Essays seem to require a balance of topics and ideas. The writer should have a clear view of the current topic rather than the brainstorming or intellectual luxury of an abstract topic within the essay.
We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.
The grief, sorrow and pain of the earthlings are the content of the virgin lama. Essayist, critic, university teacher Lama's new essay-book 'Darju Sanlap' has been published.
His previous book 'Ujyalo Andhakar' was appreciated among the readers. Nepali Essay-path about Kumari Lama with Deepak Sapkota dialogue :
In 'Darju Sanlap', you have discussed the issues of women and marginalized communities and being a 'Tamang', you have criticized 'your' culture. Like you, our essays have written a story of resistance to marginalization? What do we need in an essay?
The first thing is that any writer is free to choose a topic, to adopt a bias or to adopt a presentation style. So in essay or any other genre, writers approach the subject in their own way. The story of the resistance of the marginals, of course, has been written. Many voices of resistance have appeared in Nepali essays.
Krishna Dharavasi's essays are still in my mind. In some of his essays, the final decisions taken by the earthlings are quite remarkable. Similarly, the same is found in the essays of Resham Virhi. His 'Sweeper Malati' is the story of a marginal character with a resistant consciousness. The story of resistance time depicted in the essays of Narayan Dhakal or the height of self-centered resistance consciousness captured by Momila's essays are amazing. A
essay seems to require a balance of topics and ideas. The writer should have a clear view of the current topic rather than the brainstorming or intellectual luxury of an abstract topic within the essay. Around us there are many topics and characters to be written about, which today's essayists are trying to capture.
Especially today, we are facing a mountain of opportunities and challenges. Every life is riddled with unexpected complications. Meanwhile, everyone has their own kind of efforts to deal with or counter that complexity. So everywhere there are resistant characters and their unique stories. In my opinion, the essay should cover such struggling life stories. Critics say there has been a diversity in
writing, but the great procession of young people is in transition. There is opportunity, tension and competition. What are the writings, thoughts and dreams of young people who are torn between these three points?
Young people of every era fall into completely different situations. However, they are also the ones who can overcome those feelings and lead the society on the right path. Today's youth are at the mercy of the capitalist market system and the rapidly advancing technological development. They walk with great ambitions and big dreams.
It's good to have a dream, but don't set your ambitions so high that your life ends before you reach your destination. Unfolding is a harrowing story of young people with big dreams trying to break the illegal path to an assured future. Such painful stories are like a treasure in literature, but the life of the sufferer is a realm of imagination for others. These days, I am thinking - where will the material-centered mentality and consumerist time lead the society!
Essayists are writing essays, readers are reading. In this case, why should we discuss the topic of the essay?
Without debate and discussion, the society is not oriented towards the status quo? The author does not want the meaning to freeze at a certain point. A current of a certain idea. Or silence in favor of regression. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss every area for wordiness, flow, arrival and reception of new ideas. Literature or essays must also be included in it.
Parijat named 'Asmita' magazine, worked as the editor of the new issue, writes essays, teaches. Is it easier to be a magazine editor or to teach or to write essays?
Naturally there are easy and difficult aspects associated with every job. Also every responsibility is challenging. Editing, writing and teaching are three distinct but equally challenging fields. I enjoy taking on challenges in my chosen field. The work I do is all about collaboration with letters and knowledge production. I have accepted these responsibilities as opportunities rather than hardships as they are associated with the power of letters and ideas.
Today's writers-readers are involved in debates on essays. However, one question has not been considered - are our current essays thought or thought?
Sharpening our thoughts requires both reflection and reflection. Both of these are necessary if we consider the essay to be a powerful medium of expression. Where the problem may have started is that we put thinking at the level of serious thought or high-level intellectual work, but thinking only as petty or unnecessary gossip.
In some cases, it is forbidden as 'Thangne Gaf'. However, what should be understood is that every human being has grievances and grievances within them. It needs to be kneaded for its easy release. Especially the writers who write the story of people should be able to include both the writing and the brainstorming! What, how much and how to bring to writing will depend on the ability and creativity of the writer!
'Contemplation' demands 'depth' and is life-enlightening, 'Ganthan' 'surface subject'. Differentiate the meaning of these two words and say - what kind of essay should be written now?
Essays that have a fair amount of both are good. How appropriate would it be to create an environment where the reader is overwhelmed by the weight of ideas? Again, it is not justified to be surprised by just pouring out pain and suffering without any change of thought. In particular, the work of taking the respect of any word by breaking it into pieces is done by intellectuals. As wordsmiths, we writers do not need to stick to just one meaning of any word. Our eyes should also go to other meanings of the word 'Ganthan'. The
essay genre is popular, but how is it theoretically, seriously, and empirically?
This is a very serious question. Its academic analysis demands a lot of time. Because there are theories of essays and there are many theories to analyze essays. From a practical and literary point of view, creation is the first condition. Then comes its theoretical or conceptual analysis etc. There are many claims and arguments on the experimental side of
. Not only essays, but all genres of literature are being questioned about their suitability and practical purpose. However, what is missed by the questioners is the long-term impact or contribution of knowledge production through creation and the social change it leads to. A lot of discussion is needed on this matter. Lakshmi Prasad Devkota, the father of
essays, said – Essays are table gossip, not lectures by a bespectacled teacher. Someone has said that an essay is a kind of conversation. Is the essay 'table gossip' as Devkota-Baje puts it? What do you think about the essay?
In my opinion essay is not only table gossip, it is also coffee gossip, wine gossip even more. Because it's part of the essay's specialty to give a trip of thought, like the intoxication of wine. As Shankar Lamichhane said, an eye contact with an 'obscure face' that accompanies you on your writing journey can be the swagger of a wanderer! Or even the flow of memory that flows freely from the corner of memory. Therefore, the essay has neither a single rhythm nor a single language. His color, form, movements, and actions are many. Multi-color or seven-color essay is the special beauty.
Now prose-compositions, poetry, memoirs, book-reviews have all become essays. What topics should be included in the essay category?
writings are finished within the essay. Therefore, all the types of writings that have been covered or inserted into the essay till date, now it is time to have a serious debate about how many parts of the essay are there (or not). For this, there is an academic or theoretical debate on the one hand, while an analysis of creative characteristics and quality can also be done.
Today's writers are serious about literature and say 'it should be saved' or do they say 'literature should be sold'?
Literature is not saved by the reader rather than the author? After the author has written, the reader is in charge. Every writer must be very sensitive to the subject he writes about. It is not reasonable for the writer himself to wish for the immortality of his writing or to seek immediate results. Seriousness and patience are revealed in the writer more than enthusiasm about his writing. What remains is the context of selling literature - some things have gone beyond our control.
We have reached such a circle in the market that, even if we don't want it, the market, price, consumer (reader), buying and selling have all been connected with literature. It has become a commodity in itself to be consumed. However, it is better to sell books than to sell cigarettes that are harmful to health.
It doesn't put the consumer's life at risk (at least there was a time of death when keeping the red book), but it is possible to get some knowledge, inspiration or tips. Again, there is a questionable topic, how much are the artists benefiting from the sale of the book?
