We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.
In the National Assembly, the leader of the Nepali Congress parliamentary party, Krishna Prasad Sitaula, has said that he will not allow the meeting of the two houses to be conducted until a parliamentary inquiry committee is formed in the cooperative fraud case against the Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister Ravi Lamichhane.
Speaking at the meeting of the National Assembly held on Friday, Leader Sitaula claimed that the fraud charges against the Home Minister are not excusable and that the police cannot investigate the affairs of the Home Minister impartially.
The Congress Parliamentary Party meeting held on Friday morning also decided not to allow the meeting of both Houses until a Parliamentary Inquiry Committee is formed.
He also objected that the Attorney General has given a clean chit to a government minister which is not in history. We have also spoken to the Home Minister himself. We have asked you to form a parliamentary investigation committee and get a clean chit. We want to help. There is talk of billions of scams. There is talk of embezzlement of billions. How can it be possible to give a clean chit without investigating such a big charge against the Home Minister?'
He claimed that the Congress did not ask for the resignation of the Home Minister in connection with the case. "Now we have not even asked for resignation." Let's form a parliamentary inquiry committee, you are the ruling party, we said. First of all, I see the Minister of Home Affairs as saying that an investigation committee should not be formed. Why not make it? If he is innocent, the investigation committee will not make him so guilty,' he said.
