Congress MPs have expressed their disbelief in the role of UML President and Prime Minister Oli regarding the delay in appointing the governor. The Congress has expressed serious doubts about the role of UML President and Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli regarding the delay in the appointment of the Governor.

After the resignation of Gunakar Bhatt, who resigned as the director of the Rashtra Bank, was not accepted in the Saturday meeting of the Congress Parliamentary Party, most MPs questioned the role of the Prime Minister saying that the appointment process was being delayed even when the name of economist Vishwa Poudel was proposed a week ago.

On the 3rd of Baisakh, Prime Minister Oli and Congress President Sher Bahadur Deuba agreed to make Rashtra Bank director Bhatt the governor. Bhatt resigned on the basis of that agreement. However, after his resignation was not accepted by Deputy Governor Neelam Dhungana, the Congress proposed last Saturday to make economist Vishwa Poudel the governor as per the agreement between the two leaders. Poudel, who is also a member of the Governor's Recommendation Committee, resigned from the committee on Sunday, the day after his name was proposed.

After his resignation, the cabinet meeting on Wednesday appointed former member of the National Planning Commission, Poshraj Pandey. After the completion of the committee chaired by Finance Minister Bishnu Paudel, the meeting of the committee for the recommendation of the governor has not yet been held. 

There is a provision in the law that the committee should recommend the names of three people including at least one deputy governor of Rashtra Bank. Only after the recommendation committee recommends the names of three people, the Council of Ministers decides to appoint one of them as the governor.

Congress asks him to resign from the parliamentary party, the resignation is not accepted, another name is proposed again  to do The Congress MPs have called the attention of the leadership not to overdo it, saying that there is a serious suspicion that there is a delay in making him. 

Congress Parliamentary Party chief whip Shyam Ghimire said that an agreement has been reached between the Prime Minister and the Congress President to appoint economist Poudel as the governor. "Even after an understanding was reached, it was not known why the appointment was being delayed," he said.

Congress MPs Hridayram Thani, Ramhari Khatiwada, Sarita Prasain, Rajendra Bajgai and others questioned the leadership as to why the appointment of the governor is being delayed. They asked that the appointment of the governor should not be over-hyped saying that the appointment of the governor was meant to weaken the country politically and economically.

MP Thani objected that the political leadership could not take action despite the shameful act of not accepting the resignation rather than resigning and going home. On the one hand, if the work to be done is not done within seven days, action will be taken, on the other hand, can the resignation of any person be held up for a month? Thani's question was, "When the leadership does not follow the law, it seems that we removed the Chief Commissioner of the Commission for Investigation of Abuse of Authority and even the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court." Why the government could not take action against the deputy governor who stopped Bhatt's resignation. There is serious suspicion.'

Another MP Sarita Prasain said that the Congress, which was the first party when it entered the government, is becoming the second largest party by the time it leaves. Prasai drew the attention of the leadership saying that Prime Minister Oli is embarking on a one-point campaign to make his party bigger. In the

meeting, the issue of MPs' budget was also prominently raised. They raised the demand that the budget distribution for the new financial year should be proportionate and equitable. They demanded that the budget should come in such a way that direct and proportional MPs should be treated equally.

He also opposed the policy decision taken by the government to give plans of more than 3 crores to the union, 1 crore to the provinces and less than that to the local level. MP Thani said that on the one hand, the government does not have a budget, on the other hand, the plan below 30 million should not be from the union, and the provisions such as DPR should be made mandatory when keeping the budget in the new plan are impractical. How is the DPR of the plan without the budget? The MP asked how the DPR can be carried out when the plan is carried out.