We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.
The speakers said that Nepali cinema is rejecting the knowledge, skills, abilities and contribution of the oppressed community towards the society. Film Journalist Association Kaski said that in the cinema dialogue held in Ghalegaon, Kholasothar Rural Municipality-3 of Lamjung on Saturday, the speakers said that the oppressed community is only portrayed as a weak character in the cinema.
In the discussion titled 'Voice of tribals and marginalized in cinema', director Naveen Subba, leader and analyst Vishwabhakt Dulal (Ahuti), artist and producer Asha Magrati and writer Vikas Subedi were interviewed by Kantipur journalist Deepak Pariyar. The
speakers said that the stories of tribal and marginalized communities have not been relatively reported in cinema. They said that the main root of this is not only caste but also the influence of class system.
director Naveen Subba commented that filmmakers also compromise with the structure of cinema. He said, "There is a lot of censorship in Nepali cinema now". There are 2 things in cinema, watching from the inside and watching from the outside . We are not saying what we have to say, we make a deal.'
'If Dolpali is dissatisfied, will Meen Bham not be able to make the film now?', he asked. He suggested to be aware of the facts of the subject. He said, "Film workers will advance the society". There are these problems, we have to look at it this way and move on.'
He said that there will be no Nepali cinema by imitating South Indian cinema. He said that since cinema is beyond that, sociology and aesthetics should be taken care of. He recalled that 600 fan clubs were formed after "Dalan".
'If we kill the beauty and start building a big hotel in this Ghalegaon, it will not exist,' he said, 'It is not that there is no genre in Nepali filmmaking, but we have not been able to address it.' Mentioning the fact that the films produced by the tribal tribes are earning better than the so-called Nepali mainstream films, he said that not everyone's interest in that direction has reached .
Author and analyst Ahuti said that although the issue of tribal tribes has started appearing in Nepali cinema, it is still lagging behind in covering the issue of women and Dalits. "The knowledge of the oppressed is still not accepted". Caste system also says uneducated . Education from Britain also says uneducated,' he said, 'portraying them as uneducated and ignorant is a feature of Nepali cinema.'
He said that the main issue is how the bad subject was told in the aesthetics of the cinema . He said, "When making a movie about the oppressed, it is shown that the oppressed are ignorant and uneducated." The director is not ready to accept their education . Even if the woman is the driver of the whole family, the main contribution is covered.
He gave the example of this year's super hit movie 'Poorna Bahadur Ko Sarangi'. It has been shown that the Gandharvas are illiterate. However, if they are uneducated, how do they make sarangi, how do they play it? How do you go to Surtal? It has been a job to cover up their historical contribution to move the society forward,' he says.
Puts such a dream in the mind of Purna Bahadur, Jha of Terai, Yadav, the owner of Satvigha, Neupane family of Syangja has been shown a dream. Looks like a clown . The Dalit character is shown as a harmless clown . The basic trend is like that.'
He said that there is a tendency in society to be revolutionary, status quo and backward or even domineering. He suggested that topics that are going on in the society should not be presented lightly. He said that writers also have caste and selfishness and suggested that they should be ready to transform to make themselves progressive.
artist Asha Magrati recalled that when she represented the Dalit community that too through a woman, in the early days she was afraid that someone would leave her because of her caste. However, she responded that she was very happy to come to this place and give her voice.
She said, "I got to see an artist with cast (caste) like mine". The writer also got to see . It is now more than before.' She said that although there has been an improvement compared to before, there has not been much progress.
writer Vikas Subedi recalled that he traveled around 60/62 districts carrying a bag for 2 years after active journalism. In which he said that he was a little closer to Madhes. While writing 'Prakash', he said that he saw a teacher from Madhesh in West Dolpa, Humla of Nepal, and he did not think that someone would write in a biased manner while creating a character. In
'Cinema and Music: How original, how modern ?', artist Rima Vishwakarma interacted with composers Shambhujit Baskota, Basant Sapkota and Prakash Saput. Journalist Subrata Acharya interacted with artist Kashma Manandhar and expert Anil Neupane in the session 'From Reel to AI: Technology and Technology'.
was the last session, 'Cinema and Government: Problem in Policy or Intention?' In that session, journalist Amrit Subedi interacted with Chairman of Film Development Board Dinesh DC and President of Film Journalists Association Samir Balami.
