Aphorisms and anecdotes are not missing from Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli's speech. But he is not limited to this from time to time, while speaking, sometimes he seems to show arrogance, sometimes he seems to be excited and sometimes he does not hold back even to the extent of expressing hatred towards his opponents.

But sometimes he is more than this . As it happened on Saturday .

Prime Minister Oli instructed to put Kathmandu under the control of UML on May 15 at the training program of ward presidents organized by UML Bagmati Province Committee in Godavari. He was not limited to this, he said to the UML leaders and activists in the hall, "The party says what should be done on the 15th". Be ready for whatever you have to do.' 

Prime Minister Oli, sitting on the throne of two-thirds of the all-powerful power, did not stop there. He specified the date and time and said, "Kathmandu should be under the control of CPN-UML from 11 pm to 2 pm on the 15th". Leave the matter of which organization takes the lead, who organizes what.' 

There is no need to debate that the Prime Minister may have forgotten that he is sitting in the all-powerful position of the country and said this only to fill the energy of his workers . Rather, it is necessary to discuss whether it is acceptable for him to invite such incitement and confrontation while strengthening the status and dignity of the position of the Prime Minister. 

Nepal is neither in an internal war nor in an external war. Here there are different opinions, there are different opinions. Those who are in power are in the business of exposing each other through social media, while those who are outside of power are in a frenzy, walking with a torch of anger, what has become a new thing?

Some groups on the streets may be walking with seeds of hatred. They may also be wondering whether the cultivation of extremism can flourish. They are also looking for when the power leaves the religion and the fire can be extinguished. But these things are new things for the living society! 

If those in power are not able to protect their honor and reputation, and they dig against it because of the increased excitement and anger in the streets, what is the character of democracy? Is it a decent thing to stay in power, exercise all power and if someone says something or comments against you, you have to speak about it in every forum or event?

At this time, anyone can tell how long the list of things that the Prime Minister should and should not speak is. A long list of tips can be collected even if you only take a quick look at social media.

The home minister of his own government has been mired in accusations . The light is flickering, there is fear among the citizens that the inverter era will return again. But a member of the cabinet is saying, 'The illusion that there are no lights has been created artificially by spreading rumours.'

He warns that the numbers of those who spread rumors will be taken to the police and action will be taken against them. It doesn't seem like the government has the time to discuss why the triket stadium could not be built in three months.

There is no concern about how to guarantee that the situation like the one that had to be laughed at until the day of the appointment of the governor will not happen again. Months have passed since the country's largest and oldest university was under the care of the vice-chancellor, but the government has nothing to do with it. 

But Prime Minister Oli is only commenting on those who are trying to come to the streets by saying that they should bring the king from every stage . And they are ordering that the entire city should be under the possession of so-and-so from this hour to this hour, contradicting the philosophy that it should be ruled by the crowd. Let's say, this city is ready to be occupied by someone . Citizens here are someone's raiti . Supposedly, to save this city from some terrible calamity, it is impossible to capture it . 

Prime Minister Oli, who announced the capture of the city on Sunday, did not stop there. He criticized the royalists at the tourism dialogue held at Singha Durbar on Monday as well. While the context and context of this program was different. But what does the Prime Minister mean about this!

He said in the same evergreen style, "Another astrologer after talking about what is needed and what is not needed". Now this is done by flipping it, it is said . Another one comes out, another one flips the calendar, if not the grandfather, then the grandson will definitely say it again . If that's the case, the other says on the street, "Bhai Bhai". This kind of spectacle also happened on the same day.'

is a purely political question of where the king comes and why he comes. The leaders of the party that removed the king and brought the republic certainly have the right to comment on that. As much as the royalists have the right to peacefully come to the streets and voice their opinions. If no one is allowed to walk on the street, no one is allowed to hold a different opinion, why do we need democracy? What is the addiction of the Prime Minister who has to make comments on the same topic every day? It seems rather necessary to discuss it.