Why did former king Gyanendra get angry?

Analysts say - Poorvaraja is happy but the republic is not weak

Falgun 25, 2081

Kul Chandra Newpane

Why did former king Gyanendra get angry?

We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:

This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.

While the former king Gyanendra Shah is going out on the streets 'relaxingly', the republican leaders have started to present themselves in an aggressive manner regarding his campaign. The leaders of the ruling and opposition parties who are accusing each other have not only come together regarding Shah's activism, they are also resisting with one voice.

From the streets to the House, the statements given by the leaders of the government and the opposition, is the country not falling into another crisis again? Or whether the former king 'Shah' is motivated under the guise of some power, the question has arisen among the common citizens .

The leaders and analysts of the professional organizations say that even if the campaign of the monarchists makes the republican leaders aware, it is not possible to change the system in the country. They say that the road demonstration by the royalists to welcome the Shah when he came from Pokhara to Kathmandu has taught the leaders a lesson that they should go straight.

Former chief election commissioner and analyst Bhojraj Pokharel says that political parties are not serious about the issue of government instability, good governance and delivery. "If the leaders of the political parties continue to not correct mistakes, continue to repeat mistakes, ignore good governance and public service, then the leaders of political parties will have to face a very difficult situation," he said, "The main task that the government has to do now is to make good governance and just service work effective." His argument is that the monarchy, which was overthrown by the legitimacy of the parliament established by the people's movement, cannot come back with one or two incidents like this and the republic will not be weakened . In other countries where the monarchy has been thrown away, if the king wants to do politics, he will open a political party in a legal way. The constitution has also given that exemption to the former king Shah . Now Shah's kind of activity is seen on the streets, it is inspired by the desire to do politics," he said, "No matter how much you advocate for another system in opposition to the Constitution issued by the Constituent Assembly, it is not possible to achieve it. Instead, it is better to open a political party.' 

He also believes that the dissatisfaction of the citizens seen on the streets in the campaign of the royalists is due to the bad governance and bad condition of the country. "The same people are in power for a long time, the economic strength of the country is not strong, good governance is not maintained, and the young people are migrating abroad, the roads have become polluted," he said. According to him, the first reason is good governance. "Leaders of the major political parties are also internalizing the anti-establishment forces to gain power. Sometimes its dissatisfaction has erupted through Balen and sometimes it has erupted through Gopi Hamal and Hark Sampang," he said, "The current dissatisfaction is only because of Gyanendra Shah, there is no possibility of establishing a monarchy according to the constitution and laws. That power is not that strong. It is only those who have taken advantage of the disappointment.'

Many people argue that the tendency to scramble for power, the leadership of the political party since 2048 has been at the center of power, and after going to the government, it has become more desperate for the interests of the individual and the party rather than the work of the people. According to analyst Tulanarayan Sah, the task of warning the true leaders from such a trend is done by the royalists. However, he says that the political forces that fought for order and republic should not be considered as weak because of this.

Sah says that the demonstrations seen at the airport when the king came from Pokhara on Sunday gave the impression that the scattered royalist parties and Hindu union organizations are trying to organize. As the protestors carried placards with the photo of Yogi Adityanath, the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh, India, there is a suspicion that Hindu union organizations are also in league with the activism of the former king. "It seems that small forces have organized to return the king, and there is a feeling that some force is working behind it," Shah said, "Though the republic is not in a state of crisis, there are signs of bringing some kind of chaos in the country." It seems that the republican political parties should think seriously about this.'

However, leftist analyst Khagendra Prasai claims that Sunday's incident confirmed the increase in the activities of former King Shah under the guise of India. Demonstrators lined up on the streets to welcome the King and carried placards with the slogan 'Let's restore the Raj institution' with Yogi's picture on top. The name of 'Hinduwadi Pradeep Vikram Rana' was written on the bottom of the placard.

He claimed that a force in India was trying to support the street demonstration with the intention of forcing Nepal's republicanists to kneel down and make a compromise as they said.

"The Indian founding party wants to make Nepal a Hindu state". They think that their role and influence will increase if they become a Hindu state. Today's rally has also confirmed that," Prasain said, "India's interventionist role like yesterday has weakened. So in every upheaval, India wants to leave its influence . However, what India should understand is that today's Nepal cannot run under the direct supervision of Indian institutions like yesterday. Not only India has influence in Nepal, China also has influence, America has.

Nirmala Sharma, president of the Federation of Nepalese Journalists, said that despite trying to see if fishing can be done in murky waters, monarchy cannot be an alternative to republic in Nepal. "There is no possibility of a monarchy that has gone, the current youth generation is not in favor of bringing a discarded monarchy," she said, "the republic cannot be weakened by the street demonstrations instigated by some old-minded monarchists and disorderly people." The former Shah who was in the car reached Nirmal Niwas with greetings from the crowd. For a few days, the activities of the royalists are being observed in different parts of the city. The Maoists have even postponed the Madhes Jagran program centered on Hulaki Road due to this, and from Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli to Home Minister Ramesh Lakhtar, they have been responding to the questions raised by the activities of former King Shah . Prime Minister Oli, who is in the program of Sadurpaschim, said on Sunday  He has warned the former King Shah not to divide the country by dividing his mind.

"I want to say, if someone has a dream that someone will kill something and get something by following the path of anarchy, it is better not to have such a dream," Oli said while addressing the Sudurpaschim Provincial Assembly on Sunday. What will you do with Ramchandra Poudelji after he sits on a chair?' Since

, the leader of the main opposition party and Maoist chairman Dahal has said that the campaign of the party had to be stopped, pointing to the activities of the former royalists. It is the responsibility of the Maoist Center to stop the anti-people activities of the government. Now, as the people are enthusiastically participating in the campaign, we have decided to postpone the campaign for a few days and focus on the work of the Parliament and Swabiyu elections," said Dahal.

Home Minister Ramesh Akhtar said that some people are spreading confusion that the alternative to republic is monarchy and there is no need to have a king in the confusion. "There is hardly any history of kings of dynasties that were overthrown by movement and revolution enjoying their rights freely in the same country. I urge you not to forget that freedom given by the people," the author said while speaking in Surkhet on Sunday morning.

Kul

Link copied successfully