[Archive] What was the palace's conspiracy in that event of the Jalpan ceremony?

वैशाख ११, २०८२

कान्तिपुर संवाददाता

[Archive] What was the palace's conspiracy in that event of the Jalpan ceremony?

If you turn the pages of history, you will find that the parties used to argue and debate on what issues and how the political events took interesting turns. A similar incident happened on October 1, 2050. On the occasion of the conclusion of the fifth session of the Parliament, a refreshment ceremony was organized in the honor of King Birendra at the Parliament complex Sinha Darbar.

This refreshment ceremony became an incident, the main reason for the resignation of Speaker Damannath Dhungana . 

The issue of not even providing chairs for Congress Supreme Leader Ganeshman Singh, Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala and other leaders in refreshment took a political color. On the day after the refreshments, the parliamentarians expressed their anger on this issue in the meeting of the Congress parliamentary party on October 2nd. In the meeting, Girija Prasad and other MPs also criticized the Speaker. And the then speaker Damannath Dhungana resigned over this matter . Dhungana welcomed the parliamentary party's motion of regret against him. And he responded that he resigned so that it would be easier to investigate, saying that he was not above the parliamentary party .

The chair case of refreshment ceremony is not over yet . The then Congress General Minister Nidhi indicated that the weakness in the management of the chair could be the hand of courtiers. He said, "The incident has violated the parliamentary tradition, democratic and constitutional dignity." The then Chief Whip of the Congress Parliamentary Party, Tarinidutt Chatout, said that the reactionaries were caught by the agreement of the Congress Amal saying that the incident could be planned.

[Archive] What was the palace's conspiracy in that event of the Jalpan ceremony?

Congress used to call democracy 'baby' at that time . Congress leaders including Prime Minister Koirala and Ganeshman during their speeches used to denigrate some incidents as a game to weaken 'baby democracy'. Therefore, it was suspected that the incident that happened during refreshments could be a conspiracy of those who are against the system and those close to the palace.

General Minister Nidhi gave the information to the media that Speaker Dhungana had withdrawn his resignation amid many suspicions and suspicions. MP Kuveer Sharma, who was known to be an opponent of the government at that time, had a different opinion saying that since the army and the entire administrative system are under the authority of Prime Minister Koirala, only the speaker should not be blamed for this . Kuwer, who introduced himself as an anti-Koirala and is close to Congress Party Chairman Krishna Prasad Bhattarai, has also been interpreted in this way by some people.

This event was published in Kantipur on October 4, 2050 under the title of resignation presented by the Speaker.

presentation: Rishiram Paudyal

कान्तिपुर संवाददाता

Link copied successfully