The ruling party is planning to pass the replacement bill by fast track to prevent long protests in the parliament
We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.
The government and the opposition have faced each other on the six ordinances brought by the government. Looking at the planned preparations being made by the ruling party in defense of the ordinance and the opposition parties in opposition, there are signs that there will be a heated argument between the ruling party and the opposition in the upcoming parliament meeting.
The President has called the winter session to start from January 18. In the meeting of the executive committee called by Speaker Devraj Ghimire on Tuesday to decide the agenda of the first meeting on January 18, there was a heated argument between the chief whips of the ruling party and the opposition on the issue of the ordinance. It is seen that the same will happen in the Parliament meeting.
The opposition parties are putting up a barricade for protest saying that the government has pushed back the winter session of the parliament and introduced an ordinance. On the other hand, Prime Minister Oli and Congress President Deuba are active in standing up their MPs in favor of the ordinance.
Oli and Deuba have also issued directives to their MPs to defend the ordinance. The meeting of the Congress parliamentary party held on Sunday and Monday was especially focused on the issue of defending the ordinance. Meeting Friday again The meeting has been posted .
Ordinance was also the main agenda of UML's parliamentary party meeting held on Tuesday. Keeping in mind the opposition in the parliament, the government plans to pass the replacement bill through a fast track . A minister of the government said that if the opposition makes a case against the issue of the ordinance, the parliament session may be affected, so the process of passing the ordinance is being tried soon.
If we don't pass it soon, the opposition may create a ruckus in the parliament. The functioning of the Parliament may be affected . That is why the Prime Minister is thinking that it should be passed within one and a half weeks,' said the minister, 'so the process of passing the replacement bill will proceed quickly.' Said to be in motion . The Ordinance issued by the President has been registered in the Parliament Secretariat. The government passes the ordinance through a replacement bill through a quick process," said spokesperson Gurung after Tuesday's cabinet meeting. In the UML parliamentary party meeting on Tuesday, Prime Minister Oli said that the ordinance will be passed by the parliament soon.
'Regulations are being made . We will soon bring a bill to replace it. We will present the ordinances on the first day of the session of the Parliament and we will also bring the replacement bills immediately," Oli said after the parliamentary party meeting. "Within 60 days of the commencement of the Parliament, we will have to get it approved by the Parliament as a permanent law. After approval, we will move forward by passing it in a modified manner through the amendment proposal, if there is any shortcoming when brought by the government . In general, the ordinances are correct.' However, within the Congress, the main component of the government, there is a difference of opinion regarding the ordinance.
Congress President Sher Bahadur Deuba and General Minister Gagan Thapa along with the parliamentarians of the establishment party have come out in favor of the ordinance. However, Shekhar Koirala, the leader of the other party within the party, and the MPs of his party have been opposing it. Koirala, who is in Biratnagar, has been opposing the ordinance through public events. Even in the meeting of the parliamentary party that lasted for two days, there was strong opposition from the parliamentarians of that party.
Hridayram Thani, a member of parliament from the other party, said that he was dissatisfied with the ordinance being introduced without even discussing it with the members of parliament. "Yesterday, the ordinance was strongly opposed because it was not in the government". Yes, there is a constitutional provision that ordinances can be brought when Parliament is not in session. However, our question is why it was necessary to bring the bill without informing the parliamentarians even though there is a facility to convene the parliament,' MP Thani said She said that the step of instructing not to comment publicly was wrong. "Yesterday, the leadership of the party said that it is in the interest of democracy to bring an ordinance by issuing a statement. Today we are speaking with that in mind. It is wrong to say that we cannot speak now. What is the reason for bringing an ordinance without informing any MP?' She said, 'Theoretically, it is wrong to bring an ordinance in this way.' Congress should be able to show the same form in words and actions.'
Rajendra Bajgai, another MP from the Shekhar party, said that the party will not stop criticizing the ordinance. "The leadership should keep in mind that MPs are not subordinates of the party but representatives elected by the sovereign people," he said, "the party cannot be democratic if it tries to prevent internal disagreements." The MPs said they would not go against the party's decision. He said that public opposition within the ruling party regarding the ordinance brought by the government to show some good work would not be good.
'How much Parliament had to advance the process of making laws . If not, the process of bringing ordinances will not decrease, it will increase," Ghimire said, "It is not good to bring ordinances. As the Parliament is unable to enact a law, the government has no other option.
The Prime Minister also called a meeting of the ruling parties on Monday evening to come to a consensus on the ordinance within the ruling party. In Baluwatar, Oli urged the participating leaders to defend the ordinance brought by the government by putting Deuba on the same seat as him.
UML, Congress, Janata Samajwadi Party, Democratic Samajwadi Party and Civil Liberation Party are participating in the federal government. Janata Samajwadi Party (JSP) and Janmaat have only given support. Most of the protests brought by the government have been about the land ordinance. Most of the people understand that the ordinance brought by the government to make it easier to give Dhanipurza to squatters and temporary residents can be misused . A leader of the Congress said that Prime Minister Oli had called a Baluwatar meeting to formulate a common strategy because he thought that there would be a lot of criticism in the Parliament.
The government has amended some Nepal Acts, Economic Procedures and Financial Responsibility (First Amendment) Ordinance, Privatization (First Amendment) Ordinance, Ordinance to amend some Nepal Acts related to economic and business environment improvement and investment promotion, Ordinance to amend some Nepal Acts related to land and An ordinance was brought to amend some Nepal Acts related to cooperatives.
Maoist chief whip Hitraj Pandey said that the opposition parties will strongly oppose the ordinance brought by the government. When the chief whip of the ruling party defended the ordinance in the meeting of the executive committee called by Speaker Ghimire, he countered it .
"A large party of the Parliament has spoken the language of governance through ordinances". This is a serious democratic idea," he said. Ekikat Samajwadi chief whip Metmani Chaudhary questioned the ruling party saying that the government has collapsed and the ordinance has been brought. Mahesh Bertaula, the chief whip of UML said that since the 'doubts' of Maoist Chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal having to step down from power have not yet been removed, they are trying to make the ordinance a political weapon. It is the conclusion of the Satapaksha that the answer should be given by the Parliament as the
is an act of misrepresentation, creating confusion, misleading and opposing the ordinance brought as per the constitution,' he said, 'the entire ruling party is standing together in this . There is no disagreement within the ruling party.'
