Second Financial Sector Development Strategy: Excessive liquidity management and credit-deposit imbalance are challenging

With the increasing use of technology, cybersecurity risk management has emerged as another major challenge.

Magh 15, 2082

Kantipur Reporter

Second Financial Sector Development Strategy: Excessive liquidity management and credit-deposit imbalance are challenging

We use Google Cloud Translation Services. Google requires we provide the following disclaimer relating to use of this service:

This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, expressed or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement.

The second financial sector development strategy has pointed out that the management of excess liquidity accumulated in banks and financial institutions over the last three years and the imbalance between credit and deposits has been challenging.

The Financial Sector Development Strategy (Fiscal Year 2082/83-2086/87), released by the Ministry of Finance on Wednesday, states that the appropriate management of liquidity created due to increasing competition in banks and financial institutions and structural changes in the economy is becoming challenging.

‘The situation of imbalance between deposit mobilization and credit flow has been repeated time and again. Credit in the banking sector is centralized in terms of sectors and groups,’ the strategy states, ‘Access to credit has not been expanded sufficiently. After the global pandemic of Covid, the non-performing loan ratio has increased due to the failure to recover loans as expected, and non-banking assets have also increased.’

Despite the expansion of commercial bank branches in all 753 municipalities, the strategy states that financial institutions have not had a sufficient physical presence in all rural areas due to the lack of adequate infrastructure, difficult geographical conditions, and scattered settlements.

It is also a challenge to promote investment by creating a competitive environment by eliminating existing structural problems in the economy, creating domestic employment in line with the national environment, developing entrepreneurship, and substituting imports. However, it is stated that the task of flowing credit to the productive sector and ensuring credit utilization is challenging.

With the increasing use of technology, cybersecurity risk management is seen as another major challenge. The strategy states that the task of providing accessible financial services is not easy when the informal economy has not been adequately displaced.

‘Risk-based regulation and supervision of systemically important banks (SIPs) that have merged with the banking sector and have large capital structures through acquisitions has not been increased,’ the strategy states, ‘The task of accurately identifying asset quality and accurately analyzing the trend of interconnected credit transactions is challenging.’ The strategy also states that the task of implementing an integrated supervision system in interconnected institutions is challenging as problems arising in one sector of the financial sector can spread to other sectors.

The strategy has set a strategy to prepare clear criteria for strengthening and stability of the financial sector, enhance regulatory capacity and institutional strengthening, and review the structural condition (classification, regulatory management, and scope) of banks and financial institutions. The strategy also includes a strategy to develop a system for exchanging information/data among financial sector regulators, and to bring the comprehensive supervision of subsidiaries of banks and financial institutions within the legal framework. 

It is stated that laws will be formulated for the establishment of asset management companies, issuance of regulations to identify systemically important banks, and control criminal activities targeting the banking sector by minimizing cyber risks. The strategy also includes a strategy to prepare a financial stability index to measure financial stability and develop a resilient financial sector.

The institutional banking system in Nepal began in 1994. Until 2040, only four government-promoted banks and financial institutions existed. The private sector entered this sector from 2041. In line with the liberalization policy adopted after the change in 2047, Nepal Rastra Bank also became very flexible in establishing financial institutions in order to increase financial access and raise resources for development.

Due to which, microfinance programs were started in Nepal through Rural Development Microfinance, Small Farmers Cooperatives, and Savings and Credit Cooperatives.

In the past decade, the central bank has been emphasizing on strengthening, consolidation, and integration of banks and financial institutions. Along with the policy of financial liberalization adopted by the country, the number, type, and services of financial institutions have been diversified, and the financial system has been gradually modernized. In the context of a significant increase in the size and depth of the financial sector, a financial sector development strategy is being formulated to support the overall economic development of the country and to make the financial sector strong, robust, competitive, and risk-bearing.

The Government of Nepal had implemented the Financial Sector Development Strategy (2073/74–2077/78) for the first time. The period of that strategy has expired. In which the increase in the use of the latest financial tools and artificial intelligence in the financial sector, and the rapid development in the information technology sector have been taken as the results of the implementation of the first Financial Sector Development Strategy. On that basis, the government has formulated the second Financial Sector Development Strategy (2082/83–2086/87).

Kantipur

Link copied successfully