There has been a controversy over whether the case against Madhav Kumar Nepal, chairman of the United Socialist Party of Nepal, for misappropriation of limited concession land received by Patanjali Yoga Peeth and Ayurveda Company from the government, is party-related or personal.

When he was the Prime Minister of Nepal in 2066/067, "respected" leader Jhalnath Khanal and leader Ramkumari Jhankri have expressed their displeasure saying that the decision of the land embezzlement case is now connected with the party. They have said that since the issue of corruption charges has been made a party issue, it will affect the movement of "good governance and employment, preparation for socialism" which was launched by the party . Samajwadi has already decided to protest on the issue of good governance.

The leaders of the Nepal side have argued that the prosecution of the Patanjali land case is seen as a form of retaliation by the government and that the party should respond. After the case was filed against him, the party has decided to respond.

After the case was filed against Nepal on June 22, a moral question arose before him . Soon after the case was filed, he was suspended as a member of the House of Representatives. After losing two places in the first Constituent Assembly election of 2064, he resigned on the basis of ethics, and there was an expectation inside and outside the party that he would leave the post of president until the case was settled after being accused of corruption. But even though he was suspended from the post of MP, he won the majority in the party so that he did not leave the post of chairman. 

Leader Khanal said that there were two opinions within the party saying that after the corruption case was filed, there were questions about President Nepal. "Since the issue of corruption is a serious issue, it is natural to raise ethical questions," he said, "There are two sides to the issue of whether the president should/should not resign." This is being discussed in the secretariat meeting.' 

Permanent committee member Jhankri mentioned that in the past UML leaders have faced various cases and also after that, she has started telling her relatives that the party should not be involved in such cases. She mentioned that in the past the royal regime and before that even the political case against her personally, she argued that the current case against President Nepal is personal.

'If a leader feels a case personally, why should the party get involved in it?' Sources say that he questioned the senior leaders. "The case was filed not as the party president, but because of the decision made when he was the prime minister," she said, "He is personally contesting it." When the party joins, the movement is weakened.'

On Sunday, she also demanded an 'early convention' as there was a legal and constitutional crisis over the party president in Rupandehi. 

"Now you can't walk with a dead body on the ground," he said, "let's hold an early congress". Let's choose leadership from the hall . Otherwise, if you are going to form this party by contesting the election from the central committee made by moving the voter list, then you should not form this party. In June last year, the Congress of Samajwadi elected Nepal as the president. _{Samajwadi President Madhav Kumar Nepal and Patanjali Yogpeeth and Ayurveda Company have been granted land concessions}

While the party is running a campaign for good governance, since the president himself has to confirm his innocence, it is understood that joining the party will cause damage. "I have raised my voice against the trend that everyone is corrupt except myself," Jhankri replied to the leaders. Expressing displeasure with Jhankri's latest expression, Nepal has told its close leaders that they should ask for an explanation. 

Samajwadi's spokesperson Jaganath Khatiwada said that it was clear that the party was trying to end the party by filing a case against the president.

"They are trying to finish Samajwadi by suing President Madhav Nepal," he said. There is unprecedented unity within the party.'

President and former Prime Minister of Nepal was released on 3.5 million bail by a special court in the corruption case, and the Samajwadi Party had given instructions on Sunday not to speak publicly about it.

In the meeting of the United Samajwadi Party, which started on Friday and was adjourned, most of the secretariat members were of the opinion that Nepal should not leave the post. Leaders and workers have been instructed not to speak publicly about the case filed against Nepal.

It is well-known that the initial opinion of the party has been clarified through a press release on May 22 regarding the case filed by the Authority Investigation Commission against party president Comrade Madhav Kumar Nepal in the special court. The other necessary decisions about how to deal with this situation have to be made by the party institutionally," said the statement issued by the general secretary Ghanshyam Bhusal, "Therefore, the party central office draws the attention of all comrades not to say or write anything that contradicts the official opinion of the party. In addition, he urges everyone to make sure that there are methods and places for expressing their opinions in the party and not to engage in public arguments/counter-arguments under any pretext.'  The secretariat meeting of the Samajwadi held the day after the

case was filed concluded that it was a political revenge and decided to counter. 

In August 2078, the unified socialists formed by splitting from the UML are fighting for their survival, and the corruption case has made Nepal even weaker. The Samajwadi Party, which has 10 seats in the House of Representatives, has recently fallen under the shadow of the Maoist Center. So much so that it seems to agree with the decision of the Maoist in national politics . Accepted the two-point agreement between the Maoists and the ruling party regarding the opening of the parliament on the issue of visit visas. Maoist Chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal has repeatedly expressed in favor of Nepal saying that filing a case against President Nepal is a 'political revenge'. In an interview given to Kantipur on June 8, Dahal also claimed that filing a case against Nepal was inappropriate.

'How Madhavji has been accused in Patanjali's land . It is not natural and fair . The sovereign parliament could have made policies and laws and charged them. It was not a matter that the authority would force itself. This is against the decision of the authority itself,'' he said, 'Madhavji has been attacked by breaking the traditions and precedents of the authority.'

The Samajwadi President of Nepal resigned from the post of General Secretary of the UML saying that he and his party were defeated in the elections 18 years ago.

After losing from Kathmandu 2 and Rautahat 6 in the first Constituent Assembly election of 2064, he resigned from the post of General Secretary on the basis of ethics. But shortly after that, the then Congress President Girija Prasad Koirala and Maoist President Pushpa Kamal Dahalal nominated him as a member of the Constituent Assembly. He was nominated saying that Nepal is necessary for the construction of the constitution.