He said that he would make an ambassador during the term of the chief secretary and brought another one. It takes the constitutional organs, and the bureaucracy gets worse. The Constitutional Commission has become like a resting place for retired employees. Can't you find others?'- Former Chief Secretary Bimal Koirala
We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.
Experts have suggested that a certain time period should be set for appointment to the Constitutional Commission or other government agencies after retiring from the high posts of the civil service. On the 'Bill to regulate the formation, operation and conditions of service of the Federal Civil Service' pending in the State Order and Good Governance Committee under the House of Representatives, administration experts have suggested that a 'cooling period' should be kept for those retired from the service to go to the Constitutional Commission and government appointments.
In Tuesday's meeting of the State Administration Committee, former Chief Secretary Bimal Koirala expressed the view that a 'cooling period should be specified' in the bill for the next constitutional appointment after retiring from the staff. He said he would make an ambassador during the term of the chief secretary and brought another one. It takes the constitutional organs, and the bureaucracy gets worse. The Constitutional Commission has become like a resting place for retired employees. Can't find others? Are not new people from the university found for appointment in the Constitutional Commission?,' he said.
Umesh Mainali, the former chairman of the Public Service Commission, also said that a cooling period should be set. He suggested, 'It is better to keep the cooling period for 3 years. The matter of cooling period is good. Former Chief Secretary Koirala advised the MPs not to be influenced by interest groups and pressure groups while making the civil law. He said, "When we make a civil law, we are influenced by selfishness, power and pressure groups, and we say that gossip will make the country." He said that even though there is a three-level government, there is a hint of unitary mentality in the bill. This law is needed after the country goes to federalism, there is a three-level government but there is a rife with a unitary mentality. Our mentality was that it will happen when the central government says it, why not think in a new way?, he said. He asked when the new bill will come.
Constituent Assembly member and former administrator Janakraj Joshi suggested that civil service should be written as public accountability. He said that civil servants should be accountable to the people through Parliament. He said that there should be a qualification system for employees. He suggested that health services should not be kept out of the civil service. Stating that the bureaucracy could not rise above the job and job, he said that the bill came as the civil service is only for the executive. He said that it is not right that there is no parliamentary control and balance over the bureaucracy.
Joshi's suggestion is that the provision that the chief secretary should have 4 years of service remaining should be kept in the law. He said that those who have got foreign green card and PR should be removed from the bureaucracy. Similarly, Joshi also suggested that the property of civil servants should be made public.
Former President Mainali suggested that the civil service bill should be focused only on the safety and convenience of the employees rather than how to provide services effectively. Regarding the provisions proposed in the bill, he said, "The civil service bill is only focused on the safety and convenience of the employees, but not on the services of the people." There is no coordination role between the employees and the leadership in this system. We can keep only one chapter on responsibility. There are many responsibilities that employees have to shoulder. How to make citizens participate in the structure of administration? How to make it effective in the place of serving citizens directly? It was not kept, it was a mistake," he said.
According to Mainali, the provision to send the secretary of the state government from the center was proposed in the bill and the bill was against the federal system. As he is also the chairman of the Public Service Commission, he is against federalism and is regressive. Where does the constitution say that the secretary of the province will be appointed by the center? It is said that they will be assigned permanently by the provinces, this arrangement proposed in the bill is not compatible,'' he said. It is not even called transfer. It will only be sent for work.' He said that the
was only in the gossip to make the civil service accountable to the people, but it was not mentioned anywhere in the bill. He said that the retirement age of employees should be kept at 60 years and the maximum age of service entry should be kept at 35 years for men and 40 years for women. The government has proposed 32 years for men and 37 years for women.
Experts also suggest that provision should be made in the Act itself to organize the transfer of employees. They say that since the government will transfer the employees before the deadline, the provision of predictable transfer and promotion should be kept in the law. Experts have suggested to discuss about giving the right to transfer to the Public Service Commission.
