liberties have decided to sit in the opposition in the Union and all provinces. 

Civil emancipation has been accusing the party unity government of breaking up with the public opinion. Between civil liberties and public opinion, the party was ready to declare unity on 17 Baisakh. But on the morning of the same day, the guardian of civil liberties Resham Chaudhary was arrested on the basis of an unauthorized letter written by Supreme Court branch officer Mahimansingh Bista to the police. "It is still a mystery as to what caused their unity to break and why they wanted to unite," says a leader of the ruling party. 

00000

'There is no problem even if you have to take a vote of confidence'

Pradeep Gyawali, Deputy General Secretary, UML

The Prime Minister will have to take a vote of confidence after leaving the government and withdrawing support, how sure are you?

When the ruling partner party withdraws support, the Prime Minister is not required to take a vote of confidence . The government is in a state of majority. Trust is strong between Congress and UML. There is no crisis for the government .

Some suspicions and complaints about the government are being made public within the Congress. At a time like this, there is a suspicion that the alliance will go down if a vote of confidence is to be taken, isn't it? No

, there is no problem between the two parties . The government has moved forward based on trust. On that basis, the alliance will proceed . There is no problem even if you have to take a vote of confidence.

Earlier, Jaspa had returned support to the government . Why are parties withdrawing support?

Civil Immunity and Jaspa do not see any particular reason to withdraw support . It would be better if it was in this alliance.

00000

'There has been no talk of going to the alternative of alliance'

Prakasharan Mahat, spokesperson, Congress

has come saying that there should be some basis to advance the power alliance . What does this mean? After the

alliance, only one party can't proceed as it wants. When one party does not have an absolute majority, not everything is as we say, nor is it as the other party says . We all have to accept this. It is said that this did not happen in our party now, that did not happen. As

is a key stakeholder, we have to create a bottom line – that it has to be heard. The minimum bottom line so fixed should be followed. The bottom line should also be made for the sustainability and continuity of the alliance. Another partner of the alliance should also understand this.

How many questions about the alliance came in the Congress Central Working Committee meeting that has been going on for a week? It didn't come up that

should go to the alternative of alliance . It is said that the partner parties should move the government forward by sharing according to their status. There is pressure that our workers and leaders should also work effectively.

Some recent developments have increased doubt among leaders?

that is of course . The visit visa case, the Patanjali case, the government's dominance, raising its hand in policies, some other things are happening, it has become a bit uncomfortable . There was no question of walking away from that.

After the removal of civil immunity from the government, the Prime Minister has to take a vote of confidence. Isn't it going to be a game in the middle ?

There is no talk about that, there will be a conversation later . But there is no need to leave the alliance tomorrow. It is more about making the government effective and making the leadership aware to work in such a way that the Congress also takes credit . What is your own opinion on the